Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Juan Garcia in the News

If you are in Corpus this Memorial Day Weekend...
then you should swing by Juan Garcia's 40th Birthday Party.

Spend the Sunday evening of Memorial Day Weekend or May 28th in the shadow of the USS Lexington at the Blue Ghost Landing Beach Bar, and join Juan for his 40th Birthday Celebration.

Free admission. Join us between 6-10 PM for an evening of dancing, drinks, and a special live performance by Juan's rock band, with surprise special guests!

(And the much requested "Army of Juan" t-shirts will be available).

For more information please log on to Juan's web site:
www.electjuangarcia.com

Remember, Monday is Memorial Day so you don't have to go to work (hopefully)...

Posted by Eddie on 05/25/2006 at 11:24 AM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Sparkling City by the Sea Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (0)
Gene Seaman already running scared


10-year incumbent Rep. Gene Seaman may publicly say he's not worried about the challenge from first time candidate Lt. Cmd Juan Garcia, but that's not what he's telling his inner circle.

In a March 27, 2006 letter to previous donors, Seaman wrote that he is "engaged in a major fight", and exhorted them to "consider doubling or tripling your annual donation." Click here (letter.pdf) to see actual letter.







Seaman has also been paying about $6,500 a month for three large commercial billboards bearing his likeness around the district, 10 months before the election. That is around $32,500 on freaking billboards.


Good thing he's not worried....
Continue reading "Gene Seaman already running scared" »

Posted by Eddie on 05/11/2006 at 10:38 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (1)
Juan Garcia ~ In the News
Juan Garcia has a been a busy man lately. Garcia, candidate for HD 32, was all over the newspapers this Sunday.

On Thursday, Juan Garcia introduced his Harvard classmate Sen. Barrack Obama (D-IL) at fundraiser in Austin. Present at the event was another Harvard Law classmate, Juan's wife Denise Garcia.








I attended this event and beside the impressive speeches by both Juan Garcia and Sen. Obama, I was shocked by how many young people was there. The packed room was filled by high school and college-aged supporters. I go to my share of these events and I am happy to see that there is a new generation of active participation in politics.

There was also great article written in the SA Express News in Carlos Guerra's column.


A second-generation naval aviator, he had risen to lieutenant commander when he left active duty in a career that included 30 armed missions over the Persian Gulf, one of which ended with an emergency landing during a sandstorm. In the process, he also was appointed White House fellow.

[....]

"A lot of the analysts said, 'That district is not going to elect someone whose name ends in a vowel,' and in the past, it is undeniable: They voted in droves against the Hispanic candidate," García says. "But I choose to believe that this campaign is emblematic in closing that chapter in our history.

"I think that the right person with the right qualifications and the right message and vision can close that chapter so we can get to the issues we all care about," he adds.

And such political divisiveness isn't limited to race issues.

"There are issues out there, education, property taxes, services, that also transcend party," he says. That's why he picked fellow pilot [Joe] Hall — a Republican — for his campaign treasurer. "I wanted to send a message."



This is guy is the real deal. It is nice to see a campaign trying to woo the entire district on real issues. I expect Seaman will probably try to create some false wedge issue to divide the district. I am glad Garcia is focused on what really matters in the district.

Garcia also spoke at annual earth day festival at Cole Park on Saturday. He talked about how Texas leads the nation in polluters but fails to adequately monitor the polluters. Apparently, polluters in Texas self report their emissions. Hmmm... kinda like putting Michael Jackson in charge of the day care. This kind of self-serving industry practice will not change until we see a real change in our elected officials.

Garcia has also been busy securing the restoration of the Dr. Hector P. Garcia (no relation) office builiding. He was the first Mexican American to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom. This is the highest award a civilian can receive. Dr. Garcia organized the American G.I. Forum (1948) initially to improve veteran benefits and enhance medical attention. But it soon expanded to address educational and vocational training, housing, public education, poll taxation, voter registration, hospitalization and employment. Today the American G. I. Forum has nearly 160,000 members in 502 chapters in 24 states.


Posted by Eddie on 04/23/2006 at 11:02 AM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (1) TrackBack (1)
Richard Morrison: Help Juan Garcia defeat Seaman and his dirty DeLay money
I just recieved an email from Richard Morrison supporting Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia and his bid to unseat Gene Seaman in HD 32. It reads:

Former Congressman Tom DeLay. Has a nice ring to it, doesn't it?

When I ran against him two years ago, I talked about the sheer reach of his corrupt Texans for a Republican Majority political action committee (TRMPAC).

This year, my friend Juan Garcia is running against one of biggest beneficiaries of that corruption -- State Rep. Gene Seaman, the Republican real estate developer from Corpus Christi.

That's why I'm writing you today -- to ask you to join me in supporting Juan so that we can continue to clean up the House and rid Texas politics of DeLay's allies.

Juan is the new face of leadership in Texas -- dynamic, independent, rooted in his community. A veteran of Operation Allied Force in Kosovo, an instructional pilot in the Navy Reserve, and a former assistant to the U.S. Secretary of Education, he brings to this race a refreshing energy and integrity.

Seaman, on the other, seems to be the man for whom the term "furniture" to describe inept lawmakers was coined. He pocketed $35,000 from DeLay's TRMPAC and its parent organization ARMPAC in his 2002 race. He took an additional $80,000 from other DeLay-linked sources, including Houston megadonor Bob Perry, the indicted Texas Association of Business, and Texans for Lawsuit Reform.

And then he voted in lock step for every extremist idea to come down the pike. Redistricting? Why not! Cut half-a-million kids off CHIP? You bet! Double college tuition rates? Of course! The single biggest tax hike in Texas history? Who cares!

Let's take a stand for Juan Garcia against DeLay's rubber stamp. Click here to send him a generous donation so he can keep fighting to provide Corpus Christi with the kind of independent voice it deserves.

Fight On!
Richard Morrison

Pretty cool, huh? We win the Texas House back one seat at a time. This is the race we can and need to win. Go help and contribute to Juan's campaign.

Posted by Eddie on 04/11/2006 at 04:14 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Tomstown Scandal, Tom Delay Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (2)
Seaman asked to get rid of dirty Delay money
Lt. Cmdr. Juan Garcia, candidate for HD 32, asked for Republican Gene Seaman to return all the dirty Delay money he has received (see full press release here). Garcia suggests that this money should be to donate a local children's health clinic. Seaman's vote on CHIP removed hundreds of thousand of working family's children off the heatlh insurance program in 2003.

State representative candidate Juan Garcia today called on his opponent to give nearly $50,000 he took from Tom DeLay and others linked to the ongoing corruption scandals surrounding the disgraced congressman to a local children's health clinic.

"This campaign should be about our community's future, not my opponent's past," Garcia said. "I encourage him to put this behind him so that we can spend the rest of this campaign talking about how to fix our public schools, keep our kids healthy, and make our neighborhoods stronger."

Incumbent Gene Seaman reported accepting $48,710 in 2002 from two discredited political action committees founded by DeLay, Texans for a Republican Majority (TRMPAC) and its parent organization, Americans for a Republican Majority (ARMPAC), as well as from the Texas Association of Business (TAB). TRMPAC and TAB have since been indicted as part of a continuing criminal grand jury investigation in Travis County.
DeLay announced this week that he will resign his office as the biggest political corruption scandal in a generation continues to embroil the leadership in Washington, D.C. and Austin.

Delay resignation effects all of Texas because his corrupting influence permeated all of Texas. Will Seaman donate the dirty money? Probably not. He probably thinks he did nothing wrong money by taking tainted money. We shall see.



Posted by Eddie on 04/07/2006 at 07:39 AM in Cronyism, HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Tomstown Scandal, Tom Delay Permalink Comments (2) TrackBack (0)
Sunday News Roundup
Ciro has raised over $136,000 from the "The Kiss." Cuellar starts to get desperate.

Chris Bell leads Gammage in a new DMN poll.

San Antonio Express New Editorial Board endorses Joe Farias for HD 118 primary.

Madla still hasn't let the Democrats out of his trunk.

San Antonio social conservative James Leininger trys to kill off moderate Republican by dropping almost $1 million of his own money to support right-wing extremists.

The Corpus Christi chapter of the American Federation of Teachers and Corpus Christi Fire Fighters Association endorse Juan Garcia (HD 32). The New York Times reports on the veterans running for Congress. There are 57 Dems running (map).

Dick Cheney's Freedom Peppering is still a mess.

Law enforcement officials in San Antonio and Alamo Heights are more likely to ask black motorists to submit to voluntary searches than they are to ask white drivers, according to a study (.pdf) released by an Texas Criminal Justice Coalition.

Posted by Eddie on 02/19/2006 at 10:31 AM in Back on the Ranch, CD 28, Cheneyquiddick, Download This!, Human Rights, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Race for Texas Governor 2006, SD 19, San Antonio, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House, The Lege - Senate Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (0)
Sometimes technical difficulties turn out to be a good thing.
Many of TRS’s reader were expecting a play by play of Juan Garcia’s Campaign Kick-Off Rally with Gen. Wesley Clark. We were intending of broadcasting the event with the help of Corpus Christi’s citywide WiFi network. Much to my chagrin, the signal was sporadic at best so I decided to post later and walk the crowd to get a sense of the energy.

It was the best thing that could of happened. I met a friend of the campaign who was filming and needed some help transporting video equipment throughout the night. He asked me to help “produce” and of course I agree to help.

Walking through a crowd of 200+, I felt something I hadn’t felt in a lot time: optimistic hope. I really believe it came from the presence of Clark and Garcia. I saw people who are natural skeptics smile and nod their head in agreement because they knew that they had in front of them a rebirth of Democrats. Candidates like Garcia and Clark is how Democrats earn back the trust of the voters.


Continue reading "Sometimes technical difficulties turn out to be a good thing. " »

Posted by Eddie on 01/29/2006 at 05:22 PM in Foreign Policy, HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Race for U.S. President 2008, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (10) TrackBack (0)
Juan Garcia's Rally Photos
Here are the photos of the Juan Garcia Campaign Rally with Gen. Wes Clark. I have also included some additional photos from tagging along with Wes and Juan. For the complete story, check the Sunday Edition of The Red State.

Posted by Eddie on 01/27/2006 at 08:57 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Race for U.S. President 2008, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (0)
~LIVE BLOG~ Juan Garcia & Gen. Welsey Clark
Greetings everyone. I am down here in Corpus Christi, the Sparkling City by the Sea. I will be providing live-coverage of the Juan Garcia's Kick Off Rally with Gen. Wesley Clark. Juan is running for State Representative in District 32. The rally is set to start at 4:30pm at the Selena Auditorium but if you are coming you should probably be here by 4:00pm.

It is late morning and I am blogging from the 2nd floor of the flagship Whataburger by the Bay store.

11:30am ~ Juan asked me to tag along this morning. First, he spoke to at the local meeting of the GI Forum. For those who do not know, the GI Forum was founded in Corpus Christi and one the first and most effective organizations to protect the rights of Mexican-American veterans and their families. The widow and daughter of founder, Dr. Hector P. Garcia, was at the breakfast and is expected to be in attendance at tonight's rally. Dr. Hector, as he is fondly called, was the recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Being from Corpus Christi, I have heard many of stories about Dr. Hector. Every single story I heard was about how Dr. Hector helped them when they most needed help.

After the breakfast, we then ran over to the local talk radio show for a quick interview. Juan talked about tonight's rally with Gen. Wesley Clark. The radio show host was real nice and helped point out that we were going to have a presidential candidate speaking tonight. This may be common place in bigger cities but in Corpus it is a special treat for everyone here.

More live coverage and photos after the jump. Comments are open

Continue reading "~LIVE BLOG~ Juan Garcia & Gen. Welsey Clark" »

Posted by Eddie on 01/26/2006 at 12:29 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Race for U.S. President 2008, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (5) TrackBack (2)
TRS to live-blog Juan Garcia's kick off rally with Gen. Clark
As noted on the Rio Grande Guardian and Democratic Underground, The Red State will be live-blogging Juan Garcia's kick off rally for his race for Texas House District 32 with honored guest Gen. Wesley Clark. I encourage everyone who can go to Corpus Christi this Thursday to attend the rally. These are the first steps of a great new candidate and the next step for a true contender for the White House. I expect great things from these two very accomplished men.

For those who cannot make it but want to ask Wes Clark or Juan Garcia a question, send it to TRS via email and we will do our best to get it asked.

UPDATE: Burnt Orange Report has an interview with Juan Garcia.


Posted by Eddie on 01/24/2006 at 06:01 AM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Race for U.S. President 2008, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (3) TrackBack (2)
Wesley Clark kicks off Juan Garcia's campaign

Gen. Wesley Clark, former presidential candidate and NATO's Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, will be in Corpus Christi, TX on January 26, 2006 to announce his support for Juan Garcia's race (campaign website) for Texas House District 32.

I cannot remember the last time a Presidential candidate visited our Sparkling City By The Sea. This is huge!

General Wesley Clark will join fellow veteran and state representative candidate Juan Garcia for a formal campaign kick-off rally on January 26 at the Selena Auditorium.

"I am honored to have General Clark's endorsement and strong support in my campaign to set a new direction for the families and small businesses of House District 32," Garcia said. "His biography and his record of commitment to our country speaks for itself."

During 34 years of service in the U.S. Army, Clark rose to the rank of four-star general as NATO's Supreme Allied Commander, and led the effort to end ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. He graduated first in his class at West Point, and was awarded the Silver Star for his gallantry in Vietnam. A Rhodes Scholar, he serves as a frequent commentator on FOX News. Clark won the 2004 Presidential primary in Oklahoma, and is viewed by many analysts as a strong contender for the White House in 2008. Garcia served under Clark's command during Kosovo, and the two men later became friends when Garcia was selected to serve as a White House Fellow, the nation's premiere leadership development program, whose alumni include Clark, Colin Powell and Henry Cisneros.

The rally is scheduled to be held from 4:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 26 in the Selena Auditorium. The event will be followed by a fundraising reception from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Full Press Release (.doc)

If you can attend the rally, GO! Corpus Christi is beautiful this time of year. If you can't go but want to help, then you can volunteer or contribute to his campaign. His new website (www.electjuangarcia.com) should have all the info.

I met Gen. Clark in 2003 and found him to no nonsense kind of guy. I have a pretty good BS meter with politicians and found him to be honest and forthright with his answers to questions. Given Clark's and Garcia's background, I think they are a great match. Clark's announcement will help bring out the important military vote in that district. This is a candidate you can be excited about...







UPDATE: WesPac has the event up on its calender.

Posted by Eddie on 01/17/2006 at 03:05 PM in Did he just say that?!?, HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (2)
Juan Garcia want all the votes not just Dems
In order for Juan Garcia to win House District 32, he must appeal not only to Democrats but moderate Republicans and Independents. This is a swing Republican district with a heavy military presence. I don't think you will ever win over the extreme right wing who are actively trying take out the moderate Republicans who vote their district like Carter Casteel. I think his impressive military background definitely will win over some conservative voters to his side. His latest press release announces his new campaign treasurer:

"Joe is a trusted friend who has served this community well and who understands the need to restore balance and independence at the State Capitol," Garcia said.

Hall is a former Marine, Desert Storm pilot, and registered Republican with an MBA degree from Texas A&M and a successful small Coastal Bend business. Hall and his wife, a public school teacher from Pearland, are respected community leaders.

“Juan is running to be part of the solution, not part of the problem,” Hall said. “He will be the kind of independent voice we need in Austin, not just another rubber stamp.” [Emphasis added]

I am glad that he going after all the votes not just some of them. The job of State Representative represents all the people in a district. Unfortunately, there are Reps out there who rather vote for the interest of the small group of fringe and radical Republicans instead of their district. I won't ever fault someone for voting their district 'cause that is their job (and most folks are in the happy middle).

Posted by Eddie on 01/06/2006 at 08:56 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (0)
My Day with Juan Garcia
Today is the one-year anniversary of the first real post on the The Red State. I tackled the cronyism I saw happening while I worked in the 2003 Texas Legislature. It's funny what a year can bring.

I was invited by Lt. Cmdr. Juan Garcia to join him in Austin today for his filing at the Democratic Party Headquarters. Since I have never been to a filing, I agreed to go.

I am so glad I did.

The HQ buzzed with activity with everyone moving with a purpose. It seemed a bit chaotic until you stopped and and watched it move. There were many folks from around the state bringing their paperwork to be filed. There were people with the means to do so comfortably. There were people who obvious first time candidates. It was a treat to see so many folks anxious to get their filings entered and made official.

Juan was quite comfortable meeting the party officials and staff. He has a very natural way with people. When they found out who he was, their faces lit up. They were happy he was there and that he was running. This was sincere since they had already heard that he had decided to run for HD 32.

I forget sometimes about the folks who dedicate their lives to help Democrats get elected. Many of the staff were in their mid to late 20s and obviously very bright. Most could be doing whatever they wanted to in life but have chosen to serve.

I pulled Juan aside to ask him about what he thought about all this and why he was running because he doesn't need to do this. He has a great education, a good job and a responsibility to his young family. This race will take him away from his family. He has already served his country in a way only a few among us can. His job as a navy pilot is probably one of the most dangerous jobs a person can do. And yet he still throws his hat in the ring.... He told me that it is all worth it if he can make Texas a better place for his family and Texas families' future. The sacrifice he makes will be far outweighed by the good he can achieve for them.

Juan Garcia's race is far bigger than HD 32. His run is a testament that Democrats can run supremely qualified candidates. His run sets the stage for what the future will hold for Texas Democrats. His run can inspire people to get involved and help create the new Democratic Party. His run will inspire others to run (in fact it has already). To some, this may seem like pie in the sky but once you meet him you will know what I am talking about.

At some point you have to stop gawking and complaining and do something about it. I was quite surprised when I was moved to do something about it myself. Somewhere amidst the the hustle and bustle of day, I decided to run. I said my goodbyes to all the good people at the Party, personally thanked Juan Garcia for running and went back home to San Antonio.

I called my good friend and asked him to run with me for Precinct Chair in our respective precincts. Neither of us had ever done anything like this before. He agreed to run. It is not as large of job as Juan will have but I believe it's important. We cannot wait for others make the change we would want. We have be that change ourselves.

Starting 1/2/06, I am officially running for Precinct Chair 4001 in Bexar County.

Posted by Eddie on 01/02/2006 at 11:28 PM in Austin, HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, San Antonio, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (1)
Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia to run for House District 32
THE RED STATE EXCLUSIVE

Putting rumors and speculation to rest, TRS has confirmed that Lt. Cmdr. Juan Garcia will run for Texas House District 32.

I first met Juan Garcia at the DNC Hispanic Leadership Summit in San Antonio earlier this year and I have spent quite a bit of time with him in last few months. Let me tell you about what I have learned.

Raised in South Texas, Juan has impressive credentials. U.C.L.A undergrad. J.D. from Harvard Law School (where he met his wife). Master's in Public Policy from Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government. White House Fellow. 13 years Navy fighter pilot with missions in Kosovo and the Persian Gulf.

Currently, he is a practicing attorney in Corpus Christi all while still training young Navy pilots. He was a Special Assistant to the U.S. Secretary of Education from 1999-2000, chaired the Board of Directors of "Citizens for Educational Excellence," and was a member of the CCISD district-wide Planning and Decision-Making Team. He also serves on the Board of Governors for Leadership Corpus Christi, the Dr. Hector P. Garcia Memorial Foundation, and the Boy Scouts.

If you ever get a chance to meet him in person, he is even more impressive than his resume. Now, this is going to be a tough race against the incumbent, the tragically named, Gene Seaman (R). Some may know him for being furniture in the Capitol but most remember him for his nasty little tirade (wmv clip) on the floor of the Texas House of Representatives during session in 2003.

Much more on this announcement once I land on the ground....


Posted by Eddie on 12/31/2005 at 04:09 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (1)
Recent Posts

Sunday, May 28, 2006

South Texas Chisme: Erasing the Hispanic vote

Juan more voice.....
Posted on May 29, 2006 at 01:28:04 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

raised infinitely to the power of South Texas for the ascension of Juan Garcia III to the Office of District 32 State Representative.

We can put this man into office.

We can defeat the insurance big money.

Well South Texas, it is now up to us.

When I woke up this morning, I did not even know WATT Juan Garcia III looked like much less who his supporters were.

Good People!

That is all I will say for now, GOOD PEOPLE!

Hey South Texas Democrats get over the bickering and the envy.

We got an election to win!

Join the Army of Juan.

Who are you Juan Garcia III?

Let's make South Texas Rumble.

More on this race (against the INSURANCE industry) coming to your community soon!


Now, in response to you Sam Sylvia; are you Sam or Sylvia?

Why did they throw that money out so suddenly?

They were challenged by who?

If you choose to do the pre historic block walking while the organizer hordes the bulk of the money, that is your choice.

It did Tony Sanchez absolutely no good. It helped Barbie Girl not one iota.

My talents are much more profound as an online advocate. I do mean WATT I say and say WATT I mean.

Read We The People May edition and if you still do not understand my reference then you must be totally "out of the loop". Those "in the know" understood perfectly. John Kelley knows exactly WATT I am referring to.

I thank you for your input and it is refreshing to experience individuality as you exhibit. I look forward to meeting you.

Both of you.

Suggestions?????

I have many suggestions and many fall on deaf ears.

When it comes to a Gazillionaires Club or an Elitist City Council controlling our political environment for their own personal interest; I will never "relax and enjoy it".

Very few people have spoken up for this man Juan Garcia III.

So We did right here and look WATT happened


Hey, Sam or Sylvia take a look at where the money goes and I bet somebody or a couple of somebodies will end up with a good chunk for themselves while somebody sweats their a$$ off for 6 bucks an hour. All it is, is an information gathering campaign with people speaking on behalf of three different candidates which puts Juan in the same boat with Jimmy and Larry.

Juan IMO is in a class a few tiers above these guys.

He is a class act with the charisma and energy required to represent South Texas' interest and not big money.

The Army just got a Weapon of Mass Construction!

Sunday, May 21, 2006

Why is the Equal Time Rule ignored by the South Texas Media & District Attorneys? Too Political?

U.S. RADIO AND TV STATIONS REQUIREDTO GIVE CANDIDATES EQUAL TIME
Under the First Amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing freedom of the press, radio and television stations in the United States have enormous latitude in their coverage of candidates and elections. But according to experts, one regulation that has remained, and is likely to remain, is the Equal Time rule.
Under a provision of the 1934 Communications Act, if a broadcast station provides time for one political candidate, it must do so for his or her opponents. This provision -- Section 315 of the law -- is known as the Equal Time rule. It states: "If any licensee shall permit any person who is a legally qualified candidate for any political office to use a broadcasting station, he shall afford equal opportunities to all other such candidates for that office in the use of such broadcasting station."
It is a simple concept, but interpretation of the Equal Time rule has evolved over the years as politics and technology have changed. It continues to evolve. In a recent interview, Robert Baker, of the political program section of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the government regulatory agency for the U.S. communications industry, said that "the three principal components of the rule are a requirement that if broadcasters sell time to political candidates they must treat them all equally, allow them to purchase time at favorable rates and not attempt to censor the content of their ads."
In addition to paid political advertising, the law also applies to some programs paid for by the stations in which candidates may appear without purchasing the airtime. Baker explained that as a result of an amendment to Section 315 in 1959, the rule does not apply to regular news and public affairs programming. Thus, if a "legally qualified" candidate appears on a bona fide news program, the station is under no obligation to provide time to other candidates.
The question of what is a bona fide news program, however, at a time when news and entertainment are often mixed in the same program is a subject of much debate in the communications industry. According to Dwight Teeter and Don Duc, authors of Law of Mass Communications, the FCC "has expanded its category of broadcast programs exempted from political access requirements to include entertainment shows that provide news or current event coverage as regularly scheduled segments of the program."
The act stipulates certain requirements for a candidate to be "legally qualified," the most important of which is that he or she be a declared candidate in accordance with applicable state and federal laws. According to broadcast historians, one of the most celebrated tests of this aspect of the rule occurred in December 1967 when the three major commercial television networks carried an hour-long interview with President Lyndon Johnson, a Democrat. It was only a few months before the New Hampshire primary, the first major test in the 1968 race for the presidency.
Eugene McCarthy, who had announced his own candidacy for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination before the broadcast, requested "equal time" from the networks on the grounds that President Johnson was a legally qualified candidate for the same nomination. The appeal was denied because Johnson had not, at that point, declared that he was a candidate for reelection. This is one reason why candidates time an announcement that they are running for office very carefully, so as not to trigger the Equal Time rule requiring stations to give broadcast time in equal measure to their opponents.
There are certain, narrow exceptions to the Equal Time rule that have evolved over the years, however. The most important exception concerns national televised debates involving the major presidential candidates. Not long after debates among the leading candidates for president became a standard component of campaigns in 1976, the FCC moved to exempt them from the Equal Time rule.
Since November 1983, the FCC has allowed the debates to be considered "bona fide news events," thus triggering the exemption. Under the old rule, even minor candidates could have requested equal time during the presidential debates, a problem that led organizations, such as the League of Women Voters, to cover the debates, which the networks then covered as news events. Baker explained that although there is now no requirement that all candidates be included in the presidential debates, the FCC has urged broadcasters not to "favor or disfavor" any particular candidate.
Although the Equal Time rule is concerned with equal access, not initial access, for candidates, a 1979 ruling by the FCC, in effect, required stations to give candidates for federal office "reasonable access" to the airwaves. The case resulted from a request by then-President Jimmy Carter to buy airtime for his reelection campaign. The networks denied the request on the grounds that no equal time provision was at issue and it was too early in the campaign. The FCC, and ultimately the Supreme Court, ruled that the networks should have provided the time. This is now known as the "reasonable access" rule.
In the past, the Equal Time rule was often confused with the Fairness Doctrine, which required that broadcasters "operate in the public interest and afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public interest." The Fairness Doctrine ceased to be a requirement in 1987. Baker explained that although a few minor elements remain, "essentially the Fairness Doctrine was abolished."
Critics have complained that since the Fairness Doctrine was shelved, stations have become less responsible in the coverage of issues. But opponents of the Fairness Doctrine say it was an unnecessary regulatory requirement on broadcasters that other media, such as newspapers, were never required to meet. Since there are now many more broadcast stations than newspapers, opponents say viewers have enough choice on coverage of issues without regulation, especially in an age of hundreds of stations courtesy of cable and satellite television companies.
As new democracies around the world wrestle with issues of regulation in broadcasting to ensure fairness for political candidates in elections, the U.S. experience is an indication that even simple rules are not always easy to implement in practice and must be periodically reevaluated in the light of changing circumstances, both technological as well as political.

Thursday, May 18, 2006

Sounds like somebody is pissed cuz they cant hunt Mexicans? You know a little bloodshed!

curmudgeon
Posts: 2851

Solomon's parents were wetbacks . . .
5/18/2006 8:48:17 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . are you surprised he would be against stopping the invasion from Mexico?


Collapse all posts in this thread
Author Replys
CommonSense
Posts: 491
Re: Solomon''s parents were wetbacks . . .
5/18/2006 9:08:39 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wasn''t buying his crap. He doesn''t want the National Guard on the border because they are trained for war? What a bunch of bull. Like I told Eric yesterday, many of these guys are combat vets and they aren''t going to be ""trigger happy"". Who else would be better at guarding the line than these folks.

He also made the comparison to the Berlin wall. Either he is just plain ignorant or he is just plain ignorant. Take your pick. The fence or wall will not stop illegals. It will slow them down.

After Solomon being in DC for so long, I do believe that he is out of touch with his constituants.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2851

Did you really expect . . .
5/18/2006 9:20:12 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . him to say that he was for amnesty and against the wall because his parents were from Mexico?
CommonSense
Posts: 491
Re: Did you really expect . . .
5/18/2006 9:35:03 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No... not really. I did expect him to side with this country as a sovereign nation that has borders that need to be enforced.

The way I see it, is he is treating this like the country peddlers show. You pay to get in, get your hand stamped, and then you can do anything you want. Heck, you can even leave and come back.
curtis rock
Posts: 698

Re: Re: Did you really expect . . .
5/18/2006 9:51:25 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can''t seriously believe that Solomon understands sovereignty and borders do you?

I''ve noticed that every time I have a viewpoint on an issue, I can pretty much count on most politicians not in agreement.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2851

Solomon understands . . .
5/18/2006 9:53:55 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . it alright, he just doesn''t agree with it.
CommonSense
Posts: 491
Re: Re: Re: Did you really expect . . .
5/18/2006 9:56:49 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. That is why I believe most are out of touch with what their constituants really want.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2851

Solomon also knows . . .
5/18/2006 9:59:14 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . what his constitients want, most of whom have ancestors who came from Mexico.
Elwood Blues
Posts: 250

Re: Re: Solomon''s parents were wetbacks . . .
5/18/2006 11:22:47 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
""After Solomon being in DC for so long,I do believe that he is out of touch with his constituants"".

He''s BEEN out of touch for a long time,CS.He''s spent the last four to five years pandering to Brownsville''s interests while ignoring ours..why?.. because he knows that we can''t throw him out of office.His district is so gerrymandered that if we here voted against him 8-1,he''d still win re-election as long as he carries Brownsville and Cameron County.

He couldn''t care less what people here think of him,he coudn''t care less whether anybody here votes for him or not..as long as he''s got the Valley in his ass pocket,he knows we''re stuck with him,and there''s not a damned thing we can do about it.When''s the last time you saw ""Smilin Sol"" debate an opponent? When''s the last time you saw him defend his abysmal voting record..to ANYBODY? You won''t,either.He doesn''t have to answer to anybody here and he knows it.
Wild Ape
Posts: 2724

It is outrageous
5/18/2006 12:09:56 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How can anyone fight this much widespread corruption. It isn''t that he goes against what I think, it is that this country can be so easily subverted.
HardcoreHarry
Posts: 1739

Re: Re: Re: Solomon''s parents were wetbacks . . .
5/18/2006 12:20:35 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn''t have said it better myself Elwood!

I turned on the radio in the truck this morning and the first thing I thought was: Why is Homer Villareal on the radio on Thursdays? I kid you not! Solomon and Homer''s voices could be interchangeable as to the unity of and indistinguishable significance of the messages they work to get across. Thusly, this translates into the fact that both are operating on the same apparent agenda. Together they are Frick and Frack.

Hardcore Harry

LONEWOLF
Posts: 422
Hey -- Was That...
5/18/2006 12:02:32 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...you that called in right after Solomon left??

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Nueces De La Parra: Sexual Harrasment @ Del Mar and now Teresa Cox fired. AGAIN>

Monday, May 15, 2006

Transparent & Electronic Justice and the Nueces County Courthouse State of the Art or a Clandestine Venue of Glass without the Art?

Jaime Kenedeño said...
Who can produce the Alvarez supporters?

Who Are You Rose Vela?

Who Are You Federico Hinojosa?

Who are You Jim Kaelin?

Who Are You Jimmy Rodriguez?

Who Are You Guy Williams?

Who Are You Marisela Saldana?

Who Are You Robert Zamora?

Who Are You Tom Greenwell?

Who Are You James Sales?

Who Are You Bobby Galvan?

Why should my audience vote for you?

Yes or no?

Can you name one positive point about your opponent?

Yes or no?

If yes

well you can imagine the interview?

Can I remain objective?

Yes or No?

Who Are You James Klager?

Who Are You David Jones?

Who Are You Carolyn Moon?

Who Are You Larry Cox?

Who Are You Pedro Cavazos?

Who Are You Patsy Perez?

We will display You in the Light with the utmost eloquent of exposure to your(uniquely positive) campaign.

And let's keep it clean!

Except with Neal.

He always plays dirty.

And acts CLEAN.

Go figure???

1:44 AM

South Texas Chisme: Chisme roundup

South Texas Chisme: Political Pulse notes

Saturday, May 13, 2006

Remember George Moff? WATT about complicity (cosigner Canales)"

NUMBER 13-02-123-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
GEORGE MOFF , Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.
___________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 94th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.
__________________________________________________________________
O P I N I O N
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Amidei (1)
Opinion by Justice Rodriguez
Appellant George Moff brings this appeal following a conviction for theft by a public servant of property valued between $500.00 and $1,500.00. By three issues, appellant generally contends the evidence was legally insufficient to support: (1) appellant's conviction; (2) the fair market value of the stolen property; and (3) appellant's status as a public servant at the time of the theft. We affirm.
I. Facts
Appellant was hired as Chief Appraiser for the Nueces County Appraisal District (the District) in 1981 by the District's Board of Directors (the Board). After eighteen years of service, appellant resigned as chief appraiser in December 1999. Before he left, appellant paid the District $1,100.00 for property he had in his possession. The Board hired Ollie Grant to replace appellant as the chief appraiser.
In March 2000, Grant prepared an inventory of the District's property and found certain items missing. In April 2000, appellant met Grant at a local restaurant, and returned several items that belonged to the District. (2) Because of the discrepancy in the inventory and actions by appellant, the Nueces County District Attorney's office (D.A.) began a formal investigation. The D.A. contacted Texas Ranger Roberto Garza, Jr., to assist in the investigation of appellant. In June 2000, appellant's attorney returned additional District items that had been in appellant's possession. (3) These items were returned to Ranger Garza.
In May 2001, appellant was indicted for third degree felony theft by a public servant of property valued between $1,500.00 and $20,000.00. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. §§ 31.03(a), (e)(4), (f)(1), & 31.09 (Vernon 2003). However, the jury found appellant guilty of the lesser included offense of theft by a public servant of property valued between $500.00 and $1,500.00, a state jail felony. See id. §§ 31.03(a), (e)(3), (f)(1), & 31.09 (Vernon 2003). The trial court assessed punishment at one year incarceration, suspended, and a $4,000.00 fine. This appeal ensued.
II. Sufficiency of the evidence
A. Standard of Review
In reviewing legal sufficiency, we look at all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); Vasquez v. State, 67 S.W.3d 229, 236 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). As fact finder, the jury is the exclusive judge of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be afforded to their testimony. Chambers v. State, 805 S.W.2d 459, 461 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The jury may use common sense and apply common knowledge, observation, and experience gained in the ordinary affairs of life when giving effect to the inferences that may be reasonably drawn from the evidence. Booker v. State, 929 S.W.2d 57, 60 (Tex. App.-Beaumont 1996, pet. ref'd). In conducting our analysis, we may not re-weigh the evidence and substitute our judgment for that of the jury. King v. State, 29 S.W.3d 556, 562 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The standard is the same for both direct and circumstantial evidence cases. Kutzer v. State, 994 S.W.2d 180, 184 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Vela v. State, 771 S.W.2d 659, 660 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1989, pet. ref'd).
B. Appellant's Conviction
By his first issue, appellant contends the evidence is legally insufficient to prove he unlawfully appropriated property belonging to the District. Specifically, appellant challenges the "unlawfulness" of his appropriation of the property in question.
A person commits theft if he "unlawfully appropriates property with intent to deprive the owner of property," and such appropriation is unlawful if "it is without the owner's effective consent." Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 31.03(a) & (b)(1) (Vernon 2003). Appropriation means "to acquire or otherwise exercise control over property . . . ." Id. § 31.01(4) (Vernon 2003). Appellant contends the State failed to prove that appellant's acquisition and control over the property in question was without the consent of the District. We disagree.
In cases alleging theft of property by an employee or fiduciary, theft may be established by showing the accused did not have authority to dispose of or appropriate the property in the manner alleged. Huff v. State, 897 S.W.2d 829, 834 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1995, pet. ref'd). Thus, theft is established by showing the accused acted in a way inconsistent with his lawful authority. Id.; see Freeman v. State, 707 S.W.2d 597, 605 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). When the accused "decides, for whatever reason, to unlawfully and permanently deprive the lawful owner of the property, he is then acting in an unauthorized capacity . . . . The line between lawful and unlawful activity by an employee [or fiduciary] is therefore a question of the scope of his authority." Freeman, 707 S.W.2d at 605-06; see Huff, 897 S.W.2d at 834; Bailey v. State, 885 S.W.2d 193, 197-98 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1994, pet. ref'd).
Looking at the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, Jackson, 443 U.S. at 319;Vasquez, 67 S.W.3d at 236, the evidence shows appellant did not have consent to take the District's property home. Although there was not a written rule restricting the chief appraiser from taking District property home and storing it there, board member Ronnie Canales gave testimony that he did not give appellant such consent. Moreover, although the Board consented to and co-signed checks used to purchase the property in question, Ranger Garza testified that at least one board member did not know he was approving the purchase of a satellite dish when he co-signed a check for its purchase. Ranger Garza testified that when appellant wanted approval and a check for the satellite dish, appellant told the Board that the purchase was for office supplies. Board member Canales did not know he was co-signing a check for a satellite dish.
Furthermore, Grant testified that he had never seen any of the items appellant returned to him. Grant also testified that a majority of the items returned through appellant's attorney were items not normally used in the appraisal business and the District would not have had a use for them. The evidence also showed that when Grant asked appellant about a missing computer, appellant denied having one. The next day, however, appellant called Grant and asked him how much it would cost for appellant to buy the computer he previously denied possessing. The computer was later returned to Ranger Garza by appellant's attorney. Moreover, appellant asked Kevin Parker, a general contractor for the District, to return tools to the District, tools appellant had in his possession. When Parker told appellant he did not have a key to get into the District building, appellant asked Parker to see if Timothy Pendergraft, director of data processing for the District, would return the tools for appellant. Pendergraft refused to assist appellant in returning the tools.
We find this evidence supports the jury's finding that appellant exceeded his lawful authority as chief appraiser. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. §§ 31.03(a), (e)(3), (f)(1), & 31.09; see also Freeman, 707 S.W.2d at 605-06; Huff, 897 S.W.2d at 834; Bailey, 885 S.W.2d at197-98. The evidence is clear that as chief appraiser, appellant had authority to purchase and possess property for the District. However, the evidence also shows appellant exceeded this authority by taking the property home and retaining the property for months after his resignation, and by purchasing items that could not be, or were not, used for District business. Moreover, it seems appellant knew he had exceeded his authority by his efforts in having others return certain items, denying he had possession of the computer when confronted about it, and acting in a deceiving manner when getting the Board to approve and co-sign a check for the purchase of the satellite dish. See Margraves v. State, 34 S.W.3d 912, 919 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000) (jury's inference of intent is afforded more deference than evidence supporting proof of conduct, and circumstantial evidence of defendant's knowledge is not required to meet same rigorous criteria as circumstantial proof of other elements).
Thus, we find the evidence sufficiently shows appellant had the intention to, and did, unlawfully appropriate the District's property. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. §§ 31.03(a), (e)(3), (f)(1), & 31.09; see also Freeman, 707 S.W.2d at 605-06; Huff, 897 S.W.2d at 834; Bailey, 885 S.W.2d at 197-98. Appellant's first issue is overruled.
C. Value of the Property
By his second issue, appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to support the fair market value of the property. We find it unnecessary to reach appellant's contention because error, if any, was waived.
Appellant failed to properly object to the State's method of proving the value of the items unlawfully appropriated by appellant. The only objections made by appellant were for hearsay and lack of predicate. Even then, the objections came after the State had already established the values of four separate items. "If the manner of proving an item's value does not meet the accused's approval, it is incumbent upon him to voice his objection at the time of the introduction of the testimony." Brown v. State, 640 S.W.2d 275, 279 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982); Garcia v. State, 787 S.W.2d 185, 185 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1990, no. pet.). Error presented on appeal will not be considered if it varies from the specific objections made during trial. Garcia, 787 S.W.2d at 185. We find appellant's objections were insufficient to inform the trial court that appellant was complaining of the State's method of proving the value of the items. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1. Appellant's second issue is overruled.
D. Public Servant
By his third issue, appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to prove appellant was a public servant after he resigned as chief appraiser. If he should be found guilty, appellant argues, the offense should be a misdemeanor and not a state jail felony. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 31.03 (e)(3), (f)(1) (offense rises to state jail felony if actor was public servant at time of offense and property came into actor's possession, custody, or control by virtue of his status as public servant). This argument has no merit.
We have already found sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict that appellant unlawfully appropriated District property while he was employed as the District's chief appraiser. However, we do not find any evidence to suggest appellant unlawfully misappropriated District property after he resigned as chief appraiser. The fact that appellant still had possession of District property after he resigned, does not negate the fact that when he initially came into possession and control of the property, appellant was a public servant. See id. § 31.03(f)(1). Appellant's third issue is overruled.
III. Conclusion
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ
Justice
Publish .
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Opinion delivered and filed
this 5th day of June, 2003.
1. Former Justice Maurice Amidei assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 74.003 (Vernon 1998).
2. These items included: (1) a thirty-five millimeter camera; (2) automotive battery charger; (3) a power washer; and (4) a drill and saw set.
3. These items included: (1) a digital camera; (2) a bit box; (3) an espresso and cappuccino maker; (4) an engine starter; (5) light bulbs; (6) a rechargeable power pack; (7) a power center for power tool rechargers; (8) jumper cables; (9) a horsepower clamp; (10) speaking Spanish software; (11) arcade games software; (12) ratchet tie-downs; (13) a satellite dish; (14) two remote controls; (15) computer cables; (16) a battery charger; (17) a satellite controller box; (18) a printer/scanner; (19) a copier machine; (20) two printers; (21) a television; (22) a vacuum cleaner; (23) computer and software; (24) floor jack; (25) dolly; (26) motion detector; (27) security light; (28) ear-plugs; (29) batteries; (30) zoom lens; (31) a digital multimeter; (32) a hammer; (33) a tool set; (34) a global positioning system; (35) a masonry blade; (36) a ratchet set; (37) an outlet power strip; (38) a set of booster cables; and (39) two tool boxes.