Friday, June 27, 2008

The wind or The Swift Hand of God? He has a way of letting us know exactly who is in charge.........................

George Gongora/Caller-Times Law enforcement officers inspect a car belonging to 105th District Court Judge J. Manuel Bañales on Thursday near the Interstate 37/Padre Island Drive interchange. Rescuers had to cut the roof and doors off the Cadillac DeVille to free Bañales, who, along with the transportation worker struck, was taken to the Christus Spohn Hospital Memorial.
George Gongora/Caller-Times Law enforcement officers inspect a car belonging to 105th District Court Judge J. Manuel Bañales on Thursday near the Interstate 37/Padre Island Drive interchange. Rescuers had to cut the roof and doors off the Cadillac DeVille to free Bañales, who, along with the transportation worker struck, was taken to the Christus Spohn Hospital Memorial.

A local judge's car hit a transportation department worker crouching near his truck about to fix a sign Thursday afternoon, sending the worker to the hospital in critical condition, police said.

A Texas Department of Transportation heavy-duty pickup with a cherry-picker lift was parked near a ramp connecting Padre Island Drive to southbound Interstate 37 when J. Manuel Bañales, 105th District Court judge and presiding judge of the Fifth Judicial Administrative District, entered the ramp. His gold Cadillac Deville slid off the pavement and struck the truck parked a few feet away on the grass.

Two workers had just pulled over to fix a small, directional black and yellow sign about 2:45 p.m., said police Capt. John Houston, when one worker spotted the Cadillac heading straight for the truck and jumped out of the way. Another worker, 34 years old, wasn't able to move.

"He was hit with the full force of the vehicle," Houston said. "He's injured head to toe."

That worker was rushed to Christus Spohn Hospital Memorial with life-threatening injuries. Late Thursday he was in emergency surgery and on a ventilator. Bañales' injuries are not believed to be life-threatening, police said. He was taken to the same hospital.

The ramp was closed until about 6 p.m. as Corpus Christi police and Texas Department of Public Safety troopers cataloged the accident.

Houston said officers responded to the accident just like any other of the same severity, and state troopers were called in to help re-create the accident.

It wasn't clear Thursday afternoon how fast the Cadillac was going or what caused the accident, Houston said.

The Cadillac came to rest in the wrong direction, with its roof and doors removed with the Jaws of Life. The truck was some 50 yards away, pushed halfway up an embankment to another ramp by the force of impact.

As officers combed the road and car, a yellow grate from the pickup with three orange cones and a water cooler sat a few feet away from the car's front bumper. The worker who jumped out of the way was just about to set up the cones when the car struck, a transportation department spokesman said.

Bañales has been a district judge for 21 years. As presiding judge of the Fifth Judicial Administrative District, he assigns judges to cases when the regular judge is unavailable.

Contact David Kassabian at 886-3778 or kassabiand@caller.com

You must follow these rules in order to post comments:

* 1. Keep it clean.Comments that are obscene, vulgar, lewd or sexually-oriented will get the ax. Creative spelling of such terms also will be banned.
* 2. Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
* 3. Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything.
* 4. Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
* 6. Keep it local. Do not post direct links to sites outside of Caller.com.
* 7. Police yourselves. Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
* 8. Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
* 9. Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
* 10. Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
* 11.Help us get it right. If you find a factual error or misspelling, email newmedia@caller.com or metrodesk@caller.com, or call 886-3697.

(173) User Comments:
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 389468 on June 6, 2008 at 5:04 a.m.

How horrible!
Was alcohol involved?
related links Posted by 240665 on June 6, 2008 at 5:27 a.m.

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 232854 on June 6, 2008 at 5:57 a.m.

was he drinking, thats the first question everyone else is asked.........
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 401467 on June 6, 2008 at 6:10 a.m.

He'll probably show up for court. He loves to send people to prison for drinking.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712045 on June 6, 2008 at 6:26 a.m.

First, prayers for the young man seriously injured. May God be with him and his family. Second, I am glad Banales was not seriously injured but I wonder if Banales was speeding or perhaps on his cell phone and not paying attention. I hope DPS does a full investigation and does not form a biased opinion based on the fact that he is a judge.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 240803 on June 6, 2008 at 6:30 a.m.

My prayers for the injured state employee and his family.

All you people care about is for the judge to be intoxicated.
I can't believe the heartless and non compassionate souls that exist in this world.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 449075 on June 6, 2008 at 6:33 a.m.

Being a judge should be secondary in this situation. He is not in control of the investigation. I hope he was not on his cell phone, maybe this is a good example of what happens when you try to multitask while driving. May God be with the injuried man and his family. A full investigation should be performed and being a judge is no excuse for failure to CONTROL you vehicle.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 412890 on June 6, 2008 at 6:35 a.m.

sounds like one of our law biding officials was carring some excess speed going into that ramp. He had to have to knock that TDOT truck the distance TV news said.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 389468 on June 6, 2008 at 6:35 a.m.

We don't know if alcohol was involved or if the Judge was preoccupied or if it was merely a bad patch of road, but it's not beyond the real of possibilities for two types of justice in Nueces County . . . Bryan Smith? Mauricio Cellis?
Let's just hope a REAL investigation takes place and that the public is informed, both these men are public servants.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711681 on June 6, 2008 at 6:37 a.m.

I can't guess on whether or not he was drinking, but in my estimation: Judge Banales was probably speeding. In order for a mid-size car to send a much larger parked truck "approximately 50 yards" and "up an embankment" after impact, I would assume a high rate of speed. I would guess since he's on a ramp with advisory speeds (probably at 40MPH), that he was going much faster than that and that's how he also probably lost control.

I wish the report would state which ramp exactly Judge Banales was entering. There's one flyover ramp that heads towards Calallen and another ramp that heads towards Downtown. I'd like to know where the TxDOT truck was parked, and where Banales veered off the pavement.

I saw the accident yesterday when I was leaving work, and it looked horrible. The entire roof of the mid-size car was destroyed, and I was thinking that driver was seriously injured or killed.

My prayers go out to the TxDOT worker,. I hope he recovers fully. I also hope Judge Banales is doing well.

Curtis Rock
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 259150 on June 6, 2008 at 6:51 a.m.

Maybe now the Judge will know that accidents CAN happen. Hope the TxDot workers pulls out of this with no long-term effects. Because of the media attention I'm sure the Judge will be citing for "failure to control" his vehicle and/or "driver inattention".
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 240803 on June 6, 2008 at 6:59 a.m.

in response to 401467

I believe sending people to prison for drinking is Judge Banales job. If they don't get punished then it's the "judges are too soft on criminals" complaint.
Wheather he loves to send people to prison I would'nt know.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 233106 on June 6, 2008 at 7:11 a.m.

37 accidents now in the past 15 months for county employees?

Sounds reckless. Will a full investigation checking for drugs and alcohol be done?

Wasn't there a court manager a few years ago charged with a felony because of a cell phone and an accident?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 239123 on June 6, 2008 at 7:25 a.m.

Post 233106, I believe it was because of make up. She was putting on her makeup that caused an accident.

My prayers go out to the TXDot employee. Also to Judge Banales.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 240803 on June 6, 2008 at 7:39 a.m.

Yes, accidents do happen. However when a person makes the choice to get in the drivers seat of a vehicle, while under the influence of alcohol or drugs then thats no accident.
I am sure for all of you anxiously awaiting toxicology reports on the judge, maybe you won't be disappointed. Seems some of you are wishing for the worst
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 240354 on June 6, 2008 at 7:44 a.m.

so many of you jump to conclusions on what happend. maybe you should be out there doing the investigation. Maybe he had a heart attack and lost control? you never know, but so many of you are sure that it was alcohol related. your minds are filled with so much negativity and so many people hate to live here because of you.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 246492 on June 6, 2008 at 7:46 a.m.

in response to 240354

Well said and painfully true.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 389468 on June 6, 2008 at 7:50 a.m.

We weren't the ones driving the car.
We weren't the ones who hit that poor TXDOT worker.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 245928 on June 6, 2008 at 7:52 a.m.

omg, bloggeristas !!! Posting privileges removed yesterday have been restored and here we go with speculations, such as faulty tires on the Cadillac. Sheesh, to survive after being slammed that hard and trapped that badly. God bless the TxDOT employee and Judge Banales and all the families and friends.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 699448 on June 6, 2008 at 8:06 a.m.

My prayers go out to Judge Banales AND the TXDOT worker as well as their families.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 592398 on June 6, 2008 at 8:12 a.m.

May God be with all involved. I am sure that Judge Banales and his family feel horrible. Come on folks, accidents happen and we have no idea why this one happened.

Maybe he was headed back to work, maybe this or maybe that, but lets wait until the investigation is done.

My son went to school with his daugter and I personally think Judge Banales is a awesome individual. And no I am not hispanic so don't go there. He was very involved with his kids and I think as a judge he is fair.

Keeping everyone involved in my prayers.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 699733 on June 6, 2008 at 8:16 a.m.

Some of you all are so stupid. Judge Banales is a fair judge and you all need to give him the benefit of the doubt. He could have been having trouble breathing, having a heart attack or even having a stroke. You all don't know that but you all are just assuming that he was drunk. Instead of being so narrowed minded you all should pray for the TXDOT worker and for Judge Banales as we don't know what actually happened. My prayers got out to Judge Banales and for the TXDOT worker and the families.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 233517 on June 6, 2008 at 8:17 a.m.

I like Judge Banales.
I wish this young TX Dot worker well and hopefully a full and speedy recovery.
Maybe the Judge just lost control of his car when he noticed the parked vehicle. Did anyone ever think about that? Remember, Banales is the Judge who is trying to keep your kids safe from sex offenders, so before you go bashing him without knowing the facts, remember, he is a good judge.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 263127 on June 6, 2008 at 8:18 a.m.

Surely authorities administered a breathilizer test to theJudge to allay any future questions by the public about his sobriety. There is no question that a high rate of speed was involved, and there are strict laws regarding caution in work or construction zones. The Judge clearly was the at-fault party to the accident. Judges and Law Enforcement are held to a higher standard than those they serve, so the public will expect a thorough and fair review of his case. In the meantime our wish is for a full and complete recovery by both parties. God be with them.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 238309 on June 6, 2008 at 8:20 a.m.

Time to retire; in jail, maybe?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712812 on June 6, 2008 at 8:26 a.m.

i hope judge banales ok. what bothers me is how the news reported the story. to me, it seems the main part of the story was all about judge banales being in a car accident. the story should focus on the fact that a person (txdot worker) was almost killed. my heart goes out to the worker's family. it seems that the judge was driving at an unsafe speed. judge banales will have to live the rest of his life knowing he almost killed someone....and that is heavy.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 237538 on June 6, 2008 at 8:28 a.m.

this is pompous judge..it is mandatory to DPS to take a blood draw if there is a death or possiblity of a death in an auto accident..
lets see fit they did.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 235683 on June 6, 2008 at 8:34 a.m.

I'm just suprised some of you even know how to turn on a computer...
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 235519 on June 6, 2008 at 8:34 a.m.

Many of the above comments indeed have merit, BUT lest we forget, Judge Banales and the gentleman clinging on to life are both sons, brothers, husbands and I know the Judge is a Father, we as fellow humans should be less critical and opiniated if we are unfamiliar with the entire situation.

Please be more considerate in comments made.
In the interim, pray for their recovery.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 700159 on June 6, 2008 at 8:37 a.m.

My prayers for the TX Dot worker and his family as well as Judge Banales. I can only imagine how he must feel. I will keep everyone affected by this in my prayers.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 245407 on June 6, 2008 at 8:49 a.m.

Judge Banales is a respected Lawyer, and Judge.

He is not immune from any investigation, HE WOULD BE THE FIRST TO REQUEST AN INVESTIGATION INTO HIS ACTIONS.

I very seriously doubt alcohol was involved, knowing the judge the way I do.

As for the Tx DOT worker, MY DEEPEST PRAYERS FOR YOUR SAFE AND FULL RECOVERY !

SOMETIMES ACCIDENTS HAPPEN, SOMETIMES BAD THINGS HAPPEN TO GOOD PEOPLE, WE SHOULD NOT BE SO QUICK TO BLAME OR LAY BLAME, OR ASSUME THE WORSE.

PRAYERS TO ALL OF THE FAMILY MEMBERS INVOLVED.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 269677 on June 6, 2008 at 8:52 a.m.

You do not hear anything about a ticket or any charges? If this was anyone other than a judge. At least failure to maintain control. But nothing.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711504 on June 6, 2008 at 8:53 a.m.

My prayers are with both the Judge and the worker.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 241503 on June 6, 2008 at 8:54 a.m.

"A Texas Department of Transportation heavy-duty pickup with a cherry-picker lift was parked near a ramp ...The truck was some 50 yards away, pushed halfway up an embankment to another ramp by the force of impact."

COME ON! Banales must have been doing a very very high rate of speed to cause a heavy duty CHERRY PICKER truck to be PUSHED HALFWAY UP AN EMBANKMENT!

If the TxDot worker dies, Judge Banales needs to go to prison for vehicular manslaughter. He needs to at least step down and serve some jail time for what he has done so far. I sincerely hope this investigation is not muddied by politicians trying to protect him.

I don't know the man but I do want to see justice service equally with the same veracity he used while being a district court judge. I'm tired of seeing local 'politicos' get a slap on the hand for serious crimes while regular folks like us get the book thrown at us. Judge Banales had a strong reputation for throwning books.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 708377 on June 6, 2008 at 8:56 a.m.

Does anyone know if it had been raining in this area yesterday afternoon? It rained on I37 and towards Calallen yesterday afternoon, but I don't know if it rained closer to town. If it did, those ramps would have been filled with oil and extremely slick. Those ramps are death traps after just a little bit of rain. If he took that turn a little to fast he would have went out of control, which is what looks like happened. No One has said that he was drunk or that alchol was involved at all so let's let the police do their job and not speculate.

To the TXDot worker...My prayers are with you and your family! Get well soon...
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 351711 on June 6, 2008 at 8:58 a.m.

I heard that the sherrif seemed more concerned about the Judge condition then the poor Gentleman that got hit...... according to the interview they had yesterday.... I didn't see it, but heard about it from more than one person. If that is true, how sad.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 351711 on June 6, 2008 at 9:03 a.m.

Our hearts go out to the Victims and their Familys and to the Judges Family as well, hoping a speedy recovery for all.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 240926 on June 6, 2008 at 9:12 a.m.

WELL, LET'S JUST HANG THE JUDGE BY HIS THUMBS AND BEAT HIM. I CAN'T BELIEVE HOW SMALL MINDED SOME OF YOU THUGS ARE. JUST BECAUSE YOU DRIVE DRUNK AND UNDER THE INFLUENCE DOES NOT MEAN THE JUDGE WOULD. I'M SORRY THE DOT GUY GOT HIT, BUT I FEEL QUITE SURE THE JUDGE IS QUITE UPSET ABOUT IT TOO. GIVE THE JUDGE A CHANCE. YOU PEOPLE JUST LOVE TO HOPE FOR THE WORST FOR ANYONE IN AUTHORITY. HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE PERFECT???????
related links Posted by 329691 on June 6, 2008 at 9:13 a.m.

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 329691 on June 6, 2008 at 9:22 a.m.

Let's show a little more compassion for the victim in the hospital. Heaven knows how long he will be laid up as for the judge he's banged up but he'll recover, buy a new car and go to work. Will the victim recover? What about his family?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 374265 on June 6, 2008 at 9:25 a.m.

He will probably get away with it, and in the meantime, that TxDOT worker will never be the same, if he lives.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 323020 on June 6, 2008 at 9:26 a.m.

It 's obvious that the cause was failure to control speed,but they indicate they are unable to determine the cause. He'll probably get away with losing a few hours of vacation time like the police chief.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 442726 on June 6, 2008 at 9:27 a.m.

I am a friend of the worker and his family. It seems there is so much more concern about the judge, whose injuries were not life threatening, than for the person fighting for his life in the hospital. My heart and prayers go out to my friend and his family.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 240803 on June 6, 2008 at 9:27 a.m.

in response to 351711

I've heard alot of things too, that does not make them true. We don't know about Sherrif Kaelin's concerns or feelings from what we hear.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 240593 on June 6, 2008 at 9:36 a.m.

there is so much animosity on here for judge banales.... i take it that most of you all have had a loved one or yourself, perhaps, sentenced by this judge!!!
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 231171 on June 6, 2008 at 9:39 a.m.

Prayers to all involved-it sounds like the judge is going to be ok and hopefully the TxDot worker can somehow pull through.

As for that area, like many others in this city, people drive like "bats outta hell"-so I am not surprised that this has happened and am surprised that it doesn't happen more often. CCPD, who I usually support, never seems to catch the fools who fly around the city at 95 mph in a 30 mph hour zone. Obviously, there is a reason that we don't see more officers on the streets, and that needs to be fixed.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 272666 on June 6, 2008 at 9:40 a.m.

I never heard so much bull in my life as in these comments, you and I all know there is going to be a white wash and will be made to go away its called " executive privilege"
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 592398 on June 6, 2008 at 9:41 a.m.

Please wait for the investagation to be complete. No one knows what happened, maybe there was a slick spot on the highway, maybe something had spilled out of a tanker, who knows. If he did hit a slick spot and then lost control, the speed of his car could have increased at that point.

Obviously he has angered quite a few in this town.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712985 on June 6, 2008 at 9:45 a.m.

WHY DIDNT THEY STICK HIM WITH A NEEDLE AND DRAW BLOOD FROM HIM? THEY WOULD HAVE DONE THAT TO ANYONE ELSE.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711235 on June 6, 2008 at 9:48 a.m.

in response to 592398

when you hit a slick spot you don't speed up, you can't slow down, but you don't accelerate fast enought to move a large truck 50 yards.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712631 on June 6, 2008 at 9:51 a.m.

in response to 592398

i agree.. let's wait before we assume.
hope the txdot worker pulls through.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 425944 on June 6, 2008 at 9:52 a.m.

in response to 351711

How sad of you to spread gossip and rumors that are not true. Maybe you are Mr. Flores himself?

Sheriff Jim Kaelin is adamantly AGAINST drunk driving by ANYONE. He would never try to cover up anything.

He is just as concerned for the seriously injured Tx Dot worker as he is for Mr. Banales.

Nice try for you to try to discredit the Sheriff in all of this.

After all, .....it is an election year isn't it?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712985 on June 6, 2008 at 9:54 a.m.

in response to 592398

yea dude, what are you smokin' . if im going 30 mph and i hit a "slick spot", my car does NOT speed up. dont you know anything about physics?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 463263 on June 6, 2008 at 9:54 a.m.

This same stuff happens to all stories posted here by CCT... Everybody assumes something in some way or another about the story, but now it's the judge involved and it's all wrong?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 705049 on June 6, 2008 at 9:56 a.m.

I feel sorry for the worker. As far as any legal action against the judge, all the lawyers and judges in our legal systems are buddies. They act like they hate each other in court but they'll be sharing a pizza at lunch. Odds are the judge will get off easy.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 409842 on June 6, 2008 at 10:01 a.m.

prayers to the txdot worker
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712987 on June 6, 2008 at 10:02 a.m.

in response to 351711

I thought we could not spread lies on here? What you just did is just as bad as the National Inquirer.

Two people were involved in a horrible accident. None of us know the details.

The picture of the judge's car looked scary. I am surprised he survived. As for the TXdot worker, I am hoping he is able to come out of this and have a full recovery.

Does the TXdot worker have children? If so, can you imagine what they are going through? Not only that, what about his parents or other members of his family?

What about the judge? I know he has a family. They are probably worried about both parties. The pain to see a loved one lying in a hospital bed after something traumatic may go away but it will stay with you forever.

Have some sympathy for both worker and judge. Hope for the best out of both of them.

Caller Times, do you have any more details concerning this accident? Please hurry and update before this blog is filled with gossip and rumors.

My thoughts and prayers go out to both families as they go through this.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 409842 on June 6, 2008 at 10:02 a.m.

the judge was on a panel at the federal courthouse yesterday...the discussion was to start at 4 p.m...the accident happened at 3:20...wonder if he was rushing to the panel.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 425944 on June 6, 2008 at 10:06 a.m.

in response to 409842

If the accident happened at 3:20, and he didn't have to be at the Federal Courthouse till 4.....then that would have allowed him plenty of time. (there would have been no need to rush)
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712985 on June 6, 2008 at 10:07 a.m.

in response to 409842

yea it was 3:20, he had one hour to make it to the pow-wow.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 239123 on June 6, 2008 at 10:07 a.m.

post 329691 No it wasn't a closet thing. It was in the news. It happened maybe in the late 90s. I don't remember the name of the female. Maybe someone else remembers that accident.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 452408 on June 6, 2008 at 10:09 a.m.

First and foremost...I pray for both parties, family, and friends and for a speedy recovery for both men.

For all of you who think the book should be thrown at the Judge or that think he will get away with it just because of his standing in the community...I can almost guarantee that since the Judge probably has no prior record (he wouldn't be a Judge if he did), and if he is guilty of anything other than failure to control speed, then he will be granted probation. So all of hoping for prison keep dreaming. And that outcome would have nothing to do with his standing in the community. There was a lady on probation in San Patricio County (where I work) who has killed 3 people at two different times for drunk driving or driving under the influence of drugs and has been granted probation. Only after she tested positive for drugs was her probation revoked and sentenced to prison.

I hope none of you ever make a mistake this great. Because I don't want hear you ask "please don't send me to prison, it was the first time I ever screwed up". I hope the book gets thrown at you. It is unbelieveable how inconsiderate and rude people are. Next thing you know someone is going to assume the TxDot worker jumped in front of the Judge in order to be able to file a lawsuit.

Every single one of you on here crucifying the judge is nothing short of pathetic...and I don't even know the man.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 707647 on June 6, 2008 at 10:11 a.m.

Hope the TxDOT worker pulls thru. My prayers go out to them and their family.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 232885 on June 6, 2008 at 10:18 a.m.

Those fly-overs going both ways from SPID are accidents waiting to happen. There have been so many accidents on those exits that have resulted in serious life long injury.
You know maybe it was just an accident, maybe he was going a little fast, BUT how many of you can say that you haven't done the same thing at some point and time? I for one hope that all parties involved will pull through this.
Judge Banales is a good man and like other posters have said, he is a very good family man that believes in what he does as a judge. I am not a supporter of his wifes political position, but they are both decent folk.
Some of you people have such a blood lust and hope that the worst is true. You people frighten me more than any political officer ever could.
God Bless the Banales family and the family of the TxDOT worker
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 372756 on June 6, 2008 at 10:18 a.m.

I think the people on here writinng mean things about the judge are prolly people who have been sentenced by him or have family members who have been sentenced by him. Isn't everyone always complaining about how unfair the system is and how lax the judges are? Now you are slamming him for being too harsh? Is there no pleasing you people? Of course not, cause people love to have something to complain about. I agree with the bloggers who say maybe he did have problems breathing or was in the midst of a stroke. Also he is the one trying to keep our children safe so defintely kudos to him! As for the TXDOT worker, I sure do hope he gets better and my prayers are with him and his family.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712987 on June 6, 2008 at 10:19 a.m.

Some people get great satisfaction of bringing others down to their own levels.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711114 on June 6, 2008 at 10:31 a.m.

I do believe that newspapers generally have an obligation to investigate any elected official. This is particularly true when an elected Judge poses as being strict on law and order.
For example, was there any recent police report or incidents of this elected official? Or, was this official involved in any previous auto accidents in suspicious circumstances wherein someone was seriously hurt by this man?
I would very much appreciate any informative article dealing with these issues.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712710 on June 6, 2008 at 10:38 a.m.

My prayers go out to the city employee and Judge Banales. I hope everyone involved pulls through. What a terrible accident.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 376065 on June 6, 2008 at 10:40 a.m.

Is this the judge married to Peggy Banales?? The Peggy Banales with the magic funds transfer account??? Poor TXDoT worker. This will be one more coverup to help the priviledged politico class in Corpus Christi.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 235933 on June 6, 2008 at 10:51 a.m.

All you people who speed and disregard other's safty, let this be a lesson to you. Tailgating, speeding, weaving in and out of traffic just so you can get some place faster in 2 minutes just is simply not worth it.

SLOW DOWN!!!

Now the county gets ANOTHER tic on the tally sheet for a motor vehicle accident...
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 274667 on June 6, 2008 at 10:58 a.m.

He was probably mad that the money was going toward hiway maintenance rather than building him another $130,000 office!!!

I know that sounds horrible, but hey!!! He deserves it as far as the tax payers are concerned. What goes around comes around. Unfortunatly a low paid laborer had to pay the price once again.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712985 on June 6, 2008 at 10:58 a.m.

in response to 235933

we dont need to slow down, you need to move out of the fast lane, GET OUT OF THE WAY!!
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 274667 on June 6, 2008 at 11:08 a.m.

Let's be honost about all this.

Had the worker hit Banales as he was crossing the street at the court house, he would have been whisked off to jail immediatly. There would be NO investigation. The worker would have been brought up on charges, jailed, sentenced and hung within 48 hours. Not to mention the civil suits that would then hit him that would cost him his home, cars, job and future.

Just a thought...
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712985 on June 6, 2008 at 11:10 a.m.

two things dont make sense to me.
#1) THE CADILLAC SLID OFF THE PAVEMENT.
#2) THE TRUCK TRAVELED 50 YRDS.

1: when was the last time you saw a car just slide off pavement?
a) in the snow
b) in the rain
neither was the case in this situation.

2: do you know how far 50 yrds is???? that id half a football field!!
the truck probably weighs twice what the caddy does with all that equipment on it.

the judge was in WAY to big a hurry.
he should be punished.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 709587 on June 6, 2008 at 11:11 a.m.

My prayers go out to that young man and his family , also to the judge, you know, i hear many talk bad about judge banales, but you know what , hes not a bad person , he is looking out for our children , and if hes hard its cause hes protecting us,and he is fair. I believe that he doesnt mean any harm hes doing his job, and this is not about his work , its about the accident and prayfully everything will be ok, God Bless to you all and your familys.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 329691 on June 6, 2008 at 11:11 a.m.

in response to 239123

Ooookay, I get! Thanks for clearing that out. It's one of those social diseases and on the bench he looks like he couldn't hurt a fly and dangerous behind the wheel, too!! He needs to go to driving classes along with the other county employees.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 342632 on June 6, 2008 at 11:15 a.m.

i just hope that the police officials do their jobs the way they should and handle this situation the way it should be handled and not any differently because of one person being a judge.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 376065 on June 6, 2008 at 11:24 a.m.

in response to 709587

The judge may very well do his job great, but I am one voter who will not forget his wife and her "funny accounting methods" for funding an overpriced remodeling of his office. It is that sense of "entitlement" that makes me angry and should anger every tax paying citizen in Nueces County.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 373365 on June 6, 2008 at 11:24 a.m.

It seems like everyone is assuming alcohol or cell phone use is at fault. Everyone apparently understands these hazards, but I constantly am avoiding collisions from people I see are using their cell phone and driving, and can only guess at the alcohol use. If we know and understand these problems, why are they so common?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712993 on June 6, 2008 at 11:25 a.m.

This judge is something. He hits a worker that gets paid a fraction of what he himself makes and probably will forget about it in a few days. That's the way he appears to be, constantly sentencing people with little regards to the entire situation only to build a name for himself as the meanest judge in Corpus. Why? He deserves no leniency and should have a permanent mark on his record. I don't care how you look at it, he was at fault. There is know faulty roads or misunderstood signs that I have ever seen or heard of before. Let's see who plays the corpus christi people as fools and tries to make this seem like the judge is oh so innocent. I hope that you get the same attitude and judgment that you subject the people that make mistakes get, because yea your not God and some mistakes can be learned without the harsh punishment that you put forth on the people.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712992 on June 6, 2008 at 11:34 a.m.

Everyone's making this thing so big because of who is involved. Putting identities aside, let's not forget there is a person clinging to life through no fault of his own. And the second person who caused is in far better shape than the first.
I take that exit ramp daily, and I believe that to lose control in that area you must be going at an excessive speed or you are not capable of fully controlling your vehicle on curves. In either case, the driver is at fault for any loss of control.
The area did not receive any rain prior, so that can be ruled out. If perhaps there was a slick spot for whatever reason, the driver should be attentive and adjust accordingly. if the driver suffered some sort of episode suchas a heart attack, etc., should there not have been warning signs to cause him to pull over and call for help?
As I said I drive through there daily, and saw the accident shortly after it happened. My opinion is that the driver is at fault to some degree and if his inability to control his vehicle was caused by alcohol, or drugs, that that is just wrong.
He should be held accountable for his actions acording to the circumtances in which it all happened.
I hope the worker comes out okay. I hope the same for the driver as I believe he will be. In any case this will be something to carry on his conscience for the rest of his life.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 709587 on June 6, 2008 at 11:36 a.m.

in response to 376065

I understand your concern of his wife spending, but the whole issue is not his other half, its the accident that happened, and we just need to pray that everyone is gonna be ok, and pray for them and there families.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712993 on June 6, 2008 at 11:45 a.m.

IN response to 709587

Give me a break, he is not trying to protect our people. He is trying to protect a certain kind of people.. That money he spent on his over priced office came at some one losing there freedoms price. I wonder who he sentenced to get his hands on the money to make his office. He is not diplomatic by any means. He is however using his wrath of punishment to strike fear in your behind to be kissing up like that.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 376065 on June 6, 2008 at 11:57 a.m.

in response to 709587

I sincerely pray that everyone gets well and resumes their life as before; I just don't want to see this driver (Judge Banales) get any preferential treatment because of his community status. Like the paper said, the Judge is not hurt badly, so why did he lose control of that 6000 pound vehicle he drives and why was he is such a hurry? Failure to control speed, for sure.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 709952 on June 6, 2008 at 12:06 p.m.

Is this the same righteous judge (judge Bananas) that makes sex offenders put signs in their front yards? Wonder what they think right now. Did you see his car after the accident? I agree with post 712985, but since he's a judge I'm sure everything is in motion to get him off the hook. I'm sure there're a lot of people willing to do him a favor right now in case they end up in his court room.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711318 on June 6, 2008 at 12:12 p.m.

I'll probably be banned by the editor for this one, but here goes.....

The appearance of any special interest or privilege in this case is most important. From the first instant it was reported, this was not the case. Mysteriously, this website closed down comments on this article. Go ahead and write an explanation, but it's too late.Conclusion is that it was a petty attempt to abridge free speech.
The one local TV news channel that I watched last night, Channel 6, placed this story in third or fourth place, behind a home burglary, with skewed emphasis on the condition of the judge, including the skewed interview with the Sheriff. We could use some pointers from the Soviet's on this type of media manipulation, because these attempts yesterday were amatuer .
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 267132 on June 6, 2008 at 12:26 p.m.

Notice the headlines? The judge's CAR hit the transportation worker, not the Judge.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711114 on June 6, 2008 at 12:37 p.m.

I would believe that Channel 6 would put this story third or fourth. If an ordinary citizen is accused of a crime they will try to put inflammatory, untrue and prejudicial stories about them and do everything to prevent them from getting a fair trial. Channel 6 News is like fantasy and science fiction broadcast as truth.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 330770 on June 6, 2008 at 1:08 p.m.

Isn't this the guy who's wife, Peggy Banales, just voted her husband some $$$ so that he could get a new office off the taxpayer's back. What kind of integrity are you talking about? He gets a six figure salary as District Judge plus a salary for his 5th region duties, his wife gets a nice fat salary thanks to the raise she voted for herself and then they have the gall to take money from the poor people in Annaville and Calallen. Judge Banales is NOT a fair judge. Anyone who practices law in his Court knows that he is state oriented -- Judges should perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice. A judge who manifests bias on any basis in a proceeding impairs the fairness of the proceeding and brings the judiciary into disrepute. Banales has passed judgment in Court for 21 years. Not only people who are brought before his Court but also people who don't agree with him. People in Corpus do not speak their minds for some reason. They do not or can not say what they really mean. He has the power and he knows it and I think people are afraid of him.

We must hold these Judges to a higher standard for they are the ones that sit and Judge you and me for this same kind of incident. He would not hesitate for one second to put you behind bars if the shoe were on the other foot. Why are people making excuses for him. It was an accident only because Banales CHOSE to speed, talk on his cell phone or become distracted. He didn't have a heart attack, that is some excuse someone wants us to believe. He must accept responsiblity for HIS ACTION.

I too thought Sheriff Kaelin only talked and showed concern with Banales. He did not even mention the poor injured TxDot worker. I feel the preferential treatment already starting. Who gets a visit from the Sheriff when they're involved in an accident. Do you? Sounds like a cover up already starting.

My prayers go out to the worker and his family -- you know he's a goverment employee too.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 416377 on June 6, 2008 at 1:10 p.m.

how about mrs. peggy give all that extra taxpayer's money she has put aside to fix the judge's office and now help the victim and his family through this tough time. Makes sence.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 399225 on June 6, 2008 at 1:21 p.m.

Was Jim Kaelin driving the car or was he the guy that got hit? Why do we blame the Sheriff for every incident in this county? He was not involved. Get a life. Your candidate lost.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 338518 on June 6, 2008 at 1:46 p.m.

Judge Banales would be the first to expect that the appropriate procedures be followed in the investigation. He is strict but fair and seems to strive to do the RIGHT thing in everything he does. I have so much respect for this man. He has more integrity than any of you negative bloggers could ever have. I won't give the negativity any more attention. I'm sure that he and his family are devastated over this tragic event. I am so sad for the victim and his family and have them all in my prayers and I'm willing to bet, so does the Banales family.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 449075 on June 6, 2008 at 1:56 p.m.

Banales was drunk with power. Now let us see if the law works on people that do not control their vehicle.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 248197 on June 6, 2008 at 2:04 p.m.

Notice the headlines? The judge's CAR hit the transportation worker, not the Judge.
--
Stop trying to over analyze the headline. That's probably how I would title it too and I don't even care about the Judge.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 233198 on June 6, 2008 at 2:16 p.m.

OMG: The ignorance and small minds of some of you people...you have no idea what happened and are already throwing stones at the Judge...simply because he is a Judge....thugs....pfft.....get a life.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 329691 on June 6, 2008 at 2:29 p.m.

The injured worker must be in real bad shape since he will be transferred to San Antonio according to an update. Hopefully the judge will have the decency to inquire or visit this poor man. Yeah! there is alot of concern about the judge forget about the worker who's on lifesupport. Why do they have to mention the judge's car model? Cadillac Deville/Camry/Jeep who cares what he drove, his car did the injuries. He better prepare himself for a lawsuit. Could be in his own courtroom. And those of you who are so concerned about all these negative blogs, it's called Freedom of Speech. Don't login!!
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 236373 on June 6, 2008 at 2:34 p.m.

I heard he was on his wa y to Taqueria Garibaldi to catch the before dinner special.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 248197 on June 6, 2008 at 2:44 p.m.

They always mention the types of cars in incidents like these. Don't over analyze it.

And for goodness sakes, these are not blogs, these are just comments! A blog is different.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712998 on June 6, 2008 at 2:44 p.m.

My prayers go out to the TxDOT worker, Judge Banales, & both of their families.

Instead of thinking the worst possible outcomes, we should all pray for the best in both recoveries!

Also, we all should keep in mind accidents do happen, and knowing the Banales family, I know they all feel terrible for the accident that has occured. So out of respect, no one should express negative feelings towards the family during this time of suffering. Put yourself in his shoes, no way would this be an easy ordeal to cope with. Just think, if you were laying in a hospital bed with this accident weighing on your shoulders, you too would be looking for positive support!
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 233198 on June 6, 2008 at 2:45 p.m.

248197 haha you tell'em.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 444846 on June 6, 2008 at 2:58 p.m.

in response to 233198

Maybe, the judge was rushing home, after seeing you at your home. And thats why he was speeding. Maybe you need to get a grip.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 699733 on June 6, 2008 at 3:16 p.m.

in response to 712985

You are being very judgemental. Why don't you wait and see what the police find out in their investigation. After reading what might have happened, I think speed was the factor but we don't know for sure. Let us just wait and see and pray for both victims. I am sure the family of Judge Banales feel bad for the other victirm and his family. So, let us be nice about this and quit being so ugly about what might have happened. THIS IS WHY THEY ARE CALLED ACCIDENTS. Let us all pray that we are never in accidents.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711114 on June 6, 2008 at 3:39 p.m.

How many "accidents" is Judge Banales entitled to be involved in before he is held accountable for his actions? I believe this is the second serious very questionable "accident" wherein someone was seriously hurt.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 704748 on June 6, 2008 at 4:35 p.m.

hummm............how interesting. I just wonder, how is this going to get covered up???
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 703769 on June 6, 2008 at 4:59 p.m.

he's a judge, trust me he will get out of this with no pain ($)
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 319029 on June 6, 2008 at 5:22 p.m.

Judge Banales, You may not remember me and I sure didn't know you outside of your "State Judge" license plates that morning on Alameda and Doddridge when you almost ran me over.

Perhaps I can help you with your memory Judge Banales, I was starting to cross the street in the direction of Bank of America from Frost Bank when you made an illegal lane change from the through traffic lane to the turn lane, then ran the red light and almost hit me while I was in the crosswalk with a "WHITE CROSSWALK" light in my favor.

You may not remember with all of this information since you sped around the corner chatting with who I assume was your wife. When I got home I told my wife the whole story of the guy with a mustache and judges license plates that almost hit me.

I didn't know who you were until I saw your car on TV with the top cut open and you being carried away on a stretcher. If I were ever approached by law enforcement or an attorney I would be more than happy to relay my "experience" with your driving "under oath."

In my brief contact with you that Saturday morning, I don't think you belong behind the wheel of a car and definitely not in a position of authority in our community. Yet you are a judge! Outrageous!

I hope there is not another cover-up that is so common with investigations in Corpus Christi. My prayers are with that TEXDOT worker.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712731 on June 6, 2008 at 5:24 p.m.

I was on my balcony right in front of the freeway that the accident happened. The judge lost control from the lane going to Callalen. The truck was right in the middle of the 2 exits in the grass and as you all know that it is also an incline. He hit the truck and bounced away into the TXdot worker. To me it seemed like if he was driving faster than normal but I dont fully know what was happening on his end. I couldnt sleep last night after seeing that poor man get hit. My prayers go out to him and his family. The roof was only gone bc of the Jaws of Life. The whole driver side was smashed in the door almost literally fell off when they tried to open it. I think the judge was more concerned about that man bc they were talking to him than rushed to the TXdot worker. From there they attended to the worker first and almost 20 minutes later they took the judge out of his car into another stretcher.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711762 on June 6, 2008 at 5:30 p.m.

My daughter passed the same place about 10 minutes before the accident and said the wind almost blew her car off the road. So that may may have been a cause along with speed.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 233198 on June 6, 2008 at 6:56 p.m.

I am just curious.....had he NOT been a Judge would you that are hating be hating? Would the headline had been "Factory Worker or Nurse or Secretary hit City Worker." We do not know the whole story, stop creating it! Also if you think our city is so bad that there is going to be a cover up.....then why don't you move, stop making yourself miserable....Go live in another town.

Of course, I am sure the ones hating on him prolly are not on the right side of the law anyway, otherwise, why would they hate a Judge??

You guys are making yourselves look small and ignorant. You seem to forget, there is a man in the hospital and a family who is hurting too, maybe you should be sending him wishes instead of throwing up all these possible ways the accident happend that you know nothing about, why give him more hatred to read they are already in enough pain!

The lady on the Balcony: She saw the accident and did not even spew hatred, she came across very sympathedic and fair...try taking a cue from her!
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712918 on June 6, 2008 at 7:06 p.m.

I drive that overpass to Calallen every day and it is very tricky, especially on windy days. Most people do not observe the speed limit, those that do either get tailgated or passed up. I believe the wind could have been a factor.

Everyone should just stop with the public speculation of what happened and keep these gentlemen and their families in their prayers. Regardless of their profession, at this time they are two unfortunate human beings in need of everyone's prayers.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713008 on June 6, 2008 at 8:47 p.m.

in response to 389468

no
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713008 on June 6, 2008 at 8:51 p.m.

in response to 401467

he's a great judge
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713008 on June 6, 2008 at 9:01 p.m.

in response to 240803

i agree...everyone needs to pray for both parties. Leave these people alone...focus on healing, prayer and a happy ending ...lori
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713008 on June 6, 2008 at 9:08 p.m.

in response to 233106

yes there was a court manager under investigation but it wasn't judge banales court coordinater...and not in his court
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713008 on June 6, 2008 at 9:22 p.m.

in response to 449075

no he wasn't and you don't know my judge banales..stay focused on prayer and healing ...quick to judge...stay focused
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713008 on June 6, 2008 at 9:28 p.m.

in response to 712918

i agree...please pray for my judge and the other gentlemen in a positive recovery.....lori
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 237099 on June 6, 2008 at 9:40 p.m.

RE: 712918

He wasn't going towards Calallen - he was traveling on SH 358 and taking the ramp to go towards downtown. If the wind was a problem wouldn't there of been more cars being blown off the roadway-? WHY do you say everyone should STOP speculating on what happened when you yourself are doing the same.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712918 on June 6, 2008 at 10:22 p.m.

In response to 237099:

Read post 712731 (who witnessed the accident) and 711762. I'm not speculating why don't you try to read the posts again.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712664 on June 6, 2008 at 10:42 p.m.

in response to 274667

That argument doesn't bear any logic.....

keep the thought, raise you a clue.....

Prayers to the TXDot employee and his family.

Prayers to Judge Banales and his family.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 319029 on June 6, 2008 at 10:59 p.m.

If anyone thinks that I'm saying this because he's a judge, just remember one thing. I'm sure the banks where I was almost hit by this so-called judge have surveillance camera systems, as does the Exxon gas station on the other corner.

Some of you think judges and police chiefs should be held to the same standard as everyone else. Everyone "else" is not a judge or police chief. The low standards of Corpus Christi is what made it what it is today. It's not very pretty.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 254268 on June 7, 2008 at 2:12 a.m.

He killed someone like 20 years ago. How pompous can you be to keep killing people and still get reelected and twist arms to have your wife elected?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 710237 on June 7, 2008 at 4:42 a.m.

in response to 235519

Well, I think there is so much anomosity towards Judge Banales and of course his wife simply because how they attend to their work and positions. The issues about her moving county funds so her husband could redecorate his new office at City Hall, for him to encourage it, and for her to negotiate with the other commissioners behind the scenes when it came to the vote is the great distractor in all of this. This is what has turned many of the citizens off and this is why, unfortunately, people look upon the Judge and his wife with distrust and disgust. It did not bring out the best in us, I guess, and so people have made their feelings known which they have every right to do so.

Had the Judge and his Commissioner wife handled the above affair differently and not felt so entitled as most citizens felt, I think there would be more compassion towards him. But, it's too late for that. It isn't always the "right way" to go about something when we feel we can control everything and see that we aren't breaking a guideline as in the case of the Judge's office. The Judge and his wife got what they wanted but look at what cost it took on them. I bet they don't feel it was worth it now but this is a lesson to be learned by all public officials.

Yes, I agree, we need to nevertheless pray for everyone. My heart really goes out to Manuel Garcia, the worker, and his family. I am sure this is one of the most horrible events in their life. I am sorry they have to experience it. I am so sorry it had to happen...I am sure the Judge and his wife wished they could control something like this as well as they controlled redecorating the Judge's office.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 709654 on June 7, 2008 at 8:08 a.m.

Uh-oh.

Clear day.
No road hazards.
No inclement weather conditions.
We've all seen the posted signs concerning "workers ahead". Ramps, and their posted signs.

BIG trucks moved 50-yards by mid-sized cars. And not only moved, but pushed up an embankment at that. PUSHED UP. That children takes some hella pushin' by a much lighter object striking a much heavier stationary object. If you think not, try finding a person about 3 x's your body-weight and striking them with enough force to move them roughly 10 feet.

Some of you would do well to consult Newton's Laws as well as bone up on such things like Force, Resistance and other saiient matters

If it were me I'd better be hoping like HELL a stroke or heart attack was something it could be pinned on because anything otherwise I'd likely be going on vacation to Hotel Huntsville.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 699936 on June 7, 2008 at 10:24 p.m.

There is a fund for the txdot workers family to help with expenses while he is in the hospital. Navy Army credit union for txdot employee Martin Garcia. thank you and god bless everyone involved in this accident.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711760 on June 8, 2008 at 6:17 p.m.

Its sad how he will probably get away with this because of his position. And as far as everyone standing up for him and the sherriff that is just crazy. I chanllenge everyone and the MEDIA to look into a sherriff deputy with the last name of Solis getting terminated because of a vehicle accident. Why doesnt he get the same treatment. Lets see how far this gets and that will show how the system is when even media keeps quiet about some of this stuff.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 459106 on June 8, 2008 at 8:33 p.m.

Okay everyone, there are 3 possible reasons, 1. alcohol related, 2. using the cell phone and not paying attention or 3. Speeding, of which he is known to do quite often. He will not admit to speeding or using the cell phone, so people, don't expect a confession from him. There are ways to find out how fast he was going, or should I say estimate of speed, but what I heard, that is no longer revelent, that law suddenly changed the day of this accident. Mr. Banales, I have seen you at the church driving out of the parking lot like a bat out of hell quite a few times. Tell me Mr. Banales, if you did not have any alcohol in your system, good, but why would you run over this man? Were you going too fast to react and avoid him. Were you distracted by the cell phone, or were you just not paying attention? Will you admit to any of this? I think you should, because if not, that means you did it on purpose? I hope I am wrong, but it has to be one of these 3. You have gone through that route many times, you know that you have to slow down, why did'nt you? Being that you are a judge, you will get away with this, there is no doubt in my mind. I have seen it way too many times in my lifetime. You may be a law abiding citizen and a good judge, but you are human and can make mistakes just like everyone else. So be a man and tell the public the real truth, after all, is'nt that what you ask of the clients, be honest, truthful? Think about it everyone, there is no other explanation, if you have one, let all of us know. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against the judge, but he almost killed a man because of his negligence.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 243116 on June 8, 2008 at 10:14 p.m.

As all of you may understand, accidents are just that 'Accidents'. There is a lot of speculation as to the cause of the accident. Our main focus should be on the health and welfare of those involved. As a long-time friend of Martin, I hold no ill will towards the judge. Two families were affected. In retrospect, I just wished that there was just a little more coverage on Martin Garcia as there was on Judge Banales in the beginning. I just pray that everything comes out okay for all involved.
Additionally, I don't make it my business to solicit donations but there is a fund already established for Martin as posted earlier. For those who are not fully aware, there is a long and painful road to recovery that lies ahead for him and his family. For those who can, please take a moment to donate. Thank you in advance for your prayers and compassion.

Martin Garcia Fund
c/o Navy Army Federal Credit Union
P.O. Box 81349
Corpus Christi, TX 78468-1349

God Bless Martin and his family through this difficult time.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713037 on June 8, 2008 at 10:33 p.m.

Judge Banales gave me 60 years in prison for a crime....yes he is known to be a harsh man when it comes to the law. However, this same man after 6 years of recieving my letters and those of my wife, he reduced my sentence to 10 years. I am now with my family again. I wish for the best possible outcome for the victim and the Judge. Let us show a little compassion instead of finger pointing with upturned noses.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 415028 on June 9, 2008 at 9:06 a.m.

I can’t believe almost ALL the articles say ...the car slid off the pavement! WHAT? There was no ice? No rain? Yes, wind is horrible but…you have to speeding to cause any real damage like this. How come they are not speculating that? If it was some John Doe then they would have speculated speeding. Speed had to have played a factor and I wish the news would at least say that it might have been a factor. I really hope the investigation does not end at “the car slid” and crashed into a man and pushed a (super heavy) tractor. That would insult everyone’s intelligence. I have known the Garcia family for years and they are the sweetest family. My prayers are with them.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 709587 on June 10, 2008 at 10 a.m.

My prayers go out to both familys...Does anyone know how the young man is doing?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713086 on June 10, 2008 at 11:57 p.m.

My name is Josemanuel Edmundo Banales. I am the eldest son of Manuel and Peggy Banales. As a family, our thoughts and prayers are with the Garcia family and we wish Mr. Garcia a speedy recovery.

I've read the blogs and I would like to thank those of you who have prayed for my father, our family, and the Garcia family as well. We are grateful for your prayers and support.

My parents are political figures in the Corpus Christi community. I've witnessed and endured the attacks on them for 20+ years. Much of the speculation I've read is at best inaccurate and defamatory with out any basis of fact and under the veil of anonymity. I realize cannot keep any one of you from "exercising your first amendment right"; but what I can do is pray.

I will pray that you have the patience to let this investigation run its course. I will pray that you remember that Mr. Garcia and his family are suffering need our compassion. And I will pray that you will look to God and ask for peace. Many of you have never met my parents so I cannot comprehend how there could be so much hate towards them.

I pray that you realize whatever is in your hearts that causes you to direct your hate towards my parents is hurting us all. My ACTS brothers, my family and I have Mr. Garcia and his family, and the community of Corpus Christi in our prayers.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 711114 on June 12, 2008 at 9:19 a.m.

Seven calls for "prayer" are noted in Josemanuel's blog. Certainly one hopes these calls for prayer are heartfelt and not self serving hypocrycy in an effort to obscure the issues and defend his father.

However, instead of generalities by Josemanuel and repeated calls for prayer, specific denial about the allegations would greatly aid the community knowledge, including information about any prior specific automobile accidents.

I will reserve judgment of this case and all cases until he or his father responds to allegations of any other serious accidents and the facts and circumstances involving all of the accidents involving Judge Banales.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 712466 on June 12, 2008 at 9:55 a.m.

my prays to Mr. Garcia and the Judge
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713120 on June 12, 2008 at 12:58 p.m.

Serious action should be taken. It does not matter that he is a judge. HE is a cruel, mean, uncaring, person who doesn't care if he ruins people's lives. They should have given him a breathalizer among other things to determine the accident. A innocent man is now suffering for banales' carelessness and his entire family is suffering. Is it true that something to this nature happened in August of 1990 and nothing was done about it. Just like if it was a citizen who commited the crime actions would have been taken a long time ago, the person would have been arrested and could not refuse to give blood or take a breathalizer. This really pisses me off due to the fact my husband is serving a very harsh sentence that Banales sentenced him to with no feeling at all. He has a family out here a son who needs him. Did Banales care, no!!!!!!! So we should not feel sorry for him in no form or fashion, now he should be put in the same shoes, I damn sure dont care that he is a judge, the same laws should apply to him as well. Please pray for the Garcia family and by the way Banales should man up with hiss crooked a@* and publicly apologize to the Garcia family even though it will not make adifference in Mr. Garcia's physical health. I can't beleive it the heartless judge nearly took someone's life, I mean literally, he takes lives anyway by giving people hard unnecessary sentences for cases way smaller than the crime he has commited
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713163 on June 15, 2008 at 12:49 a.m.

in response to 713086

Jose Manuel,
I feel for your father and the TXDOT worker. I myself worked in a public position and found myself under fire for something I did not do. Like your father I know it hurts to be judged by others and presumed guilty just due to the fact public employees, judges, police etc are hated by so many people. At the same time I know that I will only go as far as God wants me and this case your father is now involved in will only go as far as God seems fit.
I think it is a great thing you did by standing by your father. I know that my son standing by me during these times I am going thru means the world to me. I will pray for your family and the hardened hearts of those who wish the worst for your father. God bless you all during these times. I have seen your father in court and always liked to listen to him. He is a very wise man and the public needs to understand we are only human. God bless Mr. Garcia and his family. as well. My heart goes out to them.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713155 on June 22, 2008 at 10:36 p.m.

Post 713163 - Why would I feel sorry for someone who caused an accident and is practically unhurt? Why would I feel sorry for someone who does not seem to be held accountable for his actions? You say you found yourself under fire for something you did not do. Are you saying Judge Banales did not hit him?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 713337 on June 24, 2008 at 12:41 a.m.

in response to 713086

Hi Jose Manuel Edmundo Banales,

I guess you don't really know your father otherwise you would know that he is intolerant of anyone who prays and takes religious activities seriously. You mention prayers but more than likely you use these vain and hypocritical words as a smokescreen to further your father's supposed political career. He considers people who go to church on a weekly basis to be religious zealots and ridicules them.

I hope the construction worker makes it okay but I hope justice is served for the actions your father committed...

Best Regards,
Jessie

Tuesday, April 01, 2008

LAW SCHOOL IN SOUTH TEXAS

LAW SCHOOL IN SOUTH TEXAS
Posted on March 29, 2008 at 07:22:15 PM by El Javelina

I am about to provide you information that is not well known to our current legislators. This information is hard won through tedious and meticulous research that would tire even a so called mega attorney. The information was gained through will and passion. It was gained because I really care about this issue and the future of the South Texas area.

1. Land, a worthy structure, and finances were once bequeathed (willed) by a King Ranch blood heir to the creation of a law school in Corpus Christi. This information can be discovered through a deed search at the Nueces County Clerk's Office. One can find this out using the various names of past deceased King Ranch family members.

2. The conveyance stipulated that the property be used to create a law school for the Texas A&M University System.

3. Texas Tech University School of Law was stopped from putting a satellite law school in South Texas because of political oppresors giving biased testimony at a State hearing concerning this issue.

4. Texas A&M Univeristy has had everything they needed to make this happen for years and sat on it.

5. Texas Tech University is currently willling to put a law school in Corpus Christi Texas as soon as possible, but is hindered by lack of coordination, political support, and interference from the University of Texas and the Texas A&M System.

6. Let it be known now, before anyone else can jump on the bandwagon and take credit to sustain ill-guided egotistical aspirations, that a law school is within reach. All that is needed now is cooperation.

The old Court House building is not a viable spot according to reports. That whole campain to put a law school there was not realistic. However, the King Ranch grant is a substantially more effective solutions.

Details and specifics coming later. You heard it here first.

Thursday, January 03, 2008

Those who pretend they know my writing are so stupid they prove it...in writing!

Caller.com Corpus Christi News and Information

* Home
o ASK THE PROS
o OBITS
o COASTALBEND.COM
o MILITARY
o BLOGS
o FORUMS
o HEALTH
o PRINT ADS
* News
o ARCHIVES
o COLUMNISTS
o LOCAL
o STATE
o NATIONAL
o OBITS - News
o OBITS - Paid
o PHOTOS
* Business
o LOCAL
o US/WORLD
o COLUMNISTS
o MARKETWATCH
o TECHNOLOGY
* Sports
o LOCAL SPORTS
o HIGH SCHOOL
o CALLER OVERTIME
o COLLEGE
o PRO
o OUTDOORS
* Entertainment
o ARTS
o COMICS
o EVENTS
o MOVIES & SHOWTIMES
o MUSIC
o GAMING
o RESTAURANTS
o TV LISTINGS
* Lifestyles
o BOOKS
o FASHION
o HEALTHY LIVING
o HOME & GARDEN
o HOROSCOPES
* Community
o EDUCATION
o SCHOOLS
o SCHOOL SEARCH
o NEIGHBORHOOD NAVIGATOR
o EVENTS
o OUR MILITARY
o RELIGION
o SOCIETY
o BIRTHS
o WEDDINGS
* Opinions
o COLUMNISTS
o EDITORIALS
o LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
o WRITE A LETTER
o BLOGS
* Weather
o 7-DAY FORECAST
o COASTAL WATERS FORECAST
o EMAIL ALERTS
o HURRICANE CENTER
o WEATHER RADIO
* Caller.com Corpus Christi Jobs
* Homes
o Sales
o Rentals
o Open Homes
o Sunday Homes
* Cars
o Used Cars
o New Cars
o Find a Dealer
o Research
* Classifieds
o Place an Ad
o Find Ads
* ASK PRO
o Ask the Professionals your question
* Help

search

Web Search powered
by YAHOO! SEARCH

Upload your family recipes

Make your family recipes famous by sending them to Caller.com. We'll post them online for your enjoyment!

Click to submit your recipe
Dillards
News

* Local
* Hot Topics
* Columnists
o Mike Baird
* State
* Mexico
* National
o Severe Weather
o Science
o Health
o Politics
o News of the Weird
o Today in History
* World
* Noticias Generales
o Financieeras
o Entretenimientos
o Deportivas
* Caller Multimedia
o Photo Galleries
o Podcasts
o Videos
o Crime Stoppers
* News Obits
* Paid Obits
* National Obits
* Police Scanner
* Road Work
* Archives

TopJobs
MORE

* DRIVERS -EXP'D and INEXP'D
* FRONT DESK PERSONNEL
* Case Manager
* CNA's, LICENSED VOCATIONAL NURSE
* CASE MANAGER
* ASSEMBLY, RECEPTIONIST
* gas pipeline construction forman

Click a job to view details
Breaking News Alerts

dannoynted1, Get the Caller.com E-mail News and Weather alerts
SIGN UP NOW!
My Caller

You are logged in as:
L. Haley (Logout)
Local
Girls taking over
Sisters, 11 and 9, design, sell own line of clothing
Duane Hanson (background) often takes calls and orders merchandise for his daughters, Heather, 9, (left) and Hailey, 11, who have started their own apparel business called Girls Taking Over.
Photo by Todd Yates
Duane Hanson (background) often takes calls and orders merchandise for his daughters, Heather, 9, (left) and Hailey, 11, who have started their own apparel business called Girls Taking Over.
Heather Hanson, 9, holds up a business card for Girls Taking Over, the clothing line she and her sister, Hailey, 11, started. They recently expanded their business with the help of a $2,000 bank loan.
Photo by Todd Yates
Heather Hanson, 9, holds up a business card for Girls Taking Over, the clothing line she and her sister, Hailey, 11, started. They recently expanded their business with the help of a $2,000 bank loan.
Todd Yates/Caller-Times Hailey Hanson, 11, and her sister, Heather, 9, show off some of their designs for their clothing line Girls Taking Over. The business started in the late summer and most of their T-shirts were sold at surfing competitions.
Todd Yates/Caller-Times Hailey Hanson, 11, and her sister, Heather, 9, show off some of their designs for their clothing line Girls Taking Over. The business started in the late summer and most of their T-shirts were sold at surfing competitions.

STORY TOOLS

* E-mail story
* Comments
* iPod friendly
* Printer friendly
* Print with Comments

related linksMore Local News

* Office seekers look to the fall
* Signs help honor accident victims
* Freezing weather returns

related linksSHARE THIS STORY
Newsvine Del.icio.us Digg Fark Yahoo! Reddit

CORPUS CHRISTI — When they aren't out riding the waves, Hailey and Heather Hanson are imagining them.

Their father, Duane, knows its time for business when he sees the two sisters with colored pencils and a notebook.

Together the two girls have masterminded a new company, established a business plan, taken out a $2,000 bank loan with the help of their father, and met with a financial consultant to help them secure funds for college -- all this at ages 11 and 9.

"We went into the Wind and Wave Surf Shop and saw some clothes that were cool, but were too big," said Hailey, 11. "The guy who works there said we should come up with our own clothing line for young girls and we took him seriously."

Within a few weeks, Hailey and Heather had come up with some initial designs and colors they wanted on their shirts. They also came up with a company name -- Girls Taking Over, or GTO.

"We picked that name because at surfing competitions the guys are the ones who get the money prizes and all of the attention," Heather, 9, said with a smile. "But there are a lot of surfer girls out there, too, and we are going to take over."

The two girls have been surfing with their father since they were 2 years old. They have competed in numerous competitions and their office in their Padre Island home is decorated with their trophies and awards.

Although Hailey and Heather don't always agree as sisters, as business partners the two have a knack for putting things aside and making the best business decision, their father says.

"Sometimes one of them wants one color or one design and the other one wants something else, but they have been able to compromise," said Duane, a pharmaceutical sales representative.

The business started in the late summer and most of their T-shirts were sold at surfing competitions. In November the girls decided the business had to expand, but to do that they needed more money. Duane took them to see John Trice president of the island's Frost Bank.

"They were so cute and so smart," Trice said. "They knew they needed $2,000 to buy additional T-shirts and beanie hats and they asked me to teach them how to write deposit slips and checks."

Once the money was secured, the girls contacted an online store with wholesale T-shirt, sweater and beanie hat products.

They stay up late (10 p.m.) on the weekends working on their latest designs and have established a Web site at www.girlstakingover.net. Although the Web site is not finished, the girls have added their father's cell phone number so he can help coordinate orders with potential customers.

Duane spends most of his evenings taking calls for Girls Taking Over and ordering additional merchandise.

"The girls are in fifth and fourth grades, surf, participate in Taekwondo, work on the clothes designs so they are busy campers," he said. "But they love doing it all."

Prices for their merchandise range from $15 to $25.

How to order

Girls Taking Over surfer clothes for young girls and babies.

Contact: Duane Hanson

gtopops@yahoo.com

947-9871

www.girlstakingover.net

Contact Elvia Aguilar at 886-3678 or aguilare@caller.com

View latest stories with comments »
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: We've changed the way comments appear on the site. Click here for more information.

* 1. Keep it clean.Comments that are obscene, vulgar, lewd or sexually-oriented will get the ax. Creative spelling of such terms also will be banned.
* 2. Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
* 3. Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything.
* 4. Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
* 6. Keep it local. Do not post direct links to sites outside of Caller.com.
* 7. Police yourselves. Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
* 8. Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
* 9. Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
* 10. Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
* 11.Help us get it right. If you find a factual error or misspelling, email newmedia@caller.com or metrodesk@caller.com, or call 886-3697.

Your Comment Display Options:
Show Flagged Comments Hide Flagged Comments
+ Increase Font Size - Decrease Font Size
Post Your Comments

Post 1 January 2, 2008 at 6:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I hope the best for these girls however I also hope they meet a guy named Dave Ramsey to make sure they start off right. He would have been proud of everything but the loan. Good luck girls!

Post 2 January 2, 2008 at 7:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I hope you all the best in your new business . It is great to see kids that have a goal like this at such a young age . good luck ... A nd I love the name , GTO

Post 3 January 2, 2008 at 8:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Here's hoping the best for them also but Dave Ramsey teaches home finances, not business. They should read anything by Robert Allen and Robert Kiyosaki.

Post 4 January 2, 2008 at 8:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)

They should only listen to their father and not the radio talk show gurus and writers of books.

Post 5 January 2, 2008 at 8:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)

hmmm, GTO. The kids may have to come up with some different branding as Pontiac may not let them get away with that.

Good Luck

Post 6 January 2, 2008 at 8:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I wish them all the best, they seem driven toward their goal. On the flip side of that coin, I hope they don't lose interest in it as it being a passing fantasy.

Post 7 January 2, 2008 at 8:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree with Post 2. Dave Ramsey, albeit intelligent, targets his show and books towards people who do not know how to handle their money. Many businesses need to have loans in order to become established, and Dave knows that - stocks and bonds are borrowed money, stocks not being guaranteed to yield a return. There's nothing wrong with borrowing money if you're responsible enough to pay it back on time, or even better: pay it back well before it's due. Of course, your average Dave Ramsey caller seeking advice doesn't understand that and they borrow well beyond their means. I personally use Dave Ramsey's overall message for my personal financial goals for the most part, but I also see it as being extreme which is necessary for people who cannot think for themselves.

Good luck to these young entrepreneurs. Starting entrepreneurial ventures at a young age should certainly pay off. Selling popcorn as a cub scout, helping with school fundraisers, and starting work at the age of 16 certainly did well for me, and so I have no doubts that these girls will do great in their future endeavors .

Post 8 January 2, 2008 at 10:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)

25 people injured and one killed on a bus South of Victoria this morning, and this is the only newspaper not reporting it within 250 miles of here..lol

Post 9 January 2, 2008 at 10:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

as they get older, will their designs age with them?

Post 10 January 2, 2008 at 10:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)

i'm starting a shirt company called "men will always be #1"

Post 11 January 2, 2008 at 11:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Yes Post 2 and 6, Dave Ramsey is awesome. I would advise the dad and mom to read his book. And when the girls are older they should also read his books and take his course. I have heard awesome things about Financial Peace University.

Post 12 January 2, 2008 at 2:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post 3, Yes, their father is their ultimate adviser but it would be wise for him to become a voracious reader. You can learn something from these "writers of books."

I agree with the Kiyosaki recommendation. "Rich Dad, Poor Dad" would be a great place to start. Also, Texas A&M CC has resources available to help new businesses.

Post 10, Dave Ramsey is totally inappropriate for business.

Post 13 January 2, 2008 at 2:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

#8...
Seriously? You want us to predict the future? Who knows the answer to that question. Not even the girls know!

Post 14 January 2, 2008 at 3:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Dave Ramsey makes money selling books. These girls with their father' help are selling clothes. Their father doesnt need to read anything. He's doing that's better than reading how to.

Post 15 January 2, 2008 at 3:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Some people seem to be promoting Dave Ramsey. These girls and their father have already consulted a financial advisor according to the article, what they need more reading material?

Post 16 January 2, 2008 at 3:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Are these two young girls the Mary Kate and Ashley of Corpus Christi, Texas?

Post 17 January 2, 2008 at 3:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

There's so much negativity! Good luck to these girls.

Post 18 January 2, 2008 at 4:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)

way to go girls.......wish you the BEST

Post 19 January 2, 2008 at 4:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)

What about girl designs for skateboards? - just an idea.

Post 20 January 2, 2008 at 4:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Good luck girls!! I hope it all works out for you both.

Post 21 January 2, 2008 at 5:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I am originally from Corpus Christi, & have since moved to Austin, Tx. I am proud to know that these girls are from Corpus as well , & plan to enrich their lives by starting their own business venture & go to work for themselves. Go Girl Power, you young ladies rock! Good luck & God Bless.....

Post 22 January 2, 2008 at 6:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)

**
Do you people really buy into this garbage?

If this were really the case, we would see kids their age come up with this stuff all the time. Daddy's got a good scam going & we're so hung up on Feel-Good news many suck it up!
I personally have not seen any kids in the Barrios of Corpus Christi coming up with this stuff. So, Thank You Daddy :)

SIDEBAR: I've noticed One or Two of you would call a Train Wreak something good! Do you really think anyone really buys you Syrupy attempt to Candy-Coat the news everyday. You praise the Cops, the Counsel and the City on everything happening around here. Your idea of hiding your head in the sand and everything bad will go away so simplamatic.
Instead of let's all say nice things and everyone will think C.C. is Hunky Dory.
Why not face the fact! We need a lot of Improvement around here ! Many have serious questions about our Police, Our Town and how we are planning to fix this mess ! Many Town people will not listen to others who have lived in other places and have been though these issues before.
We have to Clean up our act around here, the world is passing us by.

Post 23 January 2, 2008 at 6:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post 20: Don't be hating :) just because you didn't come up with this great idea.

Post 24 January 2, 2008 at 8:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Hiding your head in the sand is hardly a new idea.

If you seriously think this was those kids Idea, then you've been smoking crack!!

Post 25 January 2, 2008 at 8:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Well, good luck to them...I checked out their web page...not completed yet...and the spelling and grammar was pretty horrible. Well, if you want to dance with the big dogs, you should go by the rules and at least know the business basics... getting a loan is not everything........Maybe some adult can teach the business owners how to spell...That's why I deal with the American Bank.......

Post 26 January 2, 2008 at 11:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post 20,

Behave Anton Haley & Leeann Haley, alias Jaime Kenedeno & Dannyonted.

Why do you use the name Jaime Kenedeno when your infact an anglo?

Stop the jealousy

Post 27 January 2, 2008 at 11:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

**
RE: Post 24

You gotta be on crack too!

No where in post #20 were the names "Anton Haley & Leeann Haley, alias Jaime Kenedeno & Dannyonted" mentioned.

In regards to anyone being Anglo. Why are you attempting to make the story about race. In addition, you asked the rest of us not to be Jealous..... again. I think you got a batch. Consider therapy !!

Post 28 January 3, 2008 at 12:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Post 25,

didn't i tell you two to behave already. Your temper and vulgar language is known by everyone already. It doesn't take a genious to figure out that your behind the mud talking.

Post 29 January 3, 2008 at 7:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Tiger Wood's daddy helped him out. Selena's daddy helped her out, the Tennis champs, Serena and ? their daddy helped them out, three examples only should help out the dimwitted that make up the bulk of Corpus Christians.

So, big time daddies, did you buy your kiddo a Dallas T-shirt so he can be like poppy?

Post 30 January 3, 2008 at 8:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Congratulations to DAD! He is trying to expand the girl's minds into business, selling something that is good seller at all times. T-Shirts, everyone wears them. If it doesn't work, so what? It was his money! Other kids just say "gimme,gimme" Good luck on this "growing company" & may you be blessed with your "growing horizon" to have a "growing business"-

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, contain links to sites other than Caller.com, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, August 05, 2007

Corpus Christi Caller Times: After we finish with (this issue), Mr Mike Hummel will always remember to read the local internet and to give credit wher

Corpus Christi Caller Times: After we finish with (this issue), Mr Mike Hummel will always remember to read the local internet and to give credit where credit is due.



This morning I got a call that took me out on the streets. I needed a little punch so I put it on a Classic Rock Station expecting maybe some Hair of the Dog or War Pigs or maybe even Lovin You Sunday Morning or Proud Mary but it wasn't to be. I hear the end of a discussion with our Corpus Christi City Council Member stuck smack dab in the middle of that damn river.

WATT River?...........

Some begin to ponder, while there are others who know exactly where I am going with this River issue; after we finish with (this issue), Mr Mike Hummel will always remember to read the local internet and to give credit where credit is due.



You know with the Memorial Coliseum I have not the sentimentality or passion like many of you guys possess and concurrently I dont believe it needs to be torn down. I was against anything that TRT wanted to bring to this town in light of what they left us upon departure.



Some events and it might even be many events; cannot afford to use ABC Center; so it is not really a public arena like the Memorial Coliseum operated. Heck, many of us cannot afford to attend an event that is held in the ABC Center. So, tell us Mr. Hummel, Mr Burns and Mr Solis, will you make it affordable at least for our Local Goodwill Organizations like the Shriners to hold an event?




Currently, the ABC Center is out of our Local Goodwill Organizations reach because of price?


Now the Point at hand,

The discussion was about the Memorial Coliseum and specifically about the hiring of a consultant and if the City of Corpus Christi is going to follow WATT ever the Consultant recommended.

Corpus Christi City Councilman Hummel answered that the people have been included in the rounds of community input and public meetings.

The host asked if the Corpus Christi City Council was going to ask the consultant to include the input or if it will factor in.


Corpus Christi City Councilman Hummel quickly affirmed that the community's input has already been included.

The host then connected like Barry Bonds, Hank Aaron and the Great Bambino Himself; he asked Hummel if the Corpus Christi City Council is considering the input from all of the people at the Caller Times on the Coliseum issue?

Mike Hummel answers "I don't know anything about whats going on at the Caller Times".

The host says you dont know, you haven't read the article at the Caller Times about the Memorial Coliseum and the internet input and suggestions from the public, you arent going to consider that input?

Hummel studdered 3 or 4 times and then a couple more times and then he said we got, we got people, we got other people on that, I think, I'm not a computer guy , but I think they are calling them something like blogs, Im not a computer guy, or something like that. Then continued the D NILE of the POWER OF THE INTERNET and the reality that the People are beginning to Engage themselves in the Formulation of Public Policy. Since you cant hear us Mr Hummel, let me yell a little louder and maybe everyone else will as well.

Mr Hummel, that River's name; we call it D Nile, get out of it. In fact a big part of your electability came from the web community. Power of the Pen Mr Hummel. When coupled with facts only an idiot would be so ignorant to be unaware of what some people are calling blogs. The credibility (or not) is right there in black and white for everyone to read. Do you still want to claim that you havent tread the input at the Caller Times Community Input Forum? Although censored slightly it can give there are many souls participating. They are already pissed off and to think that our City Council is trying to act like they are unaware of our presence. That is unbelievable Mr Hummel.

Nothing Personal MR Hummel, but I do believe you have a little bit of homework to do.

"Engaging the average citizen in the formulation of Public Policy" is our mission @ Kenedeno & Associates. "The Net is a powerful force for change -- and a dynamic tool for citizen education and action. Read the latest research on citizen participation (ENGAGEMENT) online, the stories and experiences of coalitions, corporate clients, and others working in the cyber trenches, and discover the potential to become an active participant in online democracy.

Friday, August 03, 2007

Corpus Christi Caller Times: Corpus Christi Daily Digital: Linda was the first person in a Corpus Christi Public Housing Dev. to successfully run 4 pu

Corpus Christi Caller Times: Corpus Christi Daily Digital: Linda was the first person in a Corpus Christi Public Housing Dev. to successfully run 4 pub office: a person who picked

Corpus Christi Daily Digital: Linda was the first person in a Corpus Christi Public Housing Dev. to successfully run 4 pub office: a person who picked herself up by her bootstraps

by hkarsh

August 2, 2007

I was a candidate for the Del Mar Board of Regents. I picked up the package to run for office. I am College Educated. I have several degrees. I'm pretty good at reading and writing contracts and such. I'm not a lawyer and believe me I could have used a lawyer to explain all the stuff I was responsible for and had to do. Del Mar wasn't going to explain it to me and the local party bosses wouldn’t have anything to do with me. Del Mar certainly wasn't going to help Linda whose brother they had railroaded out of a job. Now Linda was the first person in a Corpus Christi Public Housing development to successfully run for a public office and her neighbors were very proud of her. So here we have a person who picked herself up by her bootstraps with out the aid of the local democratic or republican bosses and won her election. So what do the local politicos do and that includes our slimy DA


there's more at the link above

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

Hector P Garcia Institute of Education, Integrity, Culture and Public Policy: Corpus Christi Watchdog Authority: Fwd: [Bay of Pigs] Judge Westergren h

Friday, June 08, 2007

Google Yourself Corpus Christi: When Carlos Valdez Confesses Error Does Not The Same Rule Apply?

Google Yourself Corpus Christi: When Carlos Valdez Confesses Error Does Not The Same Rule Apply?


First, in seeking the death penalty, prosecutors sometimes overlook glaring illegalities.

"courts, especially state courts, are too often willing to overlook even obvious constitutional flaws when reviewing death penalty cases."


And if they are "willing to overlook even obvious constitutional flaws and glaring illegalities when Prosecuting & reviewing death penalty cases."

WATT about all of the other cases?

How many "overlooks" of
"constitutional flaws" or "glaring illegalities" have become tools of Cheating Prosecutors who have forgotten "Prosecutors, despite striking hard blows, must never lose sight of their ultimate obligation to do justice in every case.

How many Prosecutors deliberately commit the error of failing to file a reply brief in an Appeal Process because it deprives the appellant of exculpatory testimony, evidence, and confessions of error or witness tampering by the State Prosecuting Attorney?



----
CONFESSING ERROR
By EDWARD LAZARUS
----
Friday, Jun. 16, 2000

Earlier this month, Vincent Saldano, one of the 468 inmates on Texas' death row, had his death sentence vacated. This development was duly reported in the press. But accounts of Saldano's good fortune uniformly failed to appreciate what makes his reprieve truly newsworthy and potentially a landmark.

Saving Saldano: Texas Confesses Error



[Illustration]

Saldano was not freed from the prospect of execution by the actions of a court or even, as occasionally happens, by the clemency of a governor. His death sentence was erased because Texas, through its newly created office of the solicitor general, "confessed error" in his case -- that is, it admitted, despite defeating Saldano's initial appeals in court, that his death sentence was illegally obtained. Quite simply, this never happens, either in Texas or in the dozens of other states with active death penalty laws. It is thus worth pausing to consider the value and potential implications of Saldano's case as well as the notion of confessing error.

Saldano had received a death sentence in part due to profoundly troubling testimony by a state expert witness at the sentencing phase of his trial. The expert, a clinical psychologist named Walter Quijano, suggested that Saldano should be executed because, as an Hispanic, he posed a special risk of future dangerousness to society. To support this astonishing conclusion, the expert pointed out that Hispanics make up a disproportionately large amount of Texas' prison population.

It does not take a tenured professor of constitutional law to realize that linking racial identity with a propensity for violence was not only bizarre but also a violation of the equal protection clause. Indeed, that it should take a confession of error by the state to correct this problem highlights at least two problems in the current administration of the death penalty. First, in seeking the death penalty, prosecutors sometimes overlook glaring illegalities. The same flaw identified in Saldano's case infects at least seven other Texas capital cases. Second (and perhaps even more distressing), courts, especially state courts, are too often willing to overlook even obvious constitutional flaws when reviewing death penalty cases. After all, before the state's confession of error, Saldano had lost all of his appeals.

Under these circumstances, one might think that confessions of error would be, if not commonplace, at least occasional. On average, the Solicitor General of the United States confesses error in two or three criminal cases every year -- even though it is a safe bet that federal prosecutions, conducted by better trained lawyers with greater supervision, are less likely to contain obvious legal errors than their state counterparts. As the Supreme Court recognized when endorsing the practice in 1942, "the public trust reposed in the law enforcement officers of the Government requires that they be quick to confess error, when, in their opinion, a miscarriage of justice may result from their remaining silent." But as a practical matter, states never confess error in death penalty cases (even though courts overturn roughly two-thirds of all death sentences as legally infirm) -- and some states candidly admit that their policy is never to confess error.

Mutual Distrust

Why? One crucial and usually overlooked factor is the deep antagonism that has grown up over time between state death penalty prosecutors and the death penalty abolitionist lawyers who seek to foil them in every case. The abolitionists, prosecutors know all too well, never concede that their clients deserve the death penalty or that the death penalty was legally imposed -- no matter how flimsy their arguments in a given case. Rather, they use every procedural and substantive trick in the book to delay executions.

There can be no denying that such abolitionist tactics have angered and frustrated state prosecutors. And one response to these understandable emotions has been for prosecutors to mirror the fight-to-the-bitter-end approach of their opponents.

The problem with this reciprocation, however, is simply that the ethical duties of prosecutors and defense attorneys are vastly different. Defense attorneys are duty-bound to scratch and claw to win for their clients. Prosecutors, by contrast, despite striking hard blows, must never lose sight of their ultimate obligation to do justice in every case.


That may sound trite and perhaps overly idealistic, but it has a practical side as well. Prosecutorial confessions of error -- knowing when to fold them, as it is known -- establish credibility. They create trust in the system, a sense that someone is being careful and exercising sound judgment, that extends far beyond any single case. And that can make a world of difference for someone like me, who is not morally opposed to the death penalty but skeptical of how it is imposed.

Death Penalty Politics

In addition, the reluctance of state prosecutors to confess error is a clear reflection of how politics affects the death penalty. Up until now, anyway, undoing a death sentence was akin to political suicide for an elected district attorney or state attorney general, or for any state official with ambitions for re-election or higher office. And yet the willingness of Texas' new solicitor general to confess error in the Saldano case suggests a possible turning point. With the current groundswell of death penalty opposition based on the possibility of executing an innocent person, elected officials may now find some advantage in approaching capital cases (even those where innocence is not an issue) with a greater degree of care and honesty.

case will start a broad trend. But there is reason to believe that the tide is indeed turning. On June 9, Texas Attorney General John Cornyn announced the results of an investigation into other death penalty cases involving testimony by state expert Walter Quijano. Cornyn acknowledged that Dr. Quijano had provided testimony in six other death penalty cases similar to his improper testimony in the Saldano case. Cornyn's staff has advised defense lawyers for the six inmates now on death row that his office will not oppose efforts to overturn their sentences based on Quijano's testimony. In response, a pessimist might note that Texas is appealing a ruling in another capital case that the defendant received inadequate counsel -- when, indisputably, his lawyer slept through much of the trial. But doing the right thing has a contagious quality to it. Or at least so we can hope.


Edward Lazarus, a former federal prosecutor, is the legal correspondent for Talk Magazine and the author of Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court.

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Parkdale Bank: According to Gambi Gamboa, "John Longoria, Carol Scott and Dwayne Hargis already have chosen and will officially choose Roland Barrera

Parkdale Bank: According to Gambi Gamboa, "John Longoria, Carol Scott and Dwayne Hargis already have chosen and will officially choose Roland Barrera as soon as Fri



After analyzing the recent events surrounding the resignation of CCISD Board Trustee Harry Williams (1 of 3 at large district positions); one thing IS clear. That one thing is Due Process (or lack of it). Immediately one's memory of search firm fiascos and the CCISD Board tool of choice, the Interim Superintendent buffer / scapegoat. The process was elaborate and ethical reasons or rule were claimed as the reason for the process.

Well, why such a rush fellas?

Why is the CCISD board in such a hurry to fill this position?

A Superintendent position and a Trustee position; one we wine, dine and lodge and the other we announce for applications for a month or so and "narrow the list down" from 20 to 5 in most expedient fashion. Now, making a long story short we have 20 candidates who invested their creative, intellectual and professional abilities into a work product they hope will be scrutinized by the Board and be successfully competitive. A good letter of interest comes only from the heart. The application is at times tedious but at least it is more objective than the TAKS. Updating one's resume and with a list of references most meaningful to the position and all of this for 15 to get thrown in the trash can and the 5 resumes remaining are to place on public display

full story here

"I'll be as hardy of mind as I am of body. I'll be a straight-shooter and a square-dealer. My family name will be sacred My word will be as good as any contract. I'll remember the Alamo. I'll stick by my friends. And I'll eat more chicken-fried steak."

Monday, May 07, 2007

"IN THE KNOW": Carlos Truan | Hugo Berlanga & The Primrose Path & Rangel Law School @ Texas A&I University.

"IN THE KNOW": Carlos Truan | Hugo Berlanga & The Primrose Path & Rangel Law School @ Texas A&I University.

Subject: ["IN THE KNOW"] Carlos Truan | Hugo Berlanga & The Primrose Path & Rangel Law...
To:
kenedenonews@gmail.com

[ http://storkclub-winchell.blogspot.com/2007/05/irma-rangel-legacy-relating-to.html]
http://www.ibcmemorial.org/irma.html

Monday, May 7, 2007
Carlos Truan | Hugo Berlanga | Henry Cuellar | Edwards, Al | Todd Hunter | Luci0 : The Primrose Path & Rangel Law School @ Texas A&I University.

Or posture for another agenda?



Who at that time wanted a Pharmacy College?



Celanese, King Ranch, URI?



Now we have this unorthodox legislation for an Engineering School @ TAMUCC?








This is a Developing Medical Community with the ability to become the finest in the world. Medical Nanotechnology is already here, $ are already here.

The Political Faction at TAMUCC will find their equilibrium eventually. An engineering school @ CCSU / TAMUCC is obtuse to the medical assets we have accumulated and the Philanthropy already well rooted in South Texas.


Irma Rangel Legislation was for the establishment of a law school at Texas A & I




The Age of Winchell: Irma Rangel Legacy : Relating to the establishment of a law school at Texas A&I University.



Hugo Berlanga | Henry Cuellar | Edwards, Al | Todd Hunter | Eddie Lucio


Bill: SB 646
Legislative Session: 71(R) Council Document: 71R 1835 MHT-D
Add to Bill List
Last Action:02/28/1989 S Reported favorably w/o amendments

Caption Version:Introduced
Caption Text:Relating to the establishment of a law school at Texas A&I University.

Author:Truan

Subjects:Education--Higher-- General (I0231)
TEXAS A&I UNIVERSITY (U2467)

Companion:HB 1630 by Rangel, Identical

Senate Committee: Education
Status:Out of committee
Vote:Ayes=9 Nays=1 Present Not Voting=0 Absent=1




--
Posted By The Advocate to Google Yourself Corpus Christi at 5/07/2007 02:46:00 AM

Friday, April 20, 2007

"IN THE KNOW": Remember The Crime Stoppers "Vandalism" of the Corpus Christi Country Club Golf Coursehigh powered members who control our nation’s eco

Friday, January 19, 2007

Overlawyered: Can you guys hear me now?

Monday, December 18, 2006

The Average Citizen does not know about the destroyed County References for Agenda items (Context)

When a few abuse their offices ... citizens justifiably wonder then who can they trust in the rest of government, ? Dec. 16, 2006, 11:23AM
Bribe culture seeps into South Texas
19 convicted as Mexican style of corruption moves north of the border

By JAMES PINKERTON
Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle
TOOLS
Email


Subscribe NOW

BROWNSVILLE — The bribe has long been a shortcut to wealth and power along the Texas-Mexico border. But these days, it's not just politicians lining their pockets or crooked lawmen taking bags of cash to overlook drug loads.

The culture of bribery is quietly seeping into new realms of government, from school districts to municipal court, experts say.

Proximity to Mexico is at least partly to blame, said Anthony Knopp, a professor who teaches border history at the University of Texas at Brownsville.

"What we're dealing with is a Third World country on the other side of the border where there is a culture of corruption ... corruption will show up here, naturally."

And show up, it has.

Since March 2004, 19 public officials including former Cameron County Sheriff Conrado Cantu, a city manager, several county commissioners, a school superintendent and several school trustees have been convicted of taking kickbacks and bribes.

Some pocketed wads of cash. Others accepted new tires for their cars or extensive remodeling jobs on their homes and businesses. Some even partied with prostitutes. In return, some allegedly awarded lucrative contracts to build or furnish new schools and public buildings. Or they looked the other way as traffickers hauled drugs across the border.

"Bribery is happening down here," said Israel Pacheco, a veteran Texas Ranger in McAllen. "To say it's not happening is to bury your head in the sand."

The way things are done
The bribery culture has existed in Mexico for centuries. There, the bribe is known as la mordida — "the bite." Paying mordidas is often the most efficient — or the only — way of getting things done in Mexico.

Federal officials in the Rio Grande Valley say they began seeing rising numbers of bribery cases several years ago, and formed a task force to target corruption and graft.

Bribery "undermines public confidence in government," said Don DeGabrielle, the U.S. attorney for the federal district that stretches from Houston to Laredo and south to Brownsville.

"When a few abuse their offices ... citizens justifiably wonder then who can they trust in the rest of government," said DeGabrielle, a former FBI agent.

He said the federal task force has led to a number of important arrests and hopes that continued prosecutions will discourage others from taking or offering bribes and kickbacks.

But for some, the temptation is too great.

A Brownsville municipal court clerk was recently sentenced to probation for fixing traffic tickets, undeterred by hundreds of police officers around her at the police station. For a "fee," a city code inspector and a permit clerk allegedly let six used-car lot owners operate in Brownsville without passing building inspections.

The culture of bribery "has filtered down to where it's not just law enforcement," a veteran U.S. agent said on condition of anonymity.

Bribery of lawmen remains a problem, he added.

"We're seeing it a lot more ... and it isn't always cash," he said. "It could be bottles of liquor, it could be a car. Sometimes it's hunting trips."

He said the motivation is always the same — greed.

"It's the money," the agent said. "As long as I've been doing this job."

Alleged entrapment
Some in the Valley blame federal authorities.

The government "creates crime" by using "unsavory" informants to entrap otherwise honest people, said Al Alvarez, a McAllen lawyer who has defended a number of public officials.

As the Valley grows and receives larger shares of state and federal funding, more and more locals get involved in government and some don't know the law, Alvarez said.

"People here don't have the experience in management ... mistakes are made, and some are criminal," Alvarez said.

Bribery cases often end in scenes like one in a Brownsville federal courthouse Nov. 10, when Israel Tamez, a tearful ex-county commissioner, stood before a federal judge.

"I know I did wrong, and I have to pay for it," said Tamez, a resident of Willacy County, one of the state's poorest.

U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen sentenced Tamez to six months in jail for taking a $10,000 bribe to award a $14.5 million jail contract.

The fallout from another federal investigation was even more tragic in the case of Ed Aparicio, 46, a popular state judge who killed himself last April on the day he announced his resignation. Although the judge was never charged with a crime, FBI agents had searched his home and courthouse chambers, carting off paintings and other potential evidence in a reported bribery investigation.

TV stations in the Valley routinely feature tales of public officials being caught allegedly pocketing bribes in exchange for a range of illegal favors.

In one case last year, the FBI arrested a trustee for the Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Independent School District and a masonry contractor, accusing them of bribery and extortion.

The McAllen Monitor, applauded the move.

"What's most disturbing isn't the way the two are accused of operating," the paper said in an editorial. "It's that officials at nearly every other school district and municipal government in the Valley conduct business in a similar manner."

In another case, the Cameron County district attorney is investigating how the Brownsville Navigation District spent $21.4 million in taxpayer money during a decade-long, futile effort to build a rail bridge to Mexico.

A private attorney hired by the district concluded $10.5 million was paid to subcontractors in Mexico who did little or no work, including a firm with close ties to Mexican officials.

Elections involved
Bribery has also crept into Valley elections, said Othal Brand Jr., who ran his father's unsuccessful campaign for mayor last year in McAllen.

A political worker offered him "400 votes for $10 apiece, or $4,000," he said.

"It short-circuits the system," Brand said of bribery. "It speeds the process up and cuts red tape. It saves time or money, but without any conscience about the morality, the right or wrong."

Some worry that even more public officials could be compromised as vast amounts of drug money flow across the Texas border.

Laredo police frequently stop cars for speeding as they head through town on their way to Mexico, finding "massive amounts of cash," said Jerry Thompson, a history professor at Texas A&M International University. "One had $400,000 in a bag in the back seat. He didn't even have it in the trunk.

"What scares me is that this drug corruption is going to corrupt the judicial system."

Undeterred, U.S. officials say they're continuing their fight against bribery in the Valley.

"It's not over," said DeGabrielle, the top U.S. prosecutor in Houston. "We are still actively engaged in investigating corruption. ... We haven't washed our hands and declared victory."

james.pinkerton@chron.com

Friday, December 08, 2006

Kenedeno Hardcopy: Del Mar Taxpayer Present and Appearing for Homework

Monday, December 04, 2006

e-mail to cornyn from me

i suggest you look at my blogpot.....regarding your commentary posted in the Corpus Christi Caller Times on November 27, 2006

stxpolitics.blogpot.com

i beleive it is only fair to inform you since you represent all of us "angry voters"

we are not angry just no longer dumb! oh and welfare reform is corporate welfare at it's most corrupt!

why do you pay NHIC 600 dollars per month per medicaid covered individual yet rich people don't pay that much for health care coverage and yet pay less for drugs than medicaid?

sound like a subsidy or entitlement to the pharmacutical industry

Sunday, December 03, 2006

if you think voters were angry .........then you aint........

Seen nothing yet mister Senator John Cornyn . the freedom of Information Act does not need your "reforms" of watt is already on the books but should you pursue the quest it will be most precarious.


usurp at your own risk

Saturday, December 02, 2006

I plan to work across party lines to open up access to government information, particularly through reform of the Freedom of Information Act. caution!

Election results sent a powerful message
November 27, 2006

WASHINGTON - I've always believed in periodic re-evaluations, and in course corrections as the results warrant. For those of us entrusted with public office, there is nothing like an election to provide information on what changes are needed.

The election results were a powerful reminder of who works for whom in our democracy. We work for the people - not the other way around.





Public officials must adhere to our principles and beliefs, but we also should remember who we work for, and who has the final say.

On Nov. 7, control of both houses of Congress was turned over from the Republicans to the Democrats.

As a Republican, I've been asked what I learned from this election. My short answer is this: our principles are sound, but we've strayed from them. Complaints about complacency and non-responsiveness reached critical levels.

Business as usual in Washington frustrated a growing number of voters, and the majority party was held accountable.

One source of frustration was the re-emergence of "earmarks," projects for their own districts sponsored by individual lawmakers.

This "porkbarrel" spending was attacked by Republicans in their successful 1994 Contract With America, and a cleanup soon followed.

But in recent years, with Republicans in charge of Congress, earmarks have returned with a vengeance. The Congressional Research Service counted some 16,500 earmarks in 2005 spending bills, at a cost of almost $50 billion. This is unconscionable, and the public knows it. I hope Congress knows it now, too.

I've heard many complaints about backroom deals and secrecy in Washington, both in Congress and the rest of government.

I've long believed the public should have far more information about the way decisions are made, so they can make an informed judgment.

In the coming congressional session, I plan to work across party lines to open up access to government information, particularly through reform of the Freedom of Information Act.

Voters were angry

I believe voters were also angry at our seeming inability to come to grips with the even bigger problems of overspending, particularly on entitlements. Health care costs in Medicaid and Medicare are rising at a double-digit rate, and the huge Baby Boomer population is preparing to retire and receive Social Security payments. Yet proposals for reforming these entitlements - to the dismay of many - have become bogged down in partisan bickering.

Another major factor in the election was documented cases of unethical behavior by congressmen, their aides, and lobbyists that in some instances crossed over into outright criminal conduct. Of course, officials from both major political parties were caught up in these charges. But the voters rightly demanded change, and the party in power was held accountable.

Frustration over Iraq was also part of the election. Some Democrats have called for a withdrawal from Iraq, either immediately or through a set timetable. In my view, that is not the correct course of action, nor is it in the long-term interest of our country or the world.

Most Americans realize that Iraq is part of a larger war against Islamic terrorism, what some have called the major struggle of the 21st century. They realize the conflict will be long, and costly, but they know it is a battle that must be joined to ensure the safety and security of our country.

I believe the American people are looking for confidence that we have a plan to win this war, not merely to carry it on.

President Bush is now re-evaluating our approach. My hope is that Democrats, now in a Congressional majority, take their criticism of our Iraq operation to a positive level, and work constructively with the president on a plan to win the war against terrorism.

Some commentators have suggested Republicans lost the majority because we were too conservative, and others have said we have not been conservative enough.

In my view, the core Republican principles remain sound: limited government, individual responsibility, and opportunity for all. We have to do a better job in the future of advocating, and delivering, on these principles.

John Cornyn is a U.S. senator from Texas. He previously served as Texas attorney general, Texas Supreme Court justice and Bexar County district judge.

Saturday, September 23, 2006

"Coconut Awards"

"GI Forum National Report," by Joe A. Ortiz. - This show once attracted attention because hosts Joe Ortiz and Rolando Garza gave away "Coconut Awards" to local Hispanics. Ortiz still runs the show while Garza has moved on to his own show.

Saturday, July 08, 2006

William Clements & Hayden Head

William P. Clements, Jr. Papers
Office of the Governor
General Counsel
Crime and Anti-Crime Files
1979-1983
6 feet
Types of records in this subseries include correspondence, memos, notes, clippings, magazine articles, position papers, drafts of legislation, speeches, federal legislation, minutes, resolutions, Attorney General's opinions, bill analyses, U. S. Supreme Court cases synopses and decisions, copies from Vernon's Civil Statutes, copies from the Code of Criminal Statutes, copies from the records of the 61st-64th Legislative Sessions, mailing lists, bill status reports, newsletters, form letters, typewriter magnetic cards, reports, court case reports, fiscal notes, legislative committee reports, lists of witnesses, lists of supporters of the Anti-Crime Package, editorials, and press releases. All of these records document the anti-crime legislative packages proposed by Governor Clements in 1979, 1981, and 1983 with the great majority of them dealing with 1981. They are grouped more or less by the three sessions of the legislature beginning with the 1983 session followed by those of 1979 and 1981. The arrangement within the three group can best be described as random. Many of the records pertaining to a particular bill for the 1981 session are kept together for most of the bills. There is considerable duplication of items among the several folders pertaining to some of the bills.
Individuals who figure prominently in these files are Chris Mealy, Assistant General Counsel; Willis Whatley, Deputy General Counsel; and David A. Dean, General Counsel.
There is some duplication between the records in this subseries and the records of the Legislative Office. This subseries contains a much more complete record of the anti-crime legislation than do the records of the Legislative Office.
These records have all been transferred into acid and lignin free folders and boxes. In that process, paper clips and other metal fasteners except staples were removed. Duplicate items within individual folders were removed and discarded. Envelopes were also removed and discarded. A few records were removed from binders to eliminate contact with acidic materials and to conserve space. Contents of original folders that were more than three-fourths inch thick were normally divided into two or more new folders. In a few cases the records were divided by types of record. The arrangement within the new folders is probably best described as random since that is how they were filed in the original folders.
The records in this subseries are in good condition. Only a few have rust stains from paper clips and other metal fasteners, and a few have bent or otherwise damaged edges from there having been too many records in some of the original folders. The bent edges have been straightened as much as possible in the new folders. A few items have stains from long contact with highly acidic red rope expansion folders and newspaper clippings. None of the boxes appear to have been wet, and none of the records have any indication of mold or mildew.
Box 31 continued
31-27 Prescription Privileges Returned to Convicted Doctors, Correspondence and copy of Texas law, 1982
31-28 Child Abuse, Correspondence, notes, and clippings, 1982
31-29 Obscenity, Clipping, 1982
31-30 Drug Related Information, Clipping, 1982
31-31 Anti-Crime Survey, Letters and suggested questions for the survey, 1982
31-32 Arson, Correspondence, program, and registration form for National Legislative Conference on Arson, 1982
31-33 Defects in Indictments, Correspondence, memos, notes, clippings, and draft legislation, 1982
31-34 Defects in Indictments, Letters responding to Governor Clements' letter requesting suggestions for an anti-crime and anti-drug legislative program, 1982
31-35 Defects in Indictments, News Articles, Article by Paul Burka, "Trial by Technicality" from Texas Monthly, April, 1982
31-36 Defects in Indictments, Documentation, Letter, notes, and drafts of a proposed legislative program, 1982
31-37 Defects in Indictments, Manuscript by Marvin Collins entitled "Indictment and Information (Federal and State)", 1982
31-38 Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule, Letters, memos, notes, clipping, report, U. S. Senate Bill 101, 97th Congress, 1st Session, and speeches concerning, 1982
31-39 Abolition of Insanity Defense, Correspondence, memos, notes, position paper, and draft legislation, 1982
31-40 Abolition of Insanity Defense, Clippings, 1982
31-41 Abolition of Insanity Defense, Seminar Paper, The Insanity Defense in Texas by Jim Stokes for the Legislative Process Seminar, 1980
31-42 States' Right to a Jury, Letters, memos, notes, clippings, and drafts of a position paper, 1982
31-43 Trial Mechanics Changes, Jury Instruction as to Parole Laws, Correspondence, memos, notes, clippings, draft legislation, bill analysis, position papers, list of witnesses, minutes of Senate Jurisprudence Committee hearing, and Attorney General's opinion, 1982
DWI (Driving while Intoxicated) and Drugs
31-44 Information on DWI, Correspondence, memos, notes, draft legislation, press release, list of members of Governor's Task Force on Traffic Safety, minutes of a meeting of the DWI subcommittee of the Task Force on Traffic Safety, newsletters, copies from the Congressional Record, and statements before a Congressional committee, 1981
31-45 Information on DWI, Report with additional views to accompany U. S. Senate Bill 2158, 97th Congress, 2d Session, 1982
31-46 Information on DWI, Governor's Task force on Traffic Safety, DWI Subcommittee, Recommendations with accompanying documents from other states, 1982
31-47 Information on DWI, Newspaper clippings, 1982
31-48 Information on DWI, Magazine articles, 1982
31-49 Information on Drugs, Letter, memos, notes, clippings, Model Imitation Controlled Substances Act, and report Trafficking in Look-Alikes: An Update, 1982
31-50 Proposition 8, Memos, clippings, and analysis of the California proposition, 1982
Box 32
32-1 Results of 1982 Crime Survey, Correspondence, memos, notes, and draft legislation, 1982
32-2 Results of 1982 Crime Survey, Correspondence, memos, notes, and clippings, 1982
32-3 Bail Bond, Correspondence, memos, notes, clippings, Attorney General's opinion, drafts of position paper, and copy of legislation on from proceedings of the 67th Legislature, Regular session, 1982
32-4 Juvenile Offense Records, Correspondence, memos, notes, clippings, and suggested changes to the Texas Family Code, 1982
32-5 Certification of Juveniles, Correspondence, memos, notes, and clippings, 1982
32-6 Confidentiality between Medical Professionals and Patients, Correspondence, memos, notes, clippings, position papers, booklet, and copies from Vernon's Civil Statutes, 1982
32-7 Child Pornography, Correspondence, memos, notes, position papers, draft legislation, minutes of a hearing before the Texas Senate Jurisprudence Committee, resolutions of the San Antonio City Council, and U. S. Supreme Court decision in the case of New York V. Ferber, 1981-1982
32-8 Child Pornography, Clippings and report Sexual Exploitation of Children--A Problem of Unknown Magnitude by the U. S. General Accounting Office to the chairman of the Subcommittee on Select Education, 1982
32-9 Victim Secrecy, Clipping and notes, 1982
32-10 Crime Poll, Letters, notes, and booklet of questions for the Texas Crime Poll: Special Survey on Legislative Issues, 1982
32-11 "Look-Alike Drugs," Clipping, 1982
32-12 Mental Retardation Legislation, Clipping, 1982
32-13 Trial Mechanics Changes, Waiver on Right of Appeal on Plea of True, Position Paper, 1982
32-14 Police Immunity to Prosecution, Notes, 1982
32-15 Car Registration and Identification, Letters, 1982
32-16 Oral Confession, Correspondence, memos, notes, position papers, minutes of the Texas Senate Jurisprudence Committee, and copy of Texas Senate bill 121, 67th Legislature, Regular Session, 1981-1982
32-17 Anti-Crime Bills, Synopsis of Law and Order Legislation Passed by 67th Legislature, 1981
32-18 Anti-Crime/Anti-Drug Package Mail Out, Copies of letters Governor Clements sent criminal justice professionals, professional organizations, and citizens about the legislative package passed by the 67th Legislature, 1981
32-19 Anti-Crime Package, General and Miscellaneous, Form letters, note, press release, list of bills with names of House and Senate sponsors, and Synopsis of Bills Contained in Governor Clements' Anti-Crime Package, 1980-1981
32-20 Anti-Crime Package, General Support, Correspondence, 1981
32-21 Anti-Crime Package, 1982, Recommendations, Draft form letters, note, and memo, 1981
32-22 Juvenile Illegal Aliens, Crime, Correspondence, memos, notes, clipping, speeches, and final report of the Juvenile Alien Borderlands Conference, 1973-1981
32-23 Anti-Crime Package, 1983, Letters to District Attorneys, Copies of form letters to District Attorneys, police officers and sheriffs and memo of recommendations for the anti-crime package, 1981
Anti-Crime Package, Letters. Correspondence
32-24 General Correspondence, memos, notes, lists of contacts, draft legislation, and testimony before a congressional committee, 1979-1982
32-25 Form letters sent by Governor Clements to numerous groups of persons, mailing lists, memos, notes, list of bills with bill numbers and names of Senate and House sponsors, drafts of legislation, bill analyses, and synopsis of bills contained in Governor Clements' anti-crime package, 1980-1981
32-26 Memos, notes, bill analysis, and and copies of legislation, 1980-1981
32-27 Status reports on the bills in the package, 1981
32-28 Clippings, 1980
32-29 Bail Bond Bill, Senate Bill 727, Letter and memo, 1981
32-30 Clements Crime Package, 1979, Press release and message to the 66th legislature listing the issued to be addressed and declaring them emergency issued, 1979
32-31 Correspondence, Supporters of Anti-Crime/Anti-Drug Package, Letters and resolution, 1981
32-32 Anti-Crime Reports, Anti-Crime Legislative Suggestions for the 1983 Regular Session of the Texas Legislature and State Law and the Confidentiality of Juvenile Records, 1982
32-33 Determinate Sentencing, Correspondence, memos, notes, and position papers, 1982
32-34 Determinate Sentencing, Clippings and magazine articles, 1977-1982
32-35 Determinate Sentencing, Reports, Texas Youth Council Review of Proposal for Certification, Mandatory Transfer and Determinate Sentencing for Violent Juvenile Offenders and Mandatory Sentencing: The Experience of Two States, Policy Brief of the U. S. Department of Justice, 1982
32-36 Trial Mechanics Changes, Testimony Regarding Reputation, Punishment Stage, Note and drafts of position paper, 1982
32-37 Supporters List, 1983 Anti-Crime Package, List of five names with addresses
32-38 Notice of Alibi Defense, State's Right to a Fair Trial, Note, position papers, and copies from U. S. Code Annotated, 1982
32-39 Trial Mechanics Changes, Accomplice Witness Rule, Letter, memos, notes, drafts of position paper, and copy from Code of Criminal Statutes, 1982
32-40 Victims/Witness Protection, State Bar of Texas, Crime in the Streets Committee, Correspondence and proposed legislation, 1982
32-41 Anti-Crime Package, 1983, Memo, Proposal Summaries and Detailed Briefs of the parts of the package including Insanity Defense, Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule, Defects in Indictments, Jury Instruction as to Parole Laws, States' Right to a Jury, Privilege of Confidentiality between Medical Professionals and Patients, Material Harmful to Minors, Central State Depository for Juvenile Offense Records, Certification of Juveniles as Adults and Determinate Sentences in Juvenile Court, Bail Bond Bill, Determinate Sentencing, Punishment State-Reputation Testimony, Notice of Alibi Defense, Accomplice Witness Rule, and Parallel Liability for Actual Medical, Legal, and Placement Expenses Resulting from a Negligent or Willful Act of a Child, 1982
32-42 Anti-Crime Package, 1983, Listing of Supporters of Proposals, Lists of people for each of the items listed in 32-41, most pages are blank, 1982
32-43 Anti-Crime Speeches, List of three speeches by Chris Mealey, Assistant General Counsel, 1982
32-44 Anti-Crime Package, 1983, Correspondence, notes, and clippings, 1982
32-45 Anti-Crime Package, 1983, Recommendations for 1982 Anti-Crime Program, Possible Subjects for Inclusion in the 1983 Anti-Crime Program, and two proposals not included, Mandatory Pre-sentence Investigation and Suspension of Juvenile's Driver's License for a Non-Traffic Offense, 1982
32-46 Anti-Crime Package, 1983, Notes, listing of Possible Subjects for Inclusion in, mailing lists, and position papers consolidated by Jan Lindsey for Jim Kaster, David Dean, and Hillary Doran, 1982
32-47 Anti-Crime Package, 1983, Position papers/summaries of proposals, 1982
32-48 Anti-Crime Package, 1983, Final consolidation of final rough drafts of position papers/summaries of proposals and summaries of those documents for Governor Clements with options to check off for inclusion, 1982
32-49 Anti-Crime Package, 1983, Correspondence, memos, notes, press releases, clippings, drafts for form letters sent to various groups, lists of groups receiving form letters, reports of anti-crime packages in other states, and syllabus of U. S. Supreme Court case Village of Hoffman Estates, et al. V. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 1982
32-50 Anti-Crime Package, 1976, Proposals that were withdrawn, Mandatory Sentencing, Notes, Clippings, and copies of articles, 1976
32-51 Anti-Crime Package, 1979, Proposals that were withdrawn, Drugs, Letter, copy of acto of the New York Senate relating to controlled substances, and draft of the final report of the Joint Committee on New York Drug Law Evaluation, 1977-1979
Box 33
33-1 Anti-Crime Package, 1979, Proposals that were withdrawn, Drugs, Report, The Nation's Toughest Drug Law: Evaluating the New York Experience, Final Report of the Joint Committee on New York Drug Law Evaluation, 1978
33-2 Anti-Crime Package, 1979, Proposals that were withdrawn, Sentencing, Memo and copies of Law Enforcement Assistance Administration publications, 1979
33-4 Anti-Crime Package, 1979, Proposals that were withdrawn, Mandatory Gun Law, Letter and report The Impact of the Mandatory Gun Law in Massachusetts, 1979
33-4 Proposed Legislation, Use of Firearm, Drafts of legislation, 1981
33-5 Anti-Crime Package, Response to Governor Clements Request for Input, Letters, memo, and draft legislation, 1980
33-6 Anti-Crime Package, Supporters of, Correspondence, memos, notes, clippings, resolutions, newsletters, and draft legislation, 1980-1981
33-7 Proposed Legislation, Correspondence, memos, notes, clippings, press releases, draft legislation, and ranking of proposed legislation, 1979-1980
33-8 Mailout to All Law Enforcement, Newspaper Editors, TV and Radio Stations, Form letters and typewriter magnetic cards, June, 1981
33-9 Anti-Crime Package, 1981 Form letters and typewriter magnetic cards, 1980
33-10 Proposed Legislation, Drug Paraphernalia, Letter, resolution, City of Irving City Ordinance, and order of the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas in the case of David Clark, d/b/a L. O. Goodbuy V. City of Irving,, 1982
33-11 Proposed Legislation, Narcotics, Memos, note, draft legislation, and bill analysis, 1981
33-12 Proposed Legislation, Licensing Act, Notes, drafts of legislation, and bill analysis, 1981
33-13 Proposed Legislation, Traffic, Memos, notes, and draft legislation, 1982
33-14 Proposed Legislation, House Floor and Committee Action on 1977 Anti-Crime Bills and 1979 Wiretap Bill, Memos and records of actions taken in both the House and the Senate, 1981
33-15 Proposed Legislation, Criminal Justice Coordinating Council, Draft legislation creating, 1981
Proposed Legislation, War on Drugs Package
33-16 Drug Paraphernalia Laws, Letter, sample laws from Colorado and West Virginia, draft legislation, bill analysis, and executive summary
33-17 Illegal Trafficking in Controlled Substances, Enhances Penalties, Memos, clipping, drafts of legislation, executive summary, and bill analyses, 1979-1981
33-18 Amendment to Conspiracy, Executive summary, 1981
33-19 Forfeiture of Proceeds of Drug Related Property, Executive Summary, 1981
33-20 Revocation of License, Drafts of legislation, executive summary, and bill analysis, 1981
33-21 Triplicate Prescription, Drafts of legislation, executive summary, and bill analysis, 1981
33-22 Destruction of Excess Quantities, Executive Summary, 1981
33-23 Delivery of Controlled Substance to a Minor, Drafts of legislation and executive summary, 1981
33-24 Criminal Justice Division, Continuation, Correspondence, memos, notes, clippings, resolution, draft legislation, bill analyses, report on Ten Years of Accomplishments of the LEAA Program in Texas, lists of supporters and contacts, and telegrams, 1980-1981
33-25 Governor Clements Crime Control Package, 1981, General Support, Correspondence, memos, notes, newsletter, brochure, recommendations for items to include, and background information on issues, 1979-1980
33-26 Federal Legislation, Correspondence, memos, notes, newsletters, clippings, briefing paper, and form letters regarding the adoption of a federal budget and continuation of and budget for the LEAA (Legal Enforcement Assistance Administration), 1980
33-27 Federal Legislation, Report of the Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives, to accompany H. Cong. Res. 307, 96th Congress, 2nd Session, and copy of the resolution, 1980
33-28 Federal Legislation, Report from the Committee on Appropriations to accompany H. R. 7325, Supplemental Appropriations and Recisions Bill, 96th Congress, 2d Session, memo, and Report of the U. S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary to accompany S. 2377, 96th Congress, 2d Session, 1980
33-29 Federal Legislation, Testimony of James B. Hunt, Jr. and Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., before U. S. House committees on bills to amend the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, 1980
33-30 Criminal Justice Division, Grants, Report of Action Grants by Programs for FY 1969 giving grant number, name of grantee, grant title, amount of grant, and adjustment to grant, no date,
33-31 Criminal Justice Division, Status of 1978-1980 Program Funding, Action Funds, July 2, 1980
33-32 Criminal Justice Division, Report on Grants by Region giving grant number, name of grantee, title, program status, award date, dates of grant period, and amount of award, March 31, 1980
33-33 Criminal Justice Division, Report on Active Grants by Region giving grant number, name of grantee, title, program area, status, award date, dates of grant period, and amount of grants, August 13, 1980
33-34 Governor's 1981 Anti-Crime Package, Letters from members of the Legislature about, 1981
33-35 Criminal Justice Associations, Letters about anti-crime legislation in Texas and letter and statement of U. S. Senator John Glenn regarding the Anti-Arson Act of 1981, 1981
Letters of Support for Governor Clements' 1981 Anti-Crime Program from Elected Officials and Others in Various Counties, 1981
33-36 Angelina, Atascosa, Bexar, Bosque, Brazoria, Briscoe, Cameron, Collin, Dallas, Deaf Smith, Ector, Galveston, Grayson, Hale, Harris, Henderson, Hidalgo, Hopkins, Jack, Jasper, Llano, and Lubbock Counties
33-37 Mason, McClennan, Montgomery, Moore, Navarro, Nueces, Orange, Parker, Potter, Randall, Real, Rusk, Tarrant, Terry, Tom Green, Travis, Victoria, Walker, Webb,. Wharton, Wise, and Zavala Counties {Note: In most cases there are only one or two letters per county. There were also folders for the following counties, but they were all empty: Childress, Dallam, Denton, Dickens, Dimmit, Floyd, Hartley, Motley, Newton, Sherman, Tyler, and Zapata Counties.)
33-38 Miscellaneous Anti-Crime Information, Correspondence, memos, notes, bill status reports, bill analyses, draft legislation, position paper, Dallas Chamber of Commerce Legislative program, press release, list of Senate committees with names of members for the 67th Legislature, Regular Session, list of issues in the 1981 anti-crime package with names of House and Senate sponsors, lists of House and Senate members, results of second primary elections for House and Senate elections, list of House members in order of seniority, 1981
33-39 Miscellaneous Anti-Crime Information, Clippings, September-December, 1980
33-40 Miscellaneous Anti-Crime Information, Clippings, January, 1981
33-41 Miscellaneous Anti-Crime Information, Clippings, February, 1981
Box 34
34-1 Miscellaneous Anti-Crime Information, Clippings, March, 1981
34-2 Miscellaneous Anti-Crime Information, Clippings, April, 1981
34-3 Miscellaneous Anti-Crime Information, Clippings, May-June, 1981
34-4 Licensing of Ex-Inmates, Letter, memos, notes, drafts of legislation, bill analyses, and veto proclamations, 1979-1981
34-5 Miscellaneous Anti-Crime Bills, Memos, notes, draft legislation, bill analyses, bill status reports, lists of bills pending in committees, summary of legislation passed in Governor Briscoe's anti-crime package, and record of anti-crime bills giving bill number, name of sponsor, subject, and status report, 1981
34-6 Shock Probation, House Bill 363, Senate Bill 123, Draft Legislation and bill analysis, 1981
34-7 Shock Probation Amendments, Drafts of legislation, bill analyses, and Attorney General's opinion, 1981
34-8 Amendment of Shock Probation Statute, Senate Bill 123, Letters, memos, notes, drafts of legislation, bill analyses, committee reports, clippings, and lists of offenses with penalties for each, 1980-1981
34-9 Amendment to Shock Probation Statute, Clippings, 1980-1981
34-10 Amendment to Shock Probation Statute, Becky's drafts, Letters, memos, drafts of legislation, reports of the number of shock probation cases, drafts of legislation, bill analyses, and typewriter magnetic cards, 1980-1981
34-11 Amendment of Shock Probation Law, Draft legislation, [1980]
34-12 Aggravated Rape and Sexual Abuse, Editorials, Clippings, 1981 [Note: Not all clippings are editorials.]
34-13 Wiretap, House Bill 360, Senate Bill 120, Draft of House Bill 360 and bill analysis, 1981
34-14 Amendments to the Aggravated Rape and Sexual Abuse Statutes, Draft legislation and card with notice to legislators to notify the Legislative Council of any changes to a bill before introducing it, [1981?]
34-15 Instruction of Jury at to Parole Laws, Letters, memos, notes, drafts of legislation, bill analyses, and typewriter magnetic cards, 1980-1981
34-16 Bill Status Reports, Memos and status reports on the several bills that were part of Governor Clements" anti-crime package in 1981, February-May, 1981
Wiretap Bill
34-17 Notes, clipping, and report Can a Texas District Court Issue a Court Order Directing the Phone Company to Assist in the Installation of a Pen Register, 1981
34-18 Memos, notes, draft legislation, bill analyses, analysis of Senate amendments to House Bill 360, and typewriter magnetic cards, 1981
34-19 Notes, drafts of legislation, drafts of amendments, and bill analysis, 1981
34-20 Notes, drafts of legislation, drafts of amendments, bill analysis, record of Senate floor action, and typewriter magnetic cards, 1981
34-21 Drafts of legislation, drafts of amendments, analysis of Senate amendments, and second printing of Senate amendments, 1981
34-22 Memos, notes, drafts of legislation, suggested amendments, bill analysis, recommendations for safeguards on electronic surveillance, and notes from a Criminal Jurisprudence Committee meeting on the Wiretap bill, 1981
34-23 Letters, memos, notes, draft legislation, bill analysis, drafts of amendments, press release, list of witnesses, records of support for the bill in the House, and record of House votes, 1980-1981
34-24 Letter and reports, Conduct of Wire/Oral Interception Technical Unit Responsibilities and the Texas Electronic Surveillance Law, 1981
34-25 Information packet containing bill analysis of House Bill 360, electronic surveillance position paper, suggested amendments, data transmission lines, call forwarding, Senate floor action, 1979, supports of the anti-crime package, and articles and editorials in support of House Bill 360,
34-26 Senate Journal for April 16 and May 23, 1981 and Senate Agendas for May 20 and 23, 1981
34-27 House Journal for May 1, 4, 28, 30, and 32, 1981
34-28 Clippings, 1979-1980
34-29 Clippings, January-February, 1981
34-30 Clippings, March-May, 1981
34-31 Clippings, June-September, 1981
34-32 Bill Status Reports, Periodic Status Reports on bills in Governor Clements' anti-crime package, March-May, 1981
34-33 Letter, memos, notes, drafts of legislation, and bill analyses, 1980-1981
34-34 Memo and Senate Committee floor votes on 1977 Anti-Crime Package and 1979 Wiretap Bill, 1981
34-35 Memo and transcript of Federal Bureau of Investigation testimony before the House Committee on Wiretapping, 1979
34-36 Report, Wiretapping by the House Study Group, 1980
Box 35
35-1 Report, Electronic Surveillance In Law Enforcement: Background and Analysis, Staff Report, Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence, Texas House of Representatives, 1979
35-2 Report, Wire Interception and Interception of Oral Communications, copied from the U. S. Code Annotated, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, 1977
35-3 Report, Electronic Surveillance, Report of the National Commission for the Review of Federal and State Laws Relating to Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance, 1976
35-4 Report, Gains Made in Controlling Illegal Drugs, Yet the Drug Trade Flourishes, Report to the Congress of the United States by the Comptroller General, 1979
35-5 Letters, memos, notes, draft legislation, bill analysis, drafts of position paper on wiretap, resolution, and Attorney General's opinion, 1979-1980
35-6 Copies of court case reports, and copies of three appendices to an unidentified report consisting of abstracts of newspaper articles, newspaper clippings, and transcript of a hearing before the U. S. House Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice on surveillance legislation, 1979
35-7 Journals and newsletters, 1979
35-8 Correspondence, memos, notes, drafts of position paper, resolution, clippings, Attorney General's opinion, summaries of wiretap legislation in other states, and statement of James B. Adams before the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee, 1979-1980
35-9 Drafts of legislation (Senate Bill 981) and bill analyses, 1980
35-10 Rape, House Bill 364, Senate Bill 124, Draft legislation on aggravated rape and aggravated sexual abuse and bill analysis, 1980-1981
35-11 Aggravated Rape and Aggravated Sexual Abuse, Memos, drafts of legislation, and bill analyses, 1980-1981
35-12 Amendments to aggravated rape and aggravated sexual abuse statutes, Senate Bill 124, Letters, memos, notes, drafts of legislation, bill analyses, subcommittee report, case report on Rucker V. State of Texas, press release on bills signed, and record of Senate vote on House Bill 364, 1980-1981
35-13 Amendments to aggravated rape and aggravated sexual abuse statutes, Becky's drafts, Letters, memos, notes, drafts of legislation, and bill analyses, 1980-1981
35-14 Amendments to aggravated rape and aggravated sexual abuse statutes, Senate Agendas for April 7, 8, and 22 and Senate Journal for April 21, 1981
35-15 Offenses Against Children, House Bill 366, Senate Bill 126, Draft legislation and bill analysis, 1981
35-16 Offenses Against Children, Drafts of legislation and bill analyses, 1980-1981
35-17 Offenses Against Children, Correspondence, memos, notes, drafts of legislation, bill analyses, committee reports, and fiscal note, 1980-1981
35-18 Offenses Against Children, KDFW-TV Editorial and Responses, Note and Packets containing a copy of the Dallas station's editorial and of responses from citizens, 1980
35-19 Offenses Against Children, Senate Agendas for March 10 and 17, April 2 and 30, and May 5 and 7, 1981
35-20 Board of Pardons and Paroles, House Bill 365, Senate Bill 125, Drafts of legislation and bill analysis, 1980-1981
35-21 Board of Pardons and Paroles, Memo, drafts of legislation, and bill analyses, 1980-1981
35-22 Board of Pardons and Paroles, Correspondence, memos, notes, list of witnesses, records of votes in the Senate and House, fiscal notes, House seating chart, records of anticipated support of House members, and newsletter, 1980- 1981
35-23 Board of Pardons and Paroles, Correspondence, memos, notes, Attorney General's opinion, records of voting by individual members of the Board, general information on the Board, position paper on overcrowding in prisons, analysis of parole approvals and denials by Governor Clements, and report on whether or not the combination of probation and parole into one agency would violate the Texas constitution, 1980-1981
35-24 Board of Pardons and Paroles, Clippings, 1977-1981
35-25 Board of Pardons and Paroles, Memos, notes, drafts of legislation, bill analyses, and fiscal notes, 1980-1981
35-26 Board of Pardons and Paroles, Committee reports, drafts of legislation, bill analyses, and fiscal notes, 1980-1981
35-27 Board of Pardons and Paroles, House Journal for February 3, 1981, and Senate Journal for April 13 and 15, 1981
35-28 Board of Pardons and Paroles, Letters, memos, notes, background information, cover memos to House and Senate members for 1980 parole study, list of witnesses, and draft letter to newspaper editors, 1980-1981
35-29 Board of Pardons and Paroles, Notes, drafts of legislation, bill analyses, fiscal notes, and typewriter magnetic cards, 1980-1981
35-30 Instruction of Jury as to Parole Laws, House Bill 362, Senate Bill 122, Draft legislation and bill analysis, 1980
35-31 Instruction to Jury as to Parole Laws, Letters, memos, notes, Attorney General's opinion, minutes of Senate Jurisprudence Committee hearing, record of committee and Senate floor action, case report on Sanders V. State of Texas, typewriter magnetic cards, and Senate agenda for May 31, 1981, 1980-1981
35-32 Instructions to Jury as to Parole Laws, Notes, drafts of legislation, and bill analyses, 1980-1981
35-33 State's Right to Appeal, Note and magazine, 1981
Box 36
36-1 Oral Confessions, House Bill 361, Senate Bill 121, Draft legislation and bill analysis, 1981
36-2 Oral Confessions, Letter, memos, notes, lists of witnesses, record of anticipated support in Senate, records of House votes, record of Senate committee and floor action, fiscal note, typewriter magnetic card, Senate Journal for April 16, 1981, and Senate Agendas for March 24 and 31, 1980-1981
36-3 Oral Confessions, Drafts of legislation, bill analyses, and fiscal note, 1980-1981
36-4 Oral Confessions, Clippings, 1981
36-5 Criminal Justice Division Bill, House Bill 367, Senate Bill 127, Drafts of legislation and bill analyses, 1980-1981
36-6 Criminal Justice Division Bill, Letters, memos, notes, lists of supporters and witnesses, bill analysis, bill comparisons, copies from Vernon's Civil Statutes, and typewriter magnetic cards, 1980-1981
36-7 Criminal Justice Division Bill, Memos, notes, and reports on funding for the CJD grants from the CJD, and typewriter magnetic cards, 1980-1981
36-8 Criminal Justice Division Bill, Drafts of legislation, bill analyses, fiscal notes, and typewriter magnetic cards, 1980-1981
36-9 Criminal Justice Division Bill, Amendments to bill and typewriter magnetic cards, 1980-1981
36-10 Criminal Justice Division Bill, Clippings, 1981
36-11 Criminal Justice Division Bill, Senate Journal, February 11 and 12, 1981 and Senate Agendas, May 25, 26, and 29 and June 1, 1981
36-12 Bail Bond Bill, House Bill 368, Senate Bill 128, Draft legislation, 1980
36-13 Bail Bond Bill, Correspondence, memos, notes, bill comparisons, clippings, Attorney General's opinion, and report on the bill as passed, 1980-198
36-14 Bail Bond Bill, Drafts of legislation and bill analyses, 1980-1981
36-15 Bail Bond Bill, Drafts of legislation, bill analyses, and fiscal note, 1980-1981
36-16 Bail Bond Bill, Drafts of legislation and bill analyses, 1980-1981
36-17 Bail Bond Bill, Drafts of legislation, bill analyses, fiscal note, and notes, 1980-1981
36-18 Bail Bond Bill, Amendments, 1981
36-19 Offenses Against Children, Correspondence, notes, clippings, drafts of legislation, and list of witnesses, 1980-1981
36-20 Juvenile Probation Commission Bill, Draft legislation, bill analysis, changes in legislation, and typewriter magnetic card, [1981?]
36-21 Juvenile Probation Commission Bill, Drafts of legislation and bill analyses, 1980-1981
36-22 Juvenile Probation Commission Bill, Drafts of legislation and bill analyses, 1980-1981
36-23 Juvenile Probation Commission Bill, Correspondence, memos, notes, newsletters, budget request, and press release, 1979-1981
36-24 Juvenile Probation Commission Bill, Correspondence, memos, notes, newsletter, and testimony on troubled youth before a Senate committee, 1979-1981
36-25 Juvenile Probation Commission Bill, Correspondence, memos, notes, newsletter, press release, clippings, and Senate agenda for May 30, 1981, 1979-1981
Box 37
37-1 Ordinance Authority, Materials Harmful to Minors, Correspondence, memos, notes, clippings, records of House votes, record of anticipated support in the House, and typewriter magnetic cards, 1980-1981
37-2 Ordinance Authority, Materials Harmful to Minors, Drafts of legislation, fiscal notes, and bill analyses, 1980-1981
37-3 Ordinance Authority, Materials Harmful to Minors, Case reports from the U. S. Supreme Court, Young V. American Mini Theatres, Inc. and Paris Adult Theatre V. Slaton; the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, Harper V. Lindsay, Stansberry V. Holmes, and Pollard V. Cockrell; and Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Berg V. State of Texas, 1980
37-4 Anti-Crime Package, General and Miscellaneous, Memos, notes, newsletter, drafts of legislation in the package, bill analyses, lists of members and committees in the House and Senate, list of bills in the package with bill numbers and House and Senate sponsors, press release, and brochure, 1980-1981
37-5 Drafts of form letters about Anti-Crime Package, Letters, memos, notes, drafts of letters for Hayden Head, Sr., William B. Blakemore, II, J. A. Whittenberg, III, and W. C. "Bill" Perryman to send to legislators and newspaper editors, lists of legislators and newspaper editors for each of the four, maps of Texas on which are outlined the regions to which each of the four sent letters, copy for a radio spot announcement for Perryman, and lists of daily and weekly papers in Texas, 1981
37-6 Miscellaneous Anti-Crime/Drug Thank You Letters, Letters to Governor Clements from judges, justices of the peace, and police chiefs, 1981
37-7 Phone Lists for 67th Legislature, Lists of members of the Senate Jurisprudence Committee and the House Committees on Security and Sanctions, Criminal Jurisprudence, Intergovernmental Affairs, and State Affairs giving members phone numbers and names and phone numbers of all District Attorneys in each member's district, 1981
37-8 Amusement Machine Commission, Letters, memos, notes, fiscal notes, copies from Vernon's Civil Statutes, copies from records of the 61st, 62nd, 63rd, and 64th Legislatures, Staff Report to the Sunset Advisory Commission, historical background information, and 1979 annual financial report and inventory, 1980
37-9 Press Release and Backup for November 1980 Crime Poll, Letter, press releases, clipping, question booklets for poll, and reports Legislative Proposals about Crime and Criminal Justice: Special Editor of the Texas Crime Poll and Responding to Child Sexual Abuse: A Report to the 67th Legislature, and record of legislation proposed by Governor Clements with summary provisions of each bill and summary of response form the crime poll, 1981
37-10 Weekly Status Reports, 67th Legislative Session, Memos, press release, mailing list, copy of Governor Clements' State of the State Address, and typewriter magnetic cards, January-June, 1981
37-11 Anti-Crime Package, General and Miscellaneous, Correspondence, memos, notes, mailing lists, thank you letters to legislators who sponsored bills, and typewriter magnetic cards, 1980-1981
37-12 Governor Clements Press Release, Press release of January 12, 1981 with list of bills in the Anti-Crime Package and synopsis of each bill and copies of cover memos to those to whom the memo was sent, 1981
37-13 Letters to Radio and TV Stations, Copies of form letter, typewriter magnetic cards, and copies of items included in the package sent to stations including list of bills with bill numbers and Senate and House Sponsors, and bill analysis of each bill, 1981

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

WATTS has emerged as a powerful player in South Texas politics. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure it out

Remember how this whole thing started?

The Polls?

Shamsie and the domino effect?

I beleive WATTS will back Danny Noyola.

Soli has his own support and it is certainly formidable.

Let us see what these guys will bring to our community?

Show us dont tell us!





HD-33: Who Will Rise to Replace Luna?

by: Unnamed Source Wed Jul 05, 2006 at 13:52:10 PM MDT
(Here's a good introduction as to who may be running to replace Vilma Luna in HD-33. - promoted by Karl-Thomas Musselman)Although this shake-up comes as a surprise to many, it is not completely unexpected. One of the candidates expected to run is former Nueces County Chair Solomon Ortiz, Jr. When Ortiz, Jr., son of the longest-tenured Democratic Congressman in Texas announced his intention not to run for re-election, many assumed that he had higher ambitions (including rumors about challenging Luna for her established Democratic seat).
Also expected to seek the nomination for District 33 is Danny Noyola, Sr., a community leader and high school administrator. Noyola was recently ousted as principal of problem-ridden Miller High School in Corpus Christi. He took over the school deemed "low-performing" by the federal government and made little progress during his tenure. He served only one year in his position before being "re-assigned" to an assistant principal position at neighboring Moody High School. Several teachers disapproved of his leadership style and the cause for his demotion is still unclear.
Noyola, Sr. has been active throughout the community. He has served as President of the Corpus Christi Barrios Association, a neighborhood improvement organization. His brother Jesse Noyola is a powerful City Councilman and his son Danny Noyola, Jr. was recently elected to the State Democratic Executive Committee for SD 20.
It is also worth noting that Noyola is disliked by many in the Corpus community for his support of Republican candidates in several races. They include Mayor Loyd Neal and County Commissioner Joe McComb.
The seat has no Republican challenger for the November election. Since the 45 precinct chairs of the 33rd State House District will decide the person to replace Luna on the ballot, that group will basically be selecting Corpus Christi’s newest State Representative. The only other way to win the seat would be a well-orchestrated write-in campaign.
The vote has yet to be called by Nueces County Chair Alex Garcia. It should be close. Solomon Ortiz, Jr. is respected throughout the community and knows many of the precinct chairs from his role as County Chair. Noyola knows many of the precinct chairs himself., including his wife Precinct 116 Chair Alma Noyola.
Incidentally, outgoing State Rep. Vilma Luna works for trial lawyer Mikal Watts in Corpus Christi. He has emerged as a powerful player in South Texas politics and will likely seek the Presidency of the Texas Trial Lawyers Association during the next election. He has funded Luna extensively over the years, as well as County and State House candidates in this election cycle. At this point, it is unclear who Mikal Watts supports, but his opinion most definitely matters to candidates seeking the election in District 33.
Unnamed Source :: HD-33: Who Will Rise to Replace Luna?
Tags: HD-33, Vilma Luna, Solomon Ortiz Jr., Danny Noyola Sr., Texas Politics

Sunday, July 02, 2006

To those who ask what is in the best interest of Corpus Christi Independent School District, the answer is simple: Reinstate Danny Noyola to Miller.

Reinstate Noyola

I was shocked to hear that Danny Noyola was reassigned from being Miller principal to Moody assistant principal. Mr. Noyola over the last year has been a walking, talking billboard for Miller High School and has the results to prove success.

Miller had higher TAKS scores than Moody and Ray in the toughest of subjects: math and science. An increase in attendance also occurred in Noyolas one year at Miller. Noyola helped put on a huge homecoming parade that included students, faculty, and alumni. He was trying, and was succeeding, at bringing back that Miller spirit.

Mr. Noyola helped put togher an all-Buc career fair to show the young Miller Bucs that they can be anything they want to be. He was in the process of implementing a freshman academy for the upcoming school year.

Still, one of the most impressive things I have seen with Mr. Noyola was that during the school year he made close to 200 home visits by himself. How many principals could do all that in one year?

To those who ask what is in the best interest of Corpus Christi Independent School District, the answer is simple: Reinstate Danny Noyola to Miller.

Rene Guzman

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Juan Garcia in the News

If you are in Corpus this Memorial Day Weekend...
then you should swing by Juan Garcia's 40th Birthday Party.

Spend the Sunday evening of Memorial Day Weekend or May 28th in the shadow of the USS Lexington at the Blue Ghost Landing Beach Bar, and join Juan for his 40th Birthday Celebration.

Free admission. Join us between 6-10 PM for an evening of dancing, drinks, and a special live performance by Juan's rock band, with surprise special guests!

(And the much requested "Army of Juan" t-shirts will be available).

For more information please log on to Juan's web site:
www.electjuangarcia.com

Remember, Monday is Memorial Day so you don't have to go to work (hopefully)...

Posted by Eddie on 05/25/2006 at 11:24 AM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Sparkling City by the Sea Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (0)
Gene Seaman already running scared


10-year incumbent Rep. Gene Seaman may publicly say he's not worried about the challenge from first time candidate Lt. Cmd Juan Garcia, but that's not what he's telling his inner circle.

In a March 27, 2006 letter to previous donors, Seaman wrote that he is "engaged in a major fight", and exhorted them to "consider doubling or tripling your annual donation." Click here (letter.pdf) to see actual letter.







Seaman has also been paying about $6,500 a month for three large commercial billboards bearing his likeness around the district, 10 months before the election. That is around $32,500 on freaking billboards.


Good thing he's not worried....
Continue reading "Gene Seaman already running scared" »

Posted by Eddie on 05/11/2006 at 10:38 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (1)
Juan Garcia ~ In the News
Juan Garcia has a been a busy man lately. Garcia, candidate for HD 32, was all over the newspapers this Sunday.

On Thursday, Juan Garcia introduced his Harvard classmate Sen. Barrack Obama (D-IL) at fundraiser in Austin. Present at the event was another Harvard Law classmate, Juan's wife Denise Garcia.








I attended this event and beside the impressive speeches by both Juan Garcia and Sen. Obama, I was shocked by how many young people was there. The packed room was filled by high school and college-aged supporters. I go to my share of these events and I am happy to see that there is a new generation of active participation in politics.

There was also great article written in the SA Express News in Carlos Guerra's column.


A second-generation naval aviator, he had risen to lieutenant commander when he left active duty in a career that included 30 armed missions over the Persian Gulf, one of which ended with an emergency landing during a sandstorm. In the process, he also was appointed White House fellow.

[....]

"A lot of the analysts said, 'That district is not going to elect someone whose name ends in a vowel,' and in the past, it is undeniable: They voted in droves against the Hispanic candidate," García says. "But I choose to believe that this campaign is emblematic in closing that chapter in our history.

"I think that the right person with the right qualifications and the right message and vision can close that chapter so we can get to the issues we all care about," he adds.

And such political divisiveness isn't limited to race issues.

"There are issues out there, education, property taxes, services, that also transcend party," he says. That's why he picked fellow pilot [Joe] Hall — a Republican — for his campaign treasurer. "I wanted to send a message."



This is guy is the real deal. It is nice to see a campaign trying to woo the entire district on real issues. I expect Seaman will probably try to create some false wedge issue to divide the district. I am glad Garcia is focused on what really matters in the district.

Garcia also spoke at annual earth day festival at Cole Park on Saturday. He talked about how Texas leads the nation in polluters but fails to adequately monitor the polluters. Apparently, polluters in Texas self report their emissions. Hmmm... kinda like putting Michael Jackson in charge of the day care. This kind of self-serving industry practice will not change until we see a real change in our elected officials.

Garcia has also been busy securing the restoration of the Dr. Hector P. Garcia (no relation) office builiding. He was the first Mexican American to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom. This is the highest award a civilian can receive. Dr. Garcia organized the American G.I. Forum (1948) initially to improve veteran benefits and enhance medical attention. But it soon expanded to address educational and vocational training, housing, public education, poll taxation, voter registration, hospitalization and employment. Today the American G. I. Forum has nearly 160,000 members in 502 chapters in 24 states.


Posted by Eddie on 04/23/2006 at 11:02 AM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (1) TrackBack (1)
Richard Morrison: Help Juan Garcia defeat Seaman and his dirty DeLay money
I just recieved an email from Richard Morrison supporting Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia and his bid to unseat Gene Seaman in HD 32. It reads:

Former Congressman Tom DeLay. Has a nice ring to it, doesn't it?

When I ran against him two years ago, I talked about the sheer reach of his corrupt Texans for a Republican Majority political action committee (TRMPAC).

This year, my friend Juan Garcia is running against one of biggest beneficiaries of that corruption -- State Rep. Gene Seaman, the Republican real estate developer from Corpus Christi.

That's why I'm writing you today -- to ask you to join me in supporting Juan so that we can continue to clean up the House and rid Texas politics of DeLay's allies.

Juan is the new face of leadership in Texas -- dynamic, independent, rooted in his community. A veteran of Operation Allied Force in Kosovo, an instructional pilot in the Navy Reserve, and a former assistant to the U.S. Secretary of Education, he brings to this race a refreshing energy and integrity.

Seaman, on the other, seems to be the man for whom the term "furniture" to describe inept lawmakers was coined. He pocketed $35,000 from DeLay's TRMPAC and its parent organization ARMPAC in his 2002 race. He took an additional $80,000 from other DeLay-linked sources, including Houston megadonor Bob Perry, the indicted Texas Association of Business, and Texans for Lawsuit Reform.

And then he voted in lock step for every extremist idea to come down the pike. Redistricting? Why not! Cut half-a-million kids off CHIP? You bet! Double college tuition rates? Of course! The single biggest tax hike in Texas history? Who cares!

Let's take a stand for Juan Garcia against DeLay's rubber stamp. Click here to send him a generous donation so he can keep fighting to provide Corpus Christi with the kind of independent voice it deserves.

Fight On!
Richard Morrison

Pretty cool, huh? We win the Texas House back one seat at a time. This is the race we can and need to win. Go help and contribute to Juan's campaign.

Posted by Eddie on 04/11/2006 at 04:14 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Tomstown Scandal, Tom Delay Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (2)
Seaman asked to get rid of dirty Delay money
Lt. Cmdr. Juan Garcia, candidate for HD 32, asked for Republican Gene Seaman to return all the dirty Delay money he has received (see full press release here). Garcia suggests that this money should be to donate a local children's health clinic. Seaman's vote on CHIP removed hundreds of thousand of working family's children off the heatlh insurance program in 2003.

State representative candidate Juan Garcia today called on his opponent to give nearly $50,000 he took from Tom DeLay and others linked to the ongoing corruption scandals surrounding the disgraced congressman to a local children's health clinic.

"This campaign should be about our community's future, not my opponent's past," Garcia said. "I encourage him to put this behind him so that we can spend the rest of this campaign talking about how to fix our public schools, keep our kids healthy, and make our neighborhoods stronger."

Incumbent Gene Seaman reported accepting $48,710 in 2002 from two discredited political action committees founded by DeLay, Texans for a Republican Majority (TRMPAC) and its parent organization, Americans for a Republican Majority (ARMPAC), as well as from the Texas Association of Business (TAB). TRMPAC and TAB have since been indicted as part of a continuing criminal grand jury investigation in Travis County.
DeLay announced this week that he will resign his office as the biggest political corruption scandal in a generation continues to embroil the leadership in Washington, D.C. and Austin.

Delay resignation effects all of Texas because his corrupting influence permeated all of Texas. Will Seaman donate the dirty money? Probably not. He probably thinks he did nothing wrong money by taking tainted money. We shall see.



Posted by Eddie on 04/07/2006 at 07:39 AM in Cronyism, HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Tomstown Scandal, Tom Delay Permalink Comments (2) TrackBack (0)
Sunday News Roundup
Ciro has raised over $136,000 from the "The Kiss." Cuellar starts to get desperate.

Chris Bell leads Gammage in a new DMN poll.

San Antonio Express New Editorial Board endorses Joe Farias for HD 118 primary.

Madla still hasn't let the Democrats out of his trunk.

San Antonio social conservative James Leininger trys to kill off moderate Republican by dropping almost $1 million of his own money to support right-wing extremists.

The Corpus Christi chapter of the American Federation of Teachers and Corpus Christi Fire Fighters Association endorse Juan Garcia (HD 32). The New York Times reports on the veterans running for Congress. There are 57 Dems running (map).

Dick Cheney's Freedom Peppering is still a mess.

Law enforcement officials in San Antonio and Alamo Heights are more likely to ask black motorists to submit to voluntary searches than they are to ask white drivers, according to a study (.pdf) released by an Texas Criminal Justice Coalition.

Posted by Eddie on 02/19/2006 at 10:31 AM in Back on the Ranch, CD 28, Cheneyquiddick, Download This!, Human Rights, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Race for Texas Governor 2006, SD 19, San Antonio, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House, The Lege - Senate Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (0)
Sometimes technical difficulties turn out to be a good thing.
Many of TRS’s reader were expecting a play by play of Juan Garcia’s Campaign Kick-Off Rally with Gen. Wesley Clark. We were intending of broadcasting the event with the help of Corpus Christi’s citywide WiFi network. Much to my chagrin, the signal was sporadic at best so I decided to post later and walk the crowd to get a sense of the energy.

It was the best thing that could of happened. I met a friend of the campaign who was filming and needed some help transporting video equipment throughout the night. He asked me to help “produce” and of course I agree to help.

Walking through a crowd of 200+, I felt something I hadn’t felt in a lot time: optimistic hope. I really believe it came from the presence of Clark and Garcia. I saw people who are natural skeptics smile and nod their head in agreement because they knew that they had in front of them a rebirth of Democrats. Candidates like Garcia and Clark is how Democrats earn back the trust of the voters.


Continue reading "Sometimes technical difficulties turn out to be a good thing. " »

Posted by Eddie on 01/29/2006 at 05:22 PM in Foreign Policy, HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Race for U.S. President 2008, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (10) TrackBack (0)
Juan Garcia's Rally Photos
Here are the photos of the Juan Garcia Campaign Rally with Gen. Wes Clark. I have also included some additional photos from tagging along with Wes and Juan. For the complete story, check the Sunday Edition of The Red State.

Posted by Eddie on 01/27/2006 at 08:57 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Race for U.S. President 2008, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (0)
~LIVE BLOG~ Juan Garcia & Gen. Welsey Clark
Greetings everyone. I am down here in Corpus Christi, the Sparkling City by the Sea. I will be providing live-coverage of the Juan Garcia's Kick Off Rally with Gen. Wesley Clark. Juan is running for State Representative in District 32. The rally is set to start at 4:30pm at the Selena Auditorium but if you are coming you should probably be here by 4:00pm.

It is late morning and I am blogging from the 2nd floor of the flagship Whataburger by the Bay store.

11:30am ~ Juan asked me to tag along this morning. First, he spoke to at the local meeting of the GI Forum. For those who do not know, the GI Forum was founded in Corpus Christi and one the first and most effective organizations to protect the rights of Mexican-American veterans and their families. The widow and daughter of founder, Dr. Hector P. Garcia, was at the breakfast and is expected to be in attendance at tonight's rally. Dr. Hector, as he is fondly called, was the recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Being from Corpus Christi, I have heard many of stories about Dr. Hector. Every single story I heard was about how Dr. Hector helped them when they most needed help.

After the breakfast, we then ran over to the local talk radio show for a quick interview. Juan talked about tonight's rally with Gen. Wesley Clark. The radio show host was real nice and helped point out that we were going to have a presidential candidate speaking tonight. This may be common place in bigger cities but in Corpus it is a special treat for everyone here.

More live coverage and photos after the jump. Comments are open

Continue reading "~LIVE BLOG~ Juan Garcia & Gen. Welsey Clark" »

Posted by Eddie on 01/26/2006 at 12:29 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Race for U.S. President 2008, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (5) TrackBack (2)
TRS to live-blog Juan Garcia's kick off rally with Gen. Clark
As noted on the Rio Grande Guardian and Democratic Underground, The Red State will be live-blogging Juan Garcia's kick off rally for his race for Texas House District 32 with honored guest Gen. Wesley Clark. I encourage everyone who can go to Corpus Christi this Thursday to attend the rally. These are the first steps of a great new candidate and the next step for a true contender for the White House. I expect great things from these two very accomplished men.

For those who cannot make it but want to ask Wes Clark or Juan Garcia a question, send it to TRS via email and we will do our best to get it asked.

UPDATE: Burnt Orange Report has an interview with Juan Garcia.


Posted by Eddie on 01/24/2006 at 06:01 AM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Race for U.S. President 2008, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (3) TrackBack (2)
Wesley Clark kicks off Juan Garcia's campaign

Gen. Wesley Clark, former presidential candidate and NATO's Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, will be in Corpus Christi, TX on January 26, 2006 to announce his support for Juan Garcia's race (campaign website) for Texas House District 32.

I cannot remember the last time a Presidential candidate visited our Sparkling City By The Sea. This is huge!

General Wesley Clark will join fellow veteran and state representative candidate Juan Garcia for a formal campaign kick-off rally on January 26 at the Selena Auditorium.

"I am honored to have General Clark's endorsement and strong support in my campaign to set a new direction for the families and small businesses of House District 32," Garcia said. "His biography and his record of commitment to our country speaks for itself."

During 34 years of service in the U.S. Army, Clark rose to the rank of four-star general as NATO's Supreme Allied Commander, and led the effort to end ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. He graduated first in his class at West Point, and was awarded the Silver Star for his gallantry in Vietnam. A Rhodes Scholar, he serves as a frequent commentator on FOX News. Clark won the 2004 Presidential primary in Oklahoma, and is viewed by many analysts as a strong contender for the White House in 2008. Garcia served under Clark's command during Kosovo, and the two men later became friends when Garcia was selected to serve as a White House Fellow, the nation's premiere leadership development program, whose alumni include Clark, Colin Powell and Henry Cisneros.

The rally is scheduled to be held from 4:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 26 in the Selena Auditorium. The event will be followed by a fundraising reception from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Full Press Release (.doc)

If you can attend the rally, GO! Corpus Christi is beautiful this time of year. If you can't go but want to help, then you can volunteer or contribute to his campaign. His new website (www.electjuangarcia.com) should have all the info.

I met Gen. Clark in 2003 and found him to no nonsense kind of guy. I have a pretty good BS meter with politicians and found him to be honest and forthright with his answers to questions. Given Clark's and Garcia's background, I think they are a great match. Clark's announcement will help bring out the important military vote in that district. This is a candidate you can be excited about...







UPDATE: WesPac has the event up on its calender.

Posted by Eddie on 01/17/2006 at 03:05 PM in Did he just say that?!?, HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (2)
Juan Garcia want all the votes not just Dems
In order for Juan Garcia to win House District 32, he must appeal not only to Democrats but moderate Republicans and Independents. This is a swing Republican district with a heavy military presence. I don't think you will ever win over the extreme right wing who are actively trying take out the moderate Republicans who vote their district like Carter Casteel. I think his impressive military background definitely will win over some conservative voters to his side. His latest press release announces his new campaign treasurer:

"Joe is a trusted friend who has served this community well and who understands the need to restore balance and independence at the State Capitol," Garcia said.

Hall is a former Marine, Desert Storm pilot, and registered Republican with an MBA degree from Texas A&M and a successful small Coastal Bend business. Hall and his wife, a public school teacher from Pearland, are respected community leaders.

“Juan is running to be part of the solution, not part of the problem,” Hall said. “He will be the kind of independent voice we need in Austin, not just another rubber stamp.” [Emphasis added]

I am glad that he going after all the votes not just some of them. The job of State Representative represents all the people in a district. Unfortunately, there are Reps out there who rather vote for the interest of the small group of fringe and radical Republicans instead of their district. I won't ever fault someone for voting their district 'cause that is their job (and most folks are in the happy middle).

Posted by Eddie on 01/06/2006 at 08:56 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (0)
My Day with Juan Garcia
Today is the one-year anniversary of the first real post on the The Red State. I tackled the cronyism I saw happening while I worked in the 2003 Texas Legislature. It's funny what a year can bring.

I was invited by Lt. Cmdr. Juan Garcia to join him in Austin today for his filing at the Democratic Party Headquarters. Since I have never been to a filing, I agreed to go.

I am so glad I did.

The HQ buzzed with activity with everyone moving with a purpose. It seemed a bit chaotic until you stopped and and watched it move. There were many folks from around the state bringing their paperwork to be filed. There were people with the means to do so comfortably. There were people who obvious first time candidates. It was a treat to see so many folks anxious to get their filings entered and made official.

Juan was quite comfortable meeting the party officials and staff. He has a very natural way with people. When they found out who he was, their faces lit up. They were happy he was there and that he was running. This was sincere since they had already heard that he had decided to run for HD 32.

I forget sometimes about the folks who dedicate their lives to help Democrats get elected. Many of the staff were in their mid to late 20s and obviously very bright. Most could be doing whatever they wanted to in life but have chosen to serve.

I pulled Juan aside to ask him about what he thought about all this and why he was running because he doesn't need to do this. He has a great education, a good job and a responsibility to his young family. This race will take him away from his family. He has already served his country in a way only a few among us can. His job as a navy pilot is probably one of the most dangerous jobs a person can do. And yet he still throws his hat in the ring.... He told me that it is all worth it if he can make Texas a better place for his family and Texas families' future. The sacrifice he makes will be far outweighed by the good he can achieve for them.

Juan Garcia's race is far bigger than HD 32. His run is a testament that Democrats can run supremely qualified candidates. His run sets the stage for what the future will hold for Texas Democrats. His run can inspire people to get involved and help create the new Democratic Party. His run will inspire others to run (in fact it has already). To some, this may seem like pie in the sky but once you meet him you will know what I am talking about.

At some point you have to stop gawking and complaining and do something about it. I was quite surprised when I was moved to do something about it myself. Somewhere amidst the the hustle and bustle of day, I decided to run. I said my goodbyes to all the good people at the Party, personally thanked Juan Garcia for running and went back home to San Antonio.

I called my good friend and asked him to run with me for Precinct Chair in our respective precincts. Neither of us had ever done anything like this before. He agreed to run. It is not as large of job as Juan will have but I believe it's important. We cannot wait for others make the change we would want. We have be that change ourselves.

Starting 1/2/06, I am officially running for Precinct Chair 4001 in Bexar County.

Posted by Eddie on 01/02/2006 at 11:28 PM in Austin, HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, San Antonio, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (1)
Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia to run for House District 32
THE RED STATE EXCLUSIVE

Putting rumors and speculation to rest, TRS has confirmed that Lt. Cmdr. Juan Garcia will run for Texas House District 32.

I first met Juan Garcia at the DNC Hispanic Leadership Summit in San Antonio earlier this year and I have spent quite a bit of time with him in last few months. Let me tell you about what I have learned.

Raised in South Texas, Juan has impressive credentials. U.C.L.A undergrad. J.D. from Harvard Law School (where he met his wife). Master's in Public Policy from Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government. White House Fellow. 13 years Navy fighter pilot with missions in Kosovo and the Persian Gulf.

Currently, he is a practicing attorney in Corpus Christi all while still training young Navy pilots. He was a Special Assistant to the U.S. Secretary of Education from 1999-2000, chaired the Board of Directors of "Citizens for Educational Excellence," and was a member of the CCISD district-wide Planning and Decision-Making Team. He also serves on the Board of Governors for Leadership Corpus Christi, the Dr. Hector P. Garcia Memorial Foundation, and the Boy Scouts.

If you ever get a chance to meet him in person, he is even more impressive than his resume. Now, this is going to be a tough race against the incumbent, the tragically named, Gene Seaman (R). Some may know him for being furniture in the Capitol but most remember him for his nasty little tirade (wmv clip) on the floor of the Texas House of Representatives during session in 2003.

Much more on this announcement once I land on the ground....


Posted by Eddie on 12/31/2005 at 04:09 PM in HD 32, Lt. Cdr. Juan Garcia, South Texas, Sparkling City by the Sea, The Lege - House Permalink Comments (0) TrackBack (1)
Recent Posts

Sunday, May 28, 2006

South Texas Chisme: Erasing the Hispanic vote

Juan more voice.....
Posted on May 29, 2006 at 01:28:04 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

raised infinitely to the power of South Texas for the ascension of Juan Garcia III to the Office of District 32 State Representative.

We can put this man into office.

We can defeat the insurance big money.

Well South Texas, it is now up to us.

When I woke up this morning, I did not even know WATT Juan Garcia III looked like much less who his supporters were.

Good People!

That is all I will say for now, GOOD PEOPLE!

Hey South Texas Democrats get over the bickering and the envy.

We got an election to win!

Join the Army of Juan.

Who are you Juan Garcia III?

Let's make South Texas Rumble.

More on this race (against the INSURANCE industry) coming to your community soon!


Now, in response to you Sam Sylvia; are you Sam or Sylvia?

Why did they throw that money out so suddenly?

They were challenged by who?

If you choose to do the pre historic block walking while the organizer hordes the bulk of the money, that is your choice.

It did Tony Sanchez absolutely no good. It helped Barbie Girl not one iota.

My talents are much more profound as an online advocate. I do mean WATT I say and say WATT I mean.

Read We The People May edition and if you still do not understand my reference then you must be totally "out of the loop". Those "in the know" understood perfectly. John Kelley knows exactly WATT I am referring to.

I thank you for your input and it is refreshing to experience individuality as you exhibit. I look forward to meeting you.

Both of you.

Suggestions?????

I have many suggestions and many fall on deaf ears.

When it comes to a Gazillionaires Club or an Elitist City Council controlling our political environment for their own personal interest; I will never "relax and enjoy it".

Very few people have spoken up for this man Juan Garcia III.

So We did right here and look WATT happened


Hey, Sam or Sylvia take a look at where the money goes and I bet somebody or a couple of somebodies will end up with a good chunk for themselves while somebody sweats their a$$ off for 6 bucks an hour. All it is, is an information gathering campaign with people speaking on behalf of three different candidates which puts Juan in the same boat with Jimmy and Larry.

Juan IMO is in a class a few tiers above these guys.

He is a class act with the charisma and energy required to represent South Texas' interest and not big money.

The Army just got a Weapon of Mass Construction!

Sunday, May 21, 2006

Why is the Equal Time Rule ignored by the South Texas Media & District Attorneys? Too Political?

U.S. RADIO AND TV STATIONS REQUIREDTO GIVE CANDIDATES EQUAL TIME
Under the First Amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing freedom of the press, radio and television stations in the United States have enormous latitude in their coverage of candidates and elections. But according to experts, one regulation that has remained, and is likely to remain, is the Equal Time rule.
Under a provision of the 1934 Communications Act, if a broadcast station provides time for one political candidate, it must do so for his or her opponents. This provision -- Section 315 of the law -- is known as the Equal Time rule. It states: "If any licensee shall permit any person who is a legally qualified candidate for any political office to use a broadcasting station, he shall afford equal opportunities to all other such candidates for that office in the use of such broadcasting station."
It is a simple concept, but interpretation of the Equal Time rule has evolved over the years as politics and technology have changed. It continues to evolve. In a recent interview, Robert Baker, of the political program section of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the government regulatory agency for the U.S. communications industry, said that "the three principal components of the rule are a requirement that if broadcasters sell time to political candidates they must treat them all equally, allow them to purchase time at favorable rates and not attempt to censor the content of their ads."
In addition to paid political advertising, the law also applies to some programs paid for by the stations in which candidates may appear without purchasing the airtime. Baker explained that as a result of an amendment to Section 315 in 1959, the rule does not apply to regular news and public affairs programming. Thus, if a "legally qualified" candidate appears on a bona fide news program, the station is under no obligation to provide time to other candidates.
The question of what is a bona fide news program, however, at a time when news and entertainment are often mixed in the same program is a subject of much debate in the communications industry. According to Dwight Teeter and Don Duc, authors of Law of Mass Communications, the FCC "has expanded its category of broadcast programs exempted from political access requirements to include entertainment shows that provide news or current event coverage as regularly scheduled segments of the program."
The act stipulates certain requirements for a candidate to be "legally qualified," the most important of which is that he or she be a declared candidate in accordance with applicable state and federal laws. According to broadcast historians, one of the most celebrated tests of this aspect of the rule occurred in December 1967 when the three major commercial television networks carried an hour-long interview with President Lyndon Johnson, a Democrat. It was only a few months before the New Hampshire primary, the first major test in the 1968 race for the presidency.
Eugene McCarthy, who had announced his own candidacy for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination before the broadcast, requested "equal time" from the networks on the grounds that President Johnson was a legally qualified candidate for the same nomination. The appeal was denied because Johnson had not, at that point, declared that he was a candidate for reelection. This is one reason why candidates time an announcement that they are running for office very carefully, so as not to trigger the Equal Time rule requiring stations to give broadcast time in equal measure to their opponents.
There are certain, narrow exceptions to the Equal Time rule that have evolved over the years, however. The most important exception concerns national televised debates involving the major presidential candidates. Not long after debates among the leading candidates for president became a standard component of campaigns in 1976, the FCC moved to exempt them from the Equal Time rule.
Since November 1983, the FCC has allowed the debates to be considered "bona fide news events," thus triggering the exemption. Under the old rule, even minor candidates could have requested equal time during the presidential debates, a problem that led organizations, such as the League of Women Voters, to cover the debates, which the networks then covered as news events. Baker explained that although there is now no requirement that all candidates be included in the presidential debates, the FCC has urged broadcasters not to "favor or disfavor" any particular candidate.
Although the Equal Time rule is concerned with equal access, not initial access, for candidates, a 1979 ruling by the FCC, in effect, required stations to give candidates for federal office "reasonable access" to the airwaves. The case resulted from a request by then-President Jimmy Carter to buy airtime for his reelection campaign. The networks denied the request on the grounds that no equal time provision was at issue and it was too early in the campaign. The FCC, and ultimately the Supreme Court, ruled that the networks should have provided the time. This is now known as the "reasonable access" rule.
In the past, the Equal Time rule was often confused with the Fairness Doctrine, which required that broadcasters "operate in the public interest and afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public interest." The Fairness Doctrine ceased to be a requirement in 1987. Baker explained that although a few minor elements remain, "essentially the Fairness Doctrine was abolished."
Critics have complained that since the Fairness Doctrine was shelved, stations have become less responsible in the coverage of issues. But opponents of the Fairness Doctrine say it was an unnecessary regulatory requirement on broadcasters that other media, such as newspapers, were never required to meet. Since there are now many more broadcast stations than newspapers, opponents say viewers have enough choice on coverage of issues without regulation, especially in an age of hundreds of stations courtesy of cable and satellite television companies.
As new democracies around the world wrestle with issues of regulation in broadcasting to ensure fairness for political candidates in elections, the U.S. experience is an indication that even simple rules are not always easy to implement in practice and must be periodically reevaluated in the light of changing circumstances, both technological as well as political.

Thursday, May 18, 2006

Sounds like somebody is pissed cuz they cant hunt Mexicans? You know a little bloodshed!

curmudgeon
Posts: 2851

Solomon's parents were wetbacks . . .
5/18/2006 8:48:17 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . are you surprised he would be against stopping the invasion from Mexico?


Collapse all posts in this thread
Author Replys
CommonSense
Posts: 491
Re: Solomon''s parents were wetbacks . . .
5/18/2006 9:08:39 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wasn''t buying his crap. He doesn''t want the National Guard on the border because they are trained for war? What a bunch of bull. Like I told Eric yesterday, many of these guys are combat vets and they aren''t going to be ""trigger happy"". Who else would be better at guarding the line than these folks.

He also made the comparison to the Berlin wall. Either he is just plain ignorant or he is just plain ignorant. Take your pick. The fence or wall will not stop illegals. It will slow them down.

After Solomon being in DC for so long, I do believe that he is out of touch with his constituants.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2851

Did you really expect . . .
5/18/2006 9:20:12 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . him to say that he was for amnesty and against the wall because his parents were from Mexico?
CommonSense
Posts: 491
Re: Did you really expect . . .
5/18/2006 9:35:03 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No... not really. I did expect him to side with this country as a sovereign nation that has borders that need to be enforced.

The way I see it, is he is treating this like the country peddlers show. You pay to get in, get your hand stamped, and then you can do anything you want. Heck, you can even leave and come back.
curtis rock
Posts: 698

Re: Re: Did you really expect . . .
5/18/2006 9:51:25 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can''t seriously believe that Solomon understands sovereignty and borders do you?

I''ve noticed that every time I have a viewpoint on an issue, I can pretty much count on most politicians not in agreement.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2851

Solomon understands . . .
5/18/2006 9:53:55 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . it alright, he just doesn''t agree with it.
CommonSense
Posts: 491
Re: Re: Re: Did you really expect . . .
5/18/2006 9:56:49 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. That is why I believe most are out of touch with what their constituants really want.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2851

Solomon also knows . . .
5/18/2006 9:59:14 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . what his constitients want, most of whom have ancestors who came from Mexico.
Elwood Blues
Posts: 250

Re: Re: Solomon''s parents were wetbacks . . .
5/18/2006 11:22:47 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
""After Solomon being in DC for so long,I do believe that he is out of touch with his constituants"".

He''s BEEN out of touch for a long time,CS.He''s spent the last four to five years pandering to Brownsville''s interests while ignoring ours..why?.. because he knows that we can''t throw him out of office.His district is so gerrymandered that if we here voted against him 8-1,he''d still win re-election as long as he carries Brownsville and Cameron County.

He couldn''t care less what people here think of him,he coudn''t care less whether anybody here votes for him or not..as long as he''s got the Valley in his ass pocket,he knows we''re stuck with him,and there''s not a damned thing we can do about it.When''s the last time you saw ""Smilin Sol"" debate an opponent? When''s the last time you saw him defend his abysmal voting record..to ANYBODY? You won''t,either.He doesn''t have to answer to anybody here and he knows it.
Wild Ape
Posts: 2724

It is outrageous
5/18/2006 12:09:56 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How can anyone fight this much widespread corruption. It isn''t that he goes against what I think, it is that this country can be so easily subverted.
HardcoreHarry
Posts: 1739

Re: Re: Re: Solomon''s parents were wetbacks . . .
5/18/2006 12:20:35 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn''t have said it better myself Elwood!

I turned on the radio in the truck this morning and the first thing I thought was: Why is Homer Villareal on the radio on Thursdays? I kid you not! Solomon and Homer''s voices could be interchangeable as to the unity of and indistinguishable significance of the messages they work to get across. Thusly, this translates into the fact that both are operating on the same apparent agenda. Together they are Frick and Frack.

Hardcore Harry

LONEWOLF
Posts: 422
Hey -- Was That...
5/18/2006 12:02:32 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...you that called in right after Solomon left??

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Nueces De La Parra: Sexual Harrasment @ Del Mar and now Teresa Cox fired. AGAIN>

Monday, May 15, 2006

Transparent & Electronic Justice and the Nueces County Courthouse State of the Art or a Clandestine Venue of Glass without the Art?

Jaime Kenedeño said...
Who can produce the Alvarez supporters?

Who Are You Rose Vela?

Who Are You Federico Hinojosa?

Who are You Jim Kaelin?

Who Are You Jimmy Rodriguez?

Who Are You Guy Williams?

Who Are You Marisela Saldana?

Who Are You Robert Zamora?

Who Are You Tom Greenwell?

Who Are You James Sales?

Who Are You Bobby Galvan?

Why should my audience vote for you?

Yes or no?

Can you name one positive point about your opponent?

Yes or no?

If yes

well you can imagine the interview?

Can I remain objective?

Yes or No?

Who Are You James Klager?

Who Are You David Jones?

Who Are You Carolyn Moon?

Who Are You Larry Cox?

Who Are You Pedro Cavazos?

Who Are You Patsy Perez?

We will display You in the Light with the utmost eloquent of exposure to your(uniquely positive) campaign.

And let's keep it clean!

Except with Neal.

He always plays dirty.

And acts CLEAN.

Go figure???

1:44 AM

South Texas Chisme: Chisme roundup

South Texas Chisme: Political Pulse notes

Saturday, May 13, 2006

Remember George Moff? WATT about complicity (cosigner Canales)"

NUMBER 13-02-123-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
GEORGE MOFF , Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.
___________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 94th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.
__________________________________________________________________
O P I N I O N
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Amidei (1)
Opinion by Justice Rodriguez
Appellant George Moff brings this appeal following a conviction for theft by a public servant of property valued between $500.00 and $1,500.00. By three issues, appellant generally contends the evidence was legally insufficient to support: (1) appellant's conviction; (2) the fair market value of the stolen property; and (3) appellant's status as a public servant at the time of the theft. We affirm.
I. Facts
Appellant was hired as Chief Appraiser for the Nueces County Appraisal District (the District) in 1981 by the District's Board of Directors (the Board). After eighteen years of service, appellant resigned as chief appraiser in December 1999. Before he left, appellant paid the District $1,100.00 for property he had in his possession. The Board hired Ollie Grant to replace appellant as the chief appraiser.
In March 2000, Grant prepared an inventory of the District's property and found certain items missing. In April 2000, appellant met Grant at a local restaurant, and returned several items that belonged to the District. (2) Because of the discrepancy in the inventory and actions by appellant, the Nueces County District Attorney's office (D.A.) began a formal investigation. The D.A. contacted Texas Ranger Roberto Garza, Jr., to assist in the investigation of appellant. In June 2000, appellant's attorney returned additional District items that had been in appellant's possession. (3) These items were returned to Ranger Garza.
In May 2001, appellant was indicted for third degree felony theft by a public servant of property valued between $1,500.00 and $20,000.00. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. §§ 31.03(a), (e)(4), (f)(1), & 31.09 (Vernon 2003). However, the jury found appellant guilty of the lesser included offense of theft by a public servant of property valued between $500.00 and $1,500.00, a state jail felony. See id. §§ 31.03(a), (e)(3), (f)(1), & 31.09 (Vernon 2003). The trial court assessed punishment at one year incarceration, suspended, and a $4,000.00 fine. This appeal ensued.
II. Sufficiency of the evidence
A. Standard of Review
In reviewing legal sufficiency, we look at all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); Vasquez v. State, 67 S.W.3d 229, 236 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). As fact finder, the jury is the exclusive judge of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be afforded to their testimony. Chambers v. State, 805 S.W.2d 459, 461 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The jury may use common sense and apply common knowledge, observation, and experience gained in the ordinary affairs of life when giving effect to the inferences that may be reasonably drawn from the evidence. Booker v. State, 929 S.W.2d 57, 60 (Tex. App.-Beaumont 1996, pet. ref'd). In conducting our analysis, we may not re-weigh the evidence and substitute our judgment for that of the jury. King v. State, 29 S.W.3d 556, 562 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The standard is the same for both direct and circumstantial evidence cases. Kutzer v. State, 994 S.W.2d 180, 184 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Vela v. State, 771 S.W.2d 659, 660 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1989, pet. ref'd).
B. Appellant's Conviction
By his first issue, appellant contends the evidence is legally insufficient to prove he unlawfully appropriated property belonging to the District. Specifically, appellant challenges the "unlawfulness" of his appropriation of the property in question.
A person commits theft if he "unlawfully appropriates property with intent to deprive the owner of property," and such appropriation is unlawful if "it is without the owner's effective consent." Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 31.03(a) & (b)(1) (Vernon 2003). Appropriation means "to acquire or otherwise exercise control over property . . . ." Id. § 31.01(4) (Vernon 2003). Appellant contends the State failed to prove that appellant's acquisition and control over the property in question was without the consent of the District. We disagree.
In cases alleging theft of property by an employee or fiduciary, theft may be established by showing the accused did not have authority to dispose of or appropriate the property in the manner alleged. Huff v. State, 897 S.W.2d 829, 834 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1995, pet. ref'd). Thus, theft is established by showing the accused acted in a way inconsistent with his lawful authority. Id.; see Freeman v. State, 707 S.W.2d 597, 605 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). When the accused "decides, for whatever reason, to unlawfully and permanently deprive the lawful owner of the property, he is then acting in an unauthorized capacity . . . . The line between lawful and unlawful activity by an employee [or fiduciary] is therefore a question of the scope of his authority." Freeman, 707 S.W.2d at 605-06; see Huff, 897 S.W.2d at 834; Bailey v. State, 885 S.W.2d 193, 197-98 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1994, pet. ref'd).
Looking at the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, Jackson, 443 U.S. at 319;Vasquez, 67 S.W.3d at 236, the evidence shows appellant did not have consent to take the District's property home. Although there was not a written rule restricting the chief appraiser from taking District property home and storing it there, board member Ronnie Canales gave testimony that he did not give appellant such consent. Moreover, although the Board consented to and co-signed checks used to purchase the property in question, Ranger Garza testified that at least one board member did not know he was approving the purchase of a satellite dish when he co-signed a check for its purchase. Ranger Garza testified that when appellant wanted approval and a check for the satellite dish, appellant told the Board that the purchase was for office supplies. Board member Canales did not know he was co-signing a check for a satellite dish.
Furthermore, Grant testified that he had never seen any of the items appellant returned to him. Grant also testified that a majority of the items returned through appellant's attorney were items not normally used in the appraisal business and the District would not have had a use for them. The evidence also showed that when Grant asked appellant about a missing computer, appellant denied having one. The next day, however, appellant called Grant and asked him how much it would cost for appellant to buy the computer he previously denied possessing. The computer was later returned to Ranger Garza by appellant's attorney. Moreover, appellant asked Kevin Parker, a general contractor for the District, to return tools to the District, tools appellant had in his possession. When Parker told appellant he did not have a key to get into the District building, appellant asked Parker to see if Timothy Pendergraft, director of data processing for the District, would return the tools for appellant. Pendergraft refused to assist appellant in returning the tools.
We find this evidence supports the jury's finding that appellant exceeded his lawful authority as chief appraiser. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. §§ 31.03(a), (e)(3), (f)(1), & 31.09; see also Freeman, 707 S.W.2d at 605-06; Huff, 897 S.W.2d at 834; Bailey, 885 S.W.2d at197-98. The evidence is clear that as chief appraiser, appellant had authority to purchase and possess property for the District. However, the evidence also shows appellant exceeded this authority by taking the property home and retaining the property for months after his resignation, and by purchasing items that could not be, or were not, used for District business. Moreover, it seems appellant knew he had exceeded his authority by his efforts in having others return certain items, denying he had possession of the computer when confronted about it, and acting in a deceiving manner when getting the Board to approve and co-sign a check for the purchase of the satellite dish. See Margraves v. State, 34 S.W.3d 912, 919 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000) (jury's inference of intent is afforded more deference than evidence supporting proof of conduct, and circumstantial evidence of defendant's knowledge is not required to meet same rigorous criteria as circumstantial proof of other elements).
Thus, we find the evidence sufficiently shows appellant had the intention to, and did, unlawfully appropriate the District's property. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. §§ 31.03(a), (e)(3), (f)(1), & 31.09; see also Freeman, 707 S.W.2d at 605-06; Huff, 897 S.W.2d at 834; Bailey, 885 S.W.2d at 197-98. Appellant's first issue is overruled.
C. Value of the Property
By his second issue, appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to support the fair market value of the property. We find it unnecessary to reach appellant's contention because error, if any, was waived.
Appellant failed to properly object to the State's method of proving the value of the items unlawfully appropriated by appellant. The only objections made by appellant were for hearsay and lack of predicate. Even then, the objections came after the State had already established the values of four separate items. "If the manner of proving an item's value does not meet the accused's approval, it is incumbent upon him to voice his objection at the time of the introduction of the testimony." Brown v. State, 640 S.W.2d 275, 279 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982); Garcia v. State, 787 S.W.2d 185, 185 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1990, no. pet.). Error presented on appeal will not be considered if it varies from the specific objections made during trial. Garcia, 787 S.W.2d at 185. We find appellant's objections were insufficient to inform the trial court that appellant was complaining of the State's method of proving the value of the items. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1. Appellant's second issue is overruled.
D. Public Servant
By his third issue, appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to prove appellant was a public servant after he resigned as chief appraiser. If he should be found guilty, appellant argues, the offense should be a misdemeanor and not a state jail felony. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 31.03 (e)(3), (f)(1) (offense rises to state jail felony if actor was public servant at time of offense and property came into actor's possession, custody, or control by virtue of his status as public servant). This argument has no merit.
We have already found sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict that appellant unlawfully appropriated District property while he was employed as the District's chief appraiser. However, we do not find any evidence to suggest appellant unlawfully misappropriated District property after he resigned as chief appraiser. The fact that appellant still had possession of District property after he resigned, does not negate the fact that when he initially came into possession and control of the property, appellant was a public servant. See id. § 31.03(f)(1). Appellant's third issue is overruled.
III. Conclusion
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ
Justice
Publish .
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Opinion delivered and filed
this 5th day of June, 2003.
1. Former Justice Maurice Amidei assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 74.003 (Vernon 1998).
2. These items included: (1) a thirty-five millimeter camera; (2) automotive battery charger; (3) a power washer; and (4) a drill and saw set.
3. These items included: (1) a digital camera; (2) a bit box; (3) an espresso and cappuccino maker; (4) an engine starter; (5) light bulbs; (6) a rechargeable power pack; (7) a power center for power tool rechargers; (8) jumper cables; (9) a horsepower clamp; (10) speaking Spanish software; (11) arcade games software; (12) ratchet tie-downs; (13) a satellite dish; (14) two remote controls; (15) computer cables; (16) a battery charger; (17) a satellite controller box; (18) a printer/scanner; (19) a copier machine; (20) two printers; (21) a television; (22) a vacuum cleaner; (23) computer and software; (24) floor jack; (25) dolly; (26) motion detector; (27) security light; (28) ear-plugs; (29) batteries; (30) zoom lens; (31) a digital multimeter; (32) a hammer; (33) a tool set; (34) a global positioning system; (35) a masonry blade; (36) a ratchet set; (37) an outlet power strip; (38) a set of booster cables; and (39) two tool boxes.